Clinical Outcome Discrimination in Pediatric ARDS by Chest Radiograph Severity Scoring.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9309611
Yu-Chun Yan, Wen-Han Hao, Feng-Sen Bai, Shuang Liu, Dong Qu, Xin-Yu Yuan
{"title":"Clinical Outcome Discrimination in Pediatric ARDS by Chest Radiograph Severity Scoring.","authors":"Yu-Chun Yan,&nbsp;Wen-Han Hao,&nbsp;Feng-Sen Bai,&nbsp;Shuang Liu,&nbsp;Dong Qu,&nbsp;Xin-Yu Yuan","doi":"10.1155/2022/9309611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no accurate radiological measurement to estimate the severity of pediatrics acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). We validated the effectiveness of an adult radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score in PARDS.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the severity and prognosis of PARDS based on a chest radiograph (CXR) RALE scoring method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) criteria were used to diagnose PARDS. General demographics, pulmonary complications, and 28-day mortality of the patients were recorded. Subgroups were compared by prognosis (survive and death) and etiology (infection and noninfection). Two observers calculated RALE independently. Each quadrant of CXR was scored by consolidation scores 0 (none alveolar opacity), 1 (extent <25%), 2 (extent 25%-50%), 3 (50%-75%), and 4 (>75%) and density scores 1 (hazy), 2 (moderate), and 3 (dense). Quadrant score equals consolidation score times density score. Total score equals to the sum of four quadrants scores. The ROC curve and survival curve were established, and the optimal cutoff score for discrimination prognosis was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>116 PARDS (72 boys and 44 girls) and 463 CXRs were enrolled. The median age was 25 months (5 months, 60.8 months) and with a mortality of 37.9% (44/116). The agreement between two independent observers was excellent (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Day 3 score was independently associated with better survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the curve of ROC was 0.773 (95% CI: 0.709-0.838). The cutoff score was 21 (sensitivity 71.7%, specificity 76.5%), and the hazard ratio (HR) was 9.268 (95% CI: 1.257-68.320). The pulmonary complication showed an HR of 3.678 (95% CI: 1.174-11.521) for the discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CXR RALE score can be used in PARDS for discriminating the prognosis and has a better agreement among radiologist and pediatrician. PARDS with pulmonary complications, day 3 score whether greater than 21 points, have a better predictive effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"9309611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124134/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9309611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is no accurate radiological measurement to estimate the severity of pediatrics acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). We validated the effectiveness of an adult radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score in PARDS.

Aim: To assess the severity and prognosis of PARDS based on a chest radiograph (CXR) RALE scoring method.

Methods: Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) criteria were used to diagnose PARDS. General demographics, pulmonary complications, and 28-day mortality of the patients were recorded. Subgroups were compared by prognosis (survive and death) and etiology (infection and noninfection). Two observers calculated RALE independently. Each quadrant of CXR was scored by consolidation scores 0 (none alveolar opacity), 1 (extent <25%), 2 (extent 25%-50%), 3 (50%-75%), and 4 (>75%) and density scores 1 (hazy), 2 (moderate), and 3 (dense). Quadrant score equals consolidation score times density score. Total score equals to the sum of four quadrants scores. The ROC curve and survival curve were established, and the optimal cutoff score for discrimination prognosis was set.

Results: 116 PARDS (72 boys and 44 girls) and 463 CXRs were enrolled. The median age was 25 months (5 months, 60.8 months) and with a mortality of 37.9% (44/116). The agreement between two independent observers was excellent (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Day 3 score was independently associated with better survival (p < 0.001). The area under the curve of ROC was 0.773 (95% CI: 0.709-0.838). The cutoff score was 21 (sensitivity 71.7%, specificity 76.5%), and the hazard ratio (HR) was 9.268 (95% CI: 1.257-68.320). The pulmonary complication showed an HR of 3.678 (95% CI: 1.174-11.521) for the discrimination.

Conclusion: CXR RALE score can be used in PARDS for discriminating the prognosis and has a better agreement among radiologist and pediatrician. PARDS with pulmonary complications, day 3 score whether greater than 21 points, have a better predictive effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸片严重程度评分对儿童ARDS临床结局的区别。
背景:目前尚无准确的放射学测量方法来评估儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征(PARDS)的严重程度。我们验证了PARDS中成人肺水肿(RALE)评分的x线评估的有效性。目的:应用胸片RALE评分法评价PARDS的严重程度及预后。方法:采用小儿急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC)标准诊断PARDS。记录患者的一般人口统计学、肺部并发症和28天死亡率。亚组比较预后(生存和死亡)和病因(感染和非感染)。两名观察员独立计算了RALE。每个CXR象限的实变评分为0(无肺泡不透明),1(程度75%),密度评分为1(朦胧),2(中度)和3(致密)。象限分数等于合并分数乘以密度分数。总分等于四个象限分数之和。建立ROC曲线和生存曲线,并设定判别预后的最佳截止评分。结果:共纳入116例PARDS(男生72例,女生44例)和463例cxr。中位年龄为25个月(5个月,60.8个月),死亡率为37.9%(44/116)。两个独立观察者之间的一致性非常好(ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99)。第3天评分与更好的生存率独立相关(p < 0.001)。ROC曲线下面积为0.773 (95% CI: 0.709 ~ 0.838)。截止评分为21分(敏感性71.7%,特异性76.5%),风险比(HR)为9.268 (95% CI: 1.257 ~ 68.320)。肺部并发症的风险比为3.678 (95% CI: 1.174 ~ 11.521)。结论:CXR RALE评分可用于判断PARDS的预后,在放射科医生和儿科医生之间有较好的一致性。PARDS合并肺部并发症,第3天评分是否大于21分,预测效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Vitamin D With GPX4 and Iron Parameters in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Case-Control Study. Geographic Differences in Availability and Access to Care Services for Asthma and COPD: Case Study of Vancouver Coastal Health, British Columbia. Clinical Analysis of 32 Cases of Subglottic Benign Airway Stenosis Treated With Montgomery T Silicone Stent. Nomograms for Predicting High Hospitalization Costs and Prolonged Stay among Hospitalized Patients with pAECOPD. Gentiopicroside Ameliorates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury via Inhibiting Inflammatory Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1