Is suicide a mental health, public health or societal problem?

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000888
Digvijay Goel, Brian Dennis, Sarah K McKenzie
{"title":"Is suicide a mental health, public health or societal problem?","authors":"Digvijay Goel,&nbsp;Brian Dennis,&nbsp;Sarah K McKenzie","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Suicide is a complex phenomenon wherein multiple parameters intersect: psychological, medical, moral, religious, social, economic and political. Over the decades, however, it has been increasingly and almost exclusively come to be viewed through a biomedical prism. Colonized thus by health and more specifically mental health professionals, alternative and complimentary approaches have been excluded from the discourse. The review questions many basic premises, which have been taken as given in this context, particularly the '90 percent statistic' derived from methodologically flawed psychological autopsy studies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>An alternative perspective posits that suicide is a societal problem which has been expropriated by health professionals, with little to show for the efficacy of public health interventions such as national suicide prevention plans, which continue to be ritually rolled out despite a consistent record of repeated failures. This view is supported by macro-level data from studies across national borders.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The current framing of suicide as a public health and mental health problem, amenable to biomedical interventions has stifled seminal discourse on the subject. We need to jettison this tunnel vision and move on to a more inclusive approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":"36 5","pages":"352-359"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: Suicide is a complex phenomenon wherein multiple parameters intersect: psychological, medical, moral, religious, social, economic and political. Over the decades, however, it has been increasingly and almost exclusively come to be viewed through a biomedical prism. Colonized thus by health and more specifically mental health professionals, alternative and complimentary approaches have been excluded from the discourse. The review questions many basic premises, which have been taken as given in this context, particularly the '90 percent statistic' derived from methodologically flawed psychological autopsy studies.

Recent findings: An alternative perspective posits that suicide is a societal problem which has been expropriated by health professionals, with little to show for the efficacy of public health interventions such as national suicide prevention plans, which continue to be ritually rolled out despite a consistent record of repeated failures. This view is supported by macro-level data from studies across national borders.

Summary: The current framing of suicide as a public health and mental health problem, amenable to biomedical interventions has stifled seminal discourse on the subject. We need to jettison this tunnel vision and move on to a more inclusive approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀是心理健康、公共健康还是社会问题?
回顾目的:自杀是一个复杂的现象,其中多个参数交叉:心理,医学,道德,宗教,社会,经济和政治。然而,在过去的几十年里,人们越来越多地、几乎完全地从生物医学的角度来看待它。因此,由卫生专业人员,更具体地说是精神卫生专业人员主导,替代和补充方法被排除在讨论之外。这篇综述对许多基本前提提出了质疑,这些前提被认为是在这种背景下给出的,特别是从方法论上有缺陷的心理解剖研究中得出的“90%的统计数据”。最近的发现:另一种观点认为,自杀是一个社会问题,已被卫生专业人员征用,几乎没有显示公共卫生干预措施的有效性,如国家自杀预防计划,尽管屡有失败的记录,但仍在仪式性地推出。这一观点得到了跨国研究的宏观数据的支持。摘要:目前将自杀定义为公共卫生和精神健康问题,可以接受生物医学干预,这扼杀了对该主题的开创性论述。我们需要抛弃这种狭隘的眼光,转而采取一种更具包容性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Mortality in people with mental disorders in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Early intervention for eating disorders. Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions. Systematic review of the epidemiology of eating disorders in the Arab world. Eating disorders: etiology, risk factors, and suggestions for prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1