José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Mireya Fernández-Fournier , Antoni Plana-Blanco , Luis Lassaletta
{"title":"Variations in the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. A nationwide survey","authors":"José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Mireya Fernández-Fournier , Antoni Plana-Blanco , Luis Lassaletta","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute peripheral facial paralysis may be diagnosed and treated by different specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aim of this study was to explore the variability in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (BP) and </span>Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) among different medical specialties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>An anonymous nationwide online survey was distributed among the Spanish Societies of Otorhinolaryngology<span> (ORL), Neurology (NRL) and Family and </span></span>Community Medicine (GP).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1039 responses were obtained. 98% agreed on using corticosteroids, ORL using higher doses than NRL and GP. Among all, only 13% prescribed antivirals in BP routinely, while 31% prescribed them occasionally. The percentage of specialists not using antivirals for RHS was 5% of ORL, 11% of NRL, and 23% of GP (GP vs. NRL p = 0.001; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0,002). 99% recommended eye care. Exercises as chewing gum or blowing balloons were prescribed by 45% of the participants with statistically significant differences among the three specialties (GP vs. NRL p = 0.021; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is general agreement in the use of corticosteroids and recommending eye care as part of the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. Yet, there are discrepancies in corticosteroids dosage, use of antivirals and recommendation of facial exercises among specialties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 1","pages":"Pages 31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173573523000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Acute peripheral facial paralysis may be diagnosed and treated by different specialists.
Objective
The aim of this study was to explore the variability in the treatment of Bell’s palsy (BP) and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) among different medical specialties.
Methods
An anonymous nationwide online survey was distributed among the Spanish Societies of Otorhinolaryngology (ORL), Neurology (NRL) and Family and Community Medicine (GP).
Results
1039 responses were obtained. 98% agreed on using corticosteroids, ORL using higher doses than NRL and GP. Among all, only 13% prescribed antivirals in BP routinely, while 31% prescribed them occasionally. The percentage of specialists not using antivirals for RHS was 5% of ORL, 11% of NRL, and 23% of GP (GP vs. NRL p = 0.001; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0,002). 99% recommended eye care. Exercises as chewing gum or blowing balloons were prescribed by 45% of the participants with statistically significant differences among the three specialties (GP vs. NRL p = 0.021; GP vs. ORL p < 0.0001; NRL vs. ORL p = 0.002).
Conclusion
There is general agreement in the use of corticosteroids and recommending eye care as part of the treatment of acute peripheral facial paralysis. Yet, there are discrepancies in corticosteroids dosage, use of antivirals and recommendation of facial exercises among specialties.
背景:急性周围性面瘫可由不同的专家进行诊断和治疗。目的:本研究旨在探讨不同医学专业治疗Bell麻痹(BP)和Ramsay-Hunt综合征(RHS)的差异性。方法:一项匿名的全国性在线调查在西班牙耳鼻喉科学会(ORL)、神经病学学会(NRL)和家庭与社区医学会(GP)中进行。结果:获得1039个回复。98%的人同意使用皮质类固醇,ORL使用比NRL和GP更高的剂量。其中,只有13%的人常规服用抗病毒药物,31%的人偶尔服用。未使用抗病毒药物治疗RHS的专家比例为ORL的5%、NRL的11%和GP的23%(GP与NRL相比,p = 0.001;GP与ORL p 结论:使用皮质类固醇和推荐眼部护理作为治疗急性周围性面瘫的一部分是普遍一致的。然而,不同专业的皮质类固醇剂量、抗病毒药物的使用和面部锻炼的建议存在差异。