Prediction of systemic free and total valproic acid by off-line analysis of exhaled breath in epileptic children and adolescents.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of breath research Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1088/1752-7163/acf782
Mo Awchi, Kapil Dev Singh, Patricia E Dill, Urs Frey, Alexandre N Datta, Pablo Sinues
{"title":"Prediction of systemic free and total valproic acid by off-line analysis of exhaled breath in epileptic children and adolescents.","authors":"Mo Awchi,&nbsp;Kapil Dev Singh,&nbsp;Patricia E Dill,&nbsp;Urs Frey,&nbsp;Alexandre N Datta,&nbsp;Pablo Sinues","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/acf782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of medications with a narrow therapeutic window is a common clinical practice to minimize toxic effects and maximize clinical outcomes. Routine analyses rely on the quantification of systemic blood concentrations of drugs. Alternative matrices such as exhaled breath are appealing because of their inherent non-invasive nature. This is especially the case for pediatric patients. We have recently showcased the possibility of predicting systemic concentrations of valproic acid (VPA), an anti-seizure medication by real-time breath analysis in two real clinical settings. This approach, however, comes with the limitation of the patients having to physically exhale into the mass spectrometer. This restricts the possibility of sampling from patients not capable or available to exhale into the mass spectrometer located on the hospital premises. In this work, we developed an alternative method to overcome this limitation by collecting the breath samples in customized bags and subsequently analyzing them by secondary electrospray ionization coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (SESI-HRMS). A total of<i>n</i>= 40 patients (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 3.5 y.o.) diagnosed with epilepsy and taking VPA were included in this study. The patients underwent three measurements: (i) serum concentrations of total and free VPA, (ii) real-time breath analysis and (iii) off-line analysis of exhaled breath collected in bags. The agreement between the real-time and the off-line breath analysis methods was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). CCC was computed for ten mass spectral predictors of VPA concentrations. Lin's CCC was >0.6 for all VPA-associated features, except for two low-signal intensity isotopic peaks. Finally, free and total serum VPA concentrations were predicted by cross validating the off-line data set. Support vector machine algorithms provided the most accurate predictions with a root mean square error of cross validation of 29.0 ± 7.4 mg l<sup>-1</sup>and 3.9 ± 1.4 mg l<sup>-1</sup>for total and free VPA (mean ± SD), respectively. As a secondary analysis, we explored whether exhaled metabolites previously associated with side-effects and response to medication could be rendered by the off-line analysis method. We found that five features associated with side effects showed a CCC > 0.6, whereas none of the drug response-associated peaks reached this cut-off. We conclude that the clinically relevant free fraction of VPA can be predicted by this combination of off-line breath collection with rapid SESI-HRMS analysis. This opens new possibilities for breath based TDM in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/acf782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of medications with a narrow therapeutic window is a common clinical practice to minimize toxic effects and maximize clinical outcomes. Routine analyses rely on the quantification of systemic blood concentrations of drugs. Alternative matrices such as exhaled breath are appealing because of their inherent non-invasive nature. This is especially the case for pediatric patients. We have recently showcased the possibility of predicting systemic concentrations of valproic acid (VPA), an anti-seizure medication by real-time breath analysis in two real clinical settings. This approach, however, comes with the limitation of the patients having to physically exhale into the mass spectrometer. This restricts the possibility of sampling from patients not capable or available to exhale into the mass spectrometer located on the hospital premises. In this work, we developed an alternative method to overcome this limitation by collecting the breath samples in customized bags and subsequently analyzing them by secondary electrospray ionization coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (SESI-HRMS). A total ofn= 40 patients (mean ± SD, 11.5 ± 3.5 y.o.) diagnosed with epilepsy and taking VPA were included in this study. The patients underwent three measurements: (i) serum concentrations of total and free VPA, (ii) real-time breath analysis and (iii) off-line analysis of exhaled breath collected in bags. The agreement between the real-time and the off-line breath analysis methods was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). CCC was computed for ten mass spectral predictors of VPA concentrations. Lin's CCC was >0.6 for all VPA-associated features, except for two low-signal intensity isotopic peaks. Finally, free and total serum VPA concentrations were predicted by cross validating the off-line data set. Support vector machine algorithms provided the most accurate predictions with a root mean square error of cross validation of 29.0 ± 7.4 mg l-1and 3.9 ± 1.4 mg l-1for total and free VPA (mean ± SD), respectively. As a secondary analysis, we explored whether exhaled metabolites previously associated with side-effects and response to medication could be rendered by the off-line analysis method. We found that five features associated with side effects showed a CCC > 0.6, whereas none of the drug response-associated peaks reached this cut-off. We conclude that the clinically relevant free fraction of VPA can be predicted by this combination of off-line breath collection with rapid SESI-HRMS analysis. This opens new possibilities for breath based TDM in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对癫痫儿童和青少年呼出气体的离线分析预测全身游离丙戊酸和总丙戊酸。
在狭窄的治疗窗口内对药物进行治疗药物监测(TDM)是一种常见的临床实践,可以最大限度地减少毒性影响并最大限度地提高临床结果。常规分析依赖于药物全身血液浓度的定量。呼气等替代基质因其固有的非侵入性而具有吸引力。儿科患者尤其如此。我们最近展示了在两种真实的临床环境中通过实时呼吸分析预测丙戊酸(VPA)全身浓度的可能性,丙戊酸是一种抗癫痫药物。然而,这种方法的局限性在于患者必须向质谱仪呼气。这限制了从无法或无法呼气的患者身上采样到位于医院内的质谱仪中的可能性。在这项工作中,我们开发了一种替代方法来克服这一限制,方法是将呼吸样本收集在定制的袋子中,然后通过二次电喷雾电离结合高分辨率质谱(SESI-HRMS)进行分析。本研究共纳入了40名被诊断为癫痫并服用VPA的患者(平均值±SD,11.5±3.5 y.o.)。患者接受了三项测量:(i)总VPA和游离VPA的血清浓度,(ii)实时呼吸分析和(iii)收集在袋中的呼出气体的离线分析。使用林一致性相关系数(CCC)评估实时和离线呼吸分析方法之间的一致性。计算了10个VPA浓度质谱预测因子的CCC。除两个低信号强度同位素峰外,所有VPA相关特征的林CCC均>0.6。最后,通过交叉验证离线数据集来预测游离和总血清VPA浓度。支持向量机算法提供了最准确的预测,总VPA和游离VPA的交叉验证均方根误差分别为29.0±7.4 mg l-1和3.9±1.4 mg l-1(平均值±SD)。作为二次分析,我们探讨了以前与副作用和药物反应相关的呼出代谢物是否可以通过离线分析方法呈现。我们发现,与副作用相关的五个特征显示CCC>0.6,而与药物反应相关的峰值均未达到该临界值。我们的结论是,通过离线呼吸采集和快速SESI-HRMS分析的结合,可以预测临床相关的VPA游离分数。这为基于呼吸的TDM在临床环境中开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of a probiotic preparation on idiopathic halitosis: a retrospective observational study. Halitosis in oral lichen planus patients. Effectiveness of a combination of laccase and green coffee extract on oral malodor: A comparative, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blind, parallel-group trial. Validation of a sensor system for the measurement of breath ammonia using selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Identifying viral infections through analysis of head space volatile organic compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1