Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702
Ida Westberg, Frida Meijer Carlsen, Ida Elisabeth Johansen, Bent Larsen Petersen
{"title":"Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.","authors":"Ida Westberg,&nbsp;Frida Meijer Carlsen,&nbsp;Ida Elisabeth Johansen,&nbsp;Bent Larsen Petersen","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3-4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard <i>Arabidopsis thaliana At</i>U6-1 promotor with endogenous potato <i>St</i>U6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct (<i>Sp</i>Cas9/<i>St</i>U6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC<sub>4</sub>C<sub>5</sub>TTGGAGC<sub>12</sub>AAAAC<sub>17</sub>TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_<i>Pm</i>CDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (Solanum tuberosum), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3-4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard Arabidopsis thaliana AtU6-1 promotor with endogenous potato StU6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct (SpCas9/StU6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC4C5TTGGAGC12AAAAC17TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_PmCDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马铃薯原生质体基因组编辑优化的胞嘧啶碱基编辑器。
在这项研究中,我们生成并比较了三种为马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum)量身定制的胞苷碱基编辑器(CBEs),它们使原生质体库中所有等位基因的C-to-T转化率高达43%。此前,通过聚乙二醇介导的原生质体CRISPR/Cas9转化,然后外植体再生,成功地产生了基因编辑的马铃薯植株。在一项研究中,用内源马铃薯StU6启动子取代标准拟南芥AtU6-1启动子驱动gRNA的表达,获得了3-4倍的编辑效率提高。在这里,我们使用这个优化的结构(SpCas9/StU6-1::gRNA1,目标gRNA序列GGTC4C5TTGGAGC12AAAAC17TGG)来生成马铃薯定制的CBEs,并在Desiree品种中测试了颗粒结合淀粉合成酶1基因的C-to-T碱基编辑。首先,将化脓性链球菌Cas9转化为(D10A) nickase (nCas9)。接下来,将来自人类hAPOBEC3A (A3A)、大鼠(evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1)或海七鳃鳗(evo_PmCDA1) (CDA1)的三种胞嘧啶脱氨酶中的一种c端融合到nCas9和尿嘧啶- dna糖基酶抑制剂上,每个模块之间间隔有灵活的连接物。cbe整体效率较高,其中A3A具有最佳的整体碱基编辑活性,C4、C5和C12的c -t转化率分别为34.5%、34.5%和27%,而CDA1在C4、C5和C12的c -t转化率分别为34.5%、34%和14.25%。rA1在C4和C5上的平均碱基编辑活性分别为18.75%和19%,是唯一在C12上没有C-to-T转化的碱基编辑器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knockout mutation in TaD27 enhances number of productive tillers in hexaploid wheat. Targeting DLBCL by mutation-specific disruption of cancer-driving oncogenes. The potential of HBV cure: an overview of CRISPR-mediated HBV gene disruption. Use of paired Cas9-NG nickase and truncated sgRNAs for single-nucleotide microbial genome editing. Making gene editing accessible in resource limited environments: recommendations to guide a first-time user.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1