首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
Co-occurrence of personality disorders and anxiety disorders. 人格障碍和焦虑症的共现。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001031
Milan Latas, Nevena Baščarević, Dušanka Vučinić Latas

Purpose of review: This review explores the high co-occurrence between personality disorders (PDs) and anxiety disorders (ADs), focusing on clinical implications, the frequency of their association, and the challenges these comorbidities pose for diagnosis and treatment. In addition, this review highlights recent research findings and the need for better therapeutic strategies.

Recent findings: Contemporary studies have confirmed a strong association between PDs and ADs, particularly borderline personality disorder (BPD), which shows an 85% comorbidity with anxiety disorders. Gender differences are also observed, with women generally exhibiting higher rates of co-occurring psychiatric conditions. These comorbidities contribute to increased symptom severity, a higher suicide risk, and worse long-term outcomes. Recent clinical trials have shown positive results in managing these disorders. However, treatment approaches remain inconsistent, and further research is needed to refine these strategies.

Summary: The co-occurrence of PDs and ADs complicates diagnosis and treatment, leading to worse outcomes. Although promising therapies exist, the current lack of a standardized treatment approach for this comorbid population highlights the need for further research. Future studies should explore more targeted treatment options, causal mechanisms linking PDs and ADs, and potential benefits of personalized interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

综述目的:本综述探讨了人格障碍(pd)和焦虑症(ADs)的高共发率,重点关注其临床意义、关联频率以及这些共发率对诊断和治疗的挑战。此外,这篇综述强调了最近的研究结果和需要更好的治疗策略。最近的发现:当代研究已经证实了pd和ad之间的密切联系,特别是边缘性人格障碍(BPD),其中85%与焦虑症共病。性别差异也被观察到,女性通常表现出较高的同时出现精神疾病的比率。这些合并症导致症状严重程度增加、自杀风险增加和长期预后恶化。最近的临床试验显示在治疗这些疾病方面取得了积极的成果。然而,治疗方法仍然不一致,需要进一步的研究来完善这些策略。摘要:PDs和ad的共存使诊断和治疗复杂化,导致预后较差。尽管有希望的治疗方法存在,但目前缺乏针对这一合并症人群的标准化治疗方法,这突出了进一步研究的必要性。未来的研究应探索更有针对性的治疗方案,pd和ad之间的因果机制,以及个性化干预的潜在益处,以改善临床结果。
{"title":"Co-occurrence of personality disorders and anxiety disorders.","authors":"Milan Latas, Nevena Baščarević, Dušanka Vučinić Latas","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001031","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the high co-occurrence between personality disorders (PDs) and anxiety disorders (ADs), focusing on clinical implications, the frequency of their association, and the challenges these comorbidities pose for diagnosis and treatment. In addition, this review highlights recent research findings and the need for better therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Contemporary studies have confirmed a strong association between PDs and ADs, particularly borderline personality disorder (BPD), which shows an 85% comorbidity with anxiety disorders. Gender differences are also observed, with women generally exhibiting higher rates of co-occurring psychiatric conditions. These comorbidities contribute to increased symptom severity, a higher suicide risk, and worse long-term outcomes. Recent clinical trials have shown positive results in managing these disorders. However, treatment approaches remain inconsistent, and further research is needed to refine these strategies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The co-occurrence of PDs and ADs complicates diagnosis and treatment, leading to worse outcomes. Although promising therapies exist, the current lack of a standardized treatment approach for this comorbid population highlights the need for further research. Future studies should explore more targeted treatment options, causal mechanisms linking PDs and ADs, and potential benefits of personalized interventions to improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144706672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current evidence on immune-driven depression. 目前关于免疫驱动抑郁症的证据。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001047
Céline Wessa, Maria S Simon, Livia De Picker

Purpose of review: This review summarizes recent evidence on immune-driven depression, a subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) characterized by low-grade inflammation, energy-related symptoms and metabolic disturbances. This subtype is associated with worse outcomes and distinct antidepressant responses. Considering inflammatory features may help clinicians tailor MDD management, particularly by informing lifestyle measures and targeted interventions. The review highlights studies describing features of immune-driven depression, discussing mechanistic pathways, and evaluating mechanism-based interventions.

Recent findings: Novel mechanistic evidence includes sex-specific associations between inflammatory markers and depressive symptoms, effects of inflammation on motivation and immuno-metabolic interactions. These findings have informed stratified and enriched trial designs preselecting patients with inflammatory profiles. International initiatives integrate clinical, biomarker, neuroimaging and genetic data to define reproducible signatures. Novel interventions include GLP-1 receptor agonists, more focus on dopaminergic agents and low-dose interleukin-2.

