There is a party in my head and no one is invited: Resting-state electrocortical activity and solitude.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12876
Chengli Huang, James W Butterworth, Anna J Finley, Douglas J Angus, Constantine Sedikides, Nicholas J Kelley
{"title":"There is a party in my head and no one is invited: Resting-state electrocortical activity and solitude.","authors":"Chengli Huang,&nbsp;James W Butterworth,&nbsp;Anna J Finley,&nbsp;Douglas J Angus,&nbsp;Constantine Sedikides,&nbsp;Nicholas J Kelley","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>What are the motivational underpinnings of solitude? We know from self-report studies that increases in solitude are associated with drops in approach motivation and rises in avoidance motivation, but only when solitude is experienced as non-self-determined (i.e., non-autonomous). However, the extent to which individual differences in solitude relate to neurophysiological markers of approach-avoidance motivation derived from resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) is unknown. These markers are Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, beta suppression, and midline Posterior versus Frontal EEG Theta Activity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed the relation among individual differences in the reasons for solitude (i.e., preference for solitude, motivation for solitude), approach-avoidance motivation, and resting-state EEG markers of approach-avoidance motivation (N = 115).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General preference for solitude was negatively related to approach motivation, observed in both self-reported measures and EEG markers of approach motivation. Self-determined solitude was positively related to both self-reported approach motivation and avoidance motivation in the social domain (i.e., friendship). Non-self-determined solitude was negatively associated with self-reported avoidance motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research was a preliminary attempt to address the neurophysiological underpinnings of solitude in the context of motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: What are the motivational underpinnings of solitude? We know from self-report studies that increases in solitude are associated with drops in approach motivation and rises in avoidance motivation, but only when solitude is experienced as non-self-determined (i.e., non-autonomous). However, the extent to which individual differences in solitude relate to neurophysiological markers of approach-avoidance motivation derived from resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) is unknown. These markers are Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, beta suppression, and midline Posterior versus Frontal EEG Theta Activity.

Method: We assessed the relation among individual differences in the reasons for solitude (i.e., preference for solitude, motivation for solitude), approach-avoidance motivation, and resting-state EEG markers of approach-avoidance motivation (N = 115).

Results: General preference for solitude was negatively related to approach motivation, observed in both self-reported measures and EEG markers of approach motivation. Self-determined solitude was positively related to both self-reported approach motivation and avoidance motivation in the social domain (i.e., friendship). Non-self-determined solitude was negatively associated with self-reported avoidance motivation.

Conclusion: This research was a preliminary attempt to address the neurophysiological underpinnings of solitude in the context of motivation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在我的脑海里有一个派对,没有人被邀请:静息状态下的电皮层活动和孤独。
目的:独处的动机基础是什么?我们从自我报告研究中得知,独处时间的增加与接近动机的下降和回避动机的上升有关,但这仅在独处是非自我决定的(即非自主的)情况下才会发生。然而,从静息状态脑电图(EEG)中得出的避近动机的神经生理标记与孤独的个体差异之间的关系程度尚不清楚。这些标记是额叶α不对称,β抑制,后脑中线与额叶脑电图θ活动。方法:评估个体差异在独处原因(即独处偏好、独处动机)、趋近回避动机和趋近回避动机静息状态EEG标记之间的关系(N = 115)。结果:一般偏好独处与接近动机呈负相关,在自我报告测量和接近动机的脑电图标记中都观察到。自我决定的孤独与自我报告的社交领域(即友谊)的接近动机和回避动机均呈正相关。非自我决定的孤独与自我报告的回避动机呈负相关。结论:本研究是在动机背景下解决孤独的神经生理学基础的初步尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the "Family Personality": Can Family Functioning Be Linked to Parent-Child Interpersonal Neural Synchronization? Neuroticism is Associated With Greater Affective Variability at High Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being, but With Lower Affective Variability at Low Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being. Issue Information The Connection Between Dark Traits and Emotional Intelligence: A Multistudy Person-Centered Approach. The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1