Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Urology Reports Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w
Angus Luk, Robert Geraghty, Bhaskar Somani
{"title":"Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?","authors":"Angus Luk,&nbsp;Robert Geraghty,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key.</p>","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":"24 8","pages":"365-370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403423/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: Small renal stones in the lower pole are often difficult to treat. The angle of the lower pole to the renal pelvis (lower pole angle) is a limiting factor to rendering the patient stone free. This review explores the definitions of the lower pole angle, the various treatment options available, and how outcomes are influenced by the angle.

Recent findings: It is clear the lower pole angle definition varies widely depending on described technique and imaging modality. However, it is clear that outcomes are worse with a steeper angle, especially for shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has similar reported outcomes to RIRS, and there is limited evidence it may be superior for steeper angles over RIRS. Lower pole stones can be technically challenging and adequate assessment prior to choosing operative approach is key.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小(< 2厘米)下极结石的泌尿道选择-下极角度重要吗?
回顾目的:肾下极的小肾结石通常难以治疗。下极与肾盂的角度(下极角度)是使患者结石清除的限制因素。本综述探讨了下极角的定义、各种可用的治疗方案,以及下极角对预后的影响。最近的发现:很明显,根据所描述的技术和成像方式的不同,下极角的定义差异很大。然而,很明显,角度越陡,结果越差,尤其是冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)。经皮肾镜取石术与RIRS有相似的报道结果,并且有有限的证据表明经皮肾镜取石术在更陡的角度上优于RIRS。下极结石在技术上具有挑战性,在选择手术入路之前进行充分的评估是关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology Reports
Current Urology Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Innate Versus Acquired: A Review of Predictive Technical Aptitude Assessments in Surgical Trainee Selection. Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms during the Treatment for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Men's Health Clinic Efficiency and Clinic Billing. Health-Related Quality of Life Across the Spectrum of Bladder Cancer: A Current Review. Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision-Making in Erectile Dysfunction: a Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1