Summary: Current evidence supports immune-driven depression as a clinically relevant MDD subtype. Indicators such as hsCRP, comorbid metabolic or inflammatory conditions and motivational anhedonia may help clinicians recognize at-risk patients. Most intervention trials remain limited by small, heterogeneous samples and nonspecific outcome measures. Advances in biomarker-guided stratification represent important steps toward precision psychiatry, aiming to develop tailored, mechanism-based treatments for MDD.

综述目的:本综述总结了最近关于免疫驱动抑郁症的证据,免疫驱动抑郁症是一种以低度炎症、能量相关症状和代谢紊乱为特征的重性抑郁症(MDD)亚型。这种亚型与较差的预后和明显的抗抑郁反应相关。考虑炎症特征可能有助于临床医生定制MDD管理,特别是通过告知生活方式措施和有针对性的干预措施。这篇综述强调了描述免疫驱动抑郁症特征的研究,讨论了机制途径,并评估了基于机制的干预措施。最新发现:新的机制证据包括炎症标志物和抑郁症状之间的性别特异性关联,炎症对动机和免疫代谢相互作用的影响。这些发现为分层和丰富的试验设计预先选择具有炎症特征的患者提供了信息。国际倡议整合临床、生物标志物、神经成像和遗传数据来定义可重复的特征。新的干预措施包括GLP-1受体激动剂,更多地关注多巴胺能药物和低剂量白介素-2。总结:目前的证据支持免疫驱动型抑郁症是临床相关的重度抑郁症亚型。诸如hsCRP、共病代谢或炎症条件和动机性快感缺乏等指标可以帮助临床医生识别高危患者。大多数干预试验仍然受到小样本、异质样本和非特异性结果测量的限制。生物标志物引导分层的进展代表了精确精神病学的重要一步,旨在为重度抑郁症开发量身定制的、基于机制的治疗方法。
{"title":"Current evidence on immune-driven depression.","authors":"Céline Wessa, Maria S Simon, Livia De Picker","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001047","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes recent evidence on immune-driven depression, a subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) characterized by low-grade inflammation, energy-related symptoms and metabolic disturbances. This subtype is associated with worse outcomes and distinct antidepressant responses. Considering inflammatory features may help clinicians tailor MDD management, particularly by informing lifestyle measures and targeted interventions. The review highlights studies describing features of immune-driven depression, discussing mechanistic pathways, and evaluating mechanism-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Novel mechanistic evidence includes sex-specific associations between inflammatory markers and depressive symptoms, effects of inflammation on motivation and immuno-metabolic interactions. These findings have informed stratified and enriched trial designs preselecting patients with inflammatory profiles. International initiatives integrate clinical, biomarker, neuroimaging and genetic data to define reproducible signatures. Novel interventions include GLP-1 receptor agonists, more focus on dopaminergic agents and low-dose interleukin-2.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current evidence supports immune-driven depression as a clinically relevant MDD subtype. Indicators such as hsCRP, comorbid metabolic or inflammatory conditions and motivational anhedonia may help clinicians recognize at-risk patients. Most intervention trials remain limited by small, heterogeneous samples and nonspecific outcome measures. Advances in biomarker-guided stratification represent important steps toward precision psychiatry, aiming to develop tailored, mechanism-based treatments for MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"8-18"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12672047/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145488313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mentalization-based therapy for personality disorder in adolescents. 青少年人格障碍的心理治疗。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001033
Sebastian Simonsen, Sune Bo, Carla Sharp

Purpose of review: Mentalization-based therapy for adolescents (MBT-A) is a treatment approach that aligns well with dimensional models of personality disorders. This article reviews recent literature on mentalizing and MBT, proposing ways in which findings may inform future research and clinical innovations.

Recent findings: There have been few new treatment studies and meta-analyses, and the evidence generally does not support the superiority of MBT-A over other well structured treatments for personality disorder in adolescents. Long-term follow-up studies suggest heterotypic continuity of personality disorder (PD) and indicate that discrepancies between adolescent and parent reporting may point to important mentalizing problems. A pilot study of MBT-A for conduct disorder has been published and shows promising results, despite a high dropout rate.

Summary: MBT was originally developed for BPD in adults, but it is increasingly being recognized as a transdiagnostic common-factor model relevant to many conditions, such as those affecting adolescents who have experienced childhood adversity and juveniles with persistent aggressive behavior. For the field to progress further, there is a strong need for more research and clinical innovation, which should continue to move beyond categorical classification and approach disorder and alleviation of suffering from a developmental and social-ecological starting point.

