Variations in the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. A nationwide survey

José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Mireya Fernández-Fournier , Antoni Plana-Blanco , Luis Lassaletta
{"title":"Variations in the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. A nationwide survey","authors":"José Manuel Morales-Puebla ,&nbsp;Mireya Fernández-Fournier ,&nbsp;Antoni Plana-Blanco ,&nbsp;Luis Lassaletta","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute peripheral facial paralysis may be diagnosed and treated by different specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aim of this study was to explore the variability in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (BP) and </span>Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) among different medical specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>An anonymous nationwide online survey was distributed among the Spanish Societies of Otorhinolaryngology<span> (ORL), Neurology (NRL) and Family and </span></span>Community Medicine (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1039 responses were obtained. 98% agreed on using corticosteroids, ORL using higher doses than NRL and GP. Among all, only 13% prescribed antivirals in BP routinely, while 31% prescribed them occasionally. The percentage of specialists not using antivirals for RHS was 5% of ORL, 11% of NRL, and 23% of GP (GP vs. NRL p = 0.001; GP vs. ORL p &lt; 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0,002). 99% recommended eye care. Exercises as chewing gum or blowing balloons were prescribed by 45% of the participants with statistically significant differences among the three specialties (GP vs. NRL p = 0.021; GP vs. ORL p &lt; 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is general agreement in the use of corticosteroids and recommending eye care as part of the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. Yet, there are discrepancies in corticosteroids dosage, use of antivirals and recommendation of facial exercises among specialties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 1","pages":"Pages 31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173573523000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acute peripheral facial paralysis may be diagnosed and treated by different specialists.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the variability in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (BP) and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) among different medical specialties.

Methods

An anonymous nationwide online survey was distributed among the Spanish Societies of Otorhinolaryngology (ORL), Neurology (NRL) and Family and Community Medicine (GP).

Results

1039 responses were obtained. 98% agreed on using corticosteroids, ORL using higher doses than NRL and GP. Among all, only 13% prescribed antivirals in BP routinely, while 31% prescribed them occasionally. The percentage of specialists not using antivirals for RHS was 5% of ORL, 11% of NRL, and 23% of GP (GP vs. NRL p = 0.001; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0,002). 99% recommended eye care. Exercises as chewing gum or blowing balloons were prescribed by 45% of the participants with statistically significant differences among the three specialties (GP vs. NRL p = 0.021; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0.002).

Conclusion

There is general agreement in the use of corticosteroids and recommending eye care as part of the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. Yet, there are discrepancies in corticosteroids dosage, use of antivirals and recommendation of facial exercises among specialties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性周围性面瘫治疗的变化。一项全国性的调查。
背景:急性周围性面瘫可由不同的专家进行诊断和治疗。目的:本研究旨在探讨不同医学专业治疗Bell麻痹(BP)和Ramsay-Hunt综合征(RHS)的差异性。方法:一项匿名的全国性在线调查在西班牙耳鼻喉科学会(ORL)、神经病学学会(NRL)和家庭与社区医学会(GP)中进行。结果:获得1039个回复。98%的人同意使用皮质类固醇,ORL使用比NRL和GP更高的剂量。其中,只有13%的人常规服用抗病毒药物,31%的人偶尔服用。未使用抗病毒药物治疗RHS的专家比例为ORL的5%、NRL的11%和GP的23%(GP与NRL相比,p = 0.001;GP与ORL p 结论:使用皮质类固醇和推荐眼部护理作为治疗急性周围性面瘫的一部分是普遍一致的。然而,不同专业的皮质类固醇剂量、抗病毒药物的使用和面部锻炼的建议存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fenestrated internal yugular vein crossed by spinal nerve. Transethmoidal meningoencephalocele: Endoscopic and radiological morphology. Retrolabyrinthine approach to the lateral skull base: The value of preoperative temporal bone CT analysis Executive Summary of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management The current situation of tutoring in specialised training in otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery in Spain. Where are we? Where do we want to go?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1