The Reliability of Rating via Audio-Recording Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2023-05-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130221149966
Erin Floyd, Shelley R Adler, Rebecca S Crane, Judson Brewer, Patricia Moran, Robert Richler, Wendy Hartogensis, Willem Kuyken, Frederick M Hecht
{"title":"The Reliability of Rating via Audio-Recording Using the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria.","authors":"Erin Floyd, Shelley R Adler, Rebecca S Crane, Judson Brewer, Patricia Moran, Robert Richler, Wendy Hartogensis, Willem Kuyken, Frederick M Hecht","doi":"10.1177/27536130221149966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) is an important tool for assessing teacher skill and aspects of the fidelity of mindfulness-based interventions, but prior research on and implementation of the MBI:TAC has used video recordings, which can be difficult to obtain, share for assessments, and which increase privacy concerns for participants. Audio-only recordings might be a useful alternative, but their reliability is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess evaluator perception of the rating process and inter-rater reliability of MBI:TAC ratings using audio-only recordings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prepared audio-only files from video recordings of 21 previously rated Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction teachers. Each audio recording was rated by 3 trained MBI:TAC assessors drawn from a pool of 12 who had previously participated in rating the video recordings. Teachers were rated by evaluators who had not viewed the video recording and did not know the teacher. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with evaluators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 6 MBI:TAC domains, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for audio recordings ranged from .53 to .69 using an average across 3 evaluators. Using a single rating resulted in lower ICCs (.27-.38). Bland-Altman plots showed audio ratings had little consistent bias compared to video recordings and agreed more closely for teachers with higher ratings. Qualitative analysis identified 3 themes: video recordings were particularly helpful when rating less skillful teachers, video recordings tended to provide a more complete picture for rating, and audio rating had some positive features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inter-rater reliability of the MBI:TAC using audio-only recordings was adequate for many research and clinical purposes, and reliability is improved when using an average across several evaluators. Ratings using audio-only recordings may be more challenging when rating less experienced teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/e4/10.1177_27536130221149966.PMC10196544.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130221149966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) is an important tool for assessing teacher skill and aspects of the fidelity of mindfulness-based interventions, but prior research on and implementation of the MBI:TAC has used video recordings, which can be difficult to obtain, share for assessments, and which increase privacy concerns for participants. Audio-only recordings might be a useful alternative, but their reliability is unknown.

Objective: To assess evaluator perception of the rating process and inter-rater reliability of MBI:TAC ratings using audio-only recordings.

Methods: We prepared audio-only files from video recordings of 21 previously rated Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction teachers. Each audio recording was rated by 3 trained MBI:TAC assessors drawn from a pool of 12 who had previously participated in rating the video recordings. Teachers were rated by evaluators who had not viewed the video recording and did not know the teacher. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with evaluators.

Results: On the 6 MBI:TAC domains, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for audio recordings ranged from .53 to .69 using an average across 3 evaluators. Using a single rating resulted in lower ICCs (.27-.38). Bland-Altman plots showed audio ratings had little consistent bias compared to video recordings and agreed more closely for teachers with higher ratings. Qualitative analysis identified 3 themes: video recordings were particularly helpful when rating less skillful teachers, video recordings tended to provide a more complete picture for rating, and audio rating had some positive features.

Conclusions: Inter-rater reliability of the MBI:TAC using audio-only recordings was adequate for many research and clinical purposes, and reliability is improved when using an average across several evaluators. Ratings using audio-only recordings may be more challenging when rating less experienced teachers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于正念的干预措施通过录音进行评分的可靠性:教学评估标准。
背景:基于正念的干预措施:教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)是评估教师技能和基于正念干预措施保真度方面的重要工具,但先前对MBI:TAC的研究和实施使用了视频记录,这可能很难获得、共享用于评估,并增加了参与者的隐私问题。纯音频录音可能是一个有用的替代方案,但其可靠性未知。目的:使用纯音频录音评估评估者对MBI:TAC评分过程的感知和评分者间的可靠性。方法:我们从21名先前评分的基于正念的减压教师的视频记录中准备了纯音频文件。每段录音都由3名经过培训的MBI:TAC评估员进行评分,评估员来自12名先前参与对视频录音进行评分的人员。评估人员对老师进行了评分,他们没有看过录像,也不认识老师。然后,我们对评估人员进行了半结构化访谈。结果:在6个MBI:TAC域上,使用3名评估者的平均值,音频记录的组内相关系数(ICCs)在.53到.69之间。使用单一评级会导致ICCs较低(.27-.38)。Bland-Altman图显示,与视频记录相比,音频评级几乎没有一致的偏差,并且与评级较高的教师更为一致。定性分析确定了3个主题:当对技能较差的教师进行评分时,视频记录尤其有用,视频记录往往为评分提供更完整的画面,音频评分具有一些积极特征。结论:MBI:TAC的评分者间可靠性:使用纯音频记录对于许多研究和临床目的来说是足够的,并且当使用几个评估者的平均值时,可靠性得到了提高。当对经验不足的教师进行评分时,使用纯音频录音进行评分可能更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needs and Preferences for Remote-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Using PROMIS Methodology to Create Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness and Related Concepts. Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center. A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity. Efficacy and Safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in Drug Induced Constipation Associated With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Interventional, Parallel, Controlled Trial a Clinical Study on Bacillus coagulans LBSC for Drug Induced Constipation Associated With FGIDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1