综述目的:青少年心理化治疗(MBT-A)是一种符合人格障碍维度模型的治疗方法。本文回顾了最近关于心智化和MBT的文献,提出了研究结果可能为未来研究和临床创新提供信息的方法。最近的发现:很少有新的治疗研究和荟萃分析,证据通常不支持MBT-A优于其他结构良好的青少年人格障碍治疗。长期随访研究表明,人格障碍(PD)的异型连续性,并表明青少年和父母报告之间的差异可能指向重要的心理问题。一项针对品行障碍的MBT-A的试点研究已经发表,并显示出有希望的结果,尽管辍学率很高。摘要:MBT最初是为成人BPD开发的,但它越来越被认为是一种跨诊断的共同因素模型,与许多疾病相关,例如那些影响童年经历逆境的青少年和具有持续攻击行为的青少年。为了使这一领域进一步发展,迫切需要更多的研究和临床创新,这些研究和创新应该继续超越分类分类,从发展和社会生态的角度出发,研究障碍和减轻痛苦。
{"title":"Mentalization-based therapy for personality disorder in adolescents.","authors":"Sebastian Simonsen, Sune Bo, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001033","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Mentalization-based therapy for adolescents (MBT-A) is a treatment approach that aligns well with dimensional models of personality disorders. This article reviews recent literature on mentalizing and MBT, proposing ways in which findings may inform future research and clinical innovations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There have been few new treatment studies and meta-analyses, and the evidence generally does not support the superiority of MBT-A over other well structured treatments for personality disorder in adolescents. Long-term follow-up studies suggest heterotypic continuity of personality disorder (PD) and indicate that discrepancies between adolescent and parent reporting may point to important mentalizing problems. A pilot study of MBT-A for conduct disorder has been published and shows promising results, despite a high dropout rate.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>MBT was originally developed for BPD in adults, but it is increasingly being recognized as a transdiagnostic common-factor model relevant to many conditions, such as those affecting adolescents who have experienced childhood adversity and juveniles with persistent aggressive behavior. For the field to progress further, there is a strong need for more research and clinical innovation, which should continue to move beyond categorical classification and approach disorder and alleviation of suffering from a developmental and social-ecological starting point.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144706674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State-of-the-art treatment of postpartum bipolar disorder. 最先进的产后双相情感障碍治疗。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001049
Tamás Kurimay, Anett Pelikán, Vera Tory

Purpose of review: To summarize recent updates in the treatment of postpartum bipolar disorder (PBD).PBD requires timely and comprehensive management, as childbirth is a period of elevated relapse risk in women with preexisting illness and may also mark first-onset presentations. Episodes can manifest as depression, mixed states, mania, or psychosis, with severe consequences for maternal safety, infant well being, and early bonding. Sleep loss around labor and postpartum further increases vulnerability.

Recent findings: PBD demands a multifaceted therapeutic approach, with pharmacotherapy as the cornerstone. Lithium, lamotrigine, and selected second-generation antipsychotics remain key options, guided by efficacy, lactation safety, and individualized risk-benefit assessment. Structured relapse-prevention planning, sleep protection, and support for mother-infant bonding are crucial nonpharmacological elements. Early, targeted intervention reduces relapse and suicide risk while supporting maternal functioning and family stability.

Summary: Beyond optimized pharmacological care, recent research highlights a treatment continuum spanning pregnancy and postpartum. Multidisciplinary collaboration across psychiatry, obstetrics, and neonatal care is crucial to ensure maternal safety, optimize infant outcomes, and support families. Integrating lived experience and patient collaboration enhances relevance. A life-course perspective across reproduction, combining biological and psychosocial insights, signals a shift toward holistic, personalized, precision-based strategies in managing PBD.

综述的目的:总结产后双相情感障碍(PBD)治疗的最新进展。PBD需要及时和全面的管理,因为分娩是已有疾病的妇女复发风险升高的时期,也可能标志着首发表现。发作可表现为抑郁、混合状态、躁狂或精神病,对产妇安全、婴儿健康和早期结合造成严重后果。分娩和产后睡眠不足会进一步增加脆弱性。最近的研究发现:PBD需要以药物治疗为基础的多方面治疗方法。锂、拉莫三嗪和选定的第二代抗精神病药物仍然是关键的选择,以疗效、哺乳安全性和个性化风险-收益评估为指导。结构化的复发预防计划、睡眠保护和对母婴关系的支持是至关重要的非药物因素。早期有针对性的干预可减少复发和自杀风险,同时支持孕产妇功能和家庭稳定。总结:除了优化药理学护理,最近的研究强调了一个治疗连续跨越妊娠和产后。跨精神病学、产科和新生儿护理的多学科合作对于确保孕产妇安全、优化婴儿结局和支持家庭至关重要。将生活经验和患者协作结合起来可以增强相关性。从整个生殖过程的角度,结合生物学和社会心理的见解,标志着在PBD管理中向整体、个性化、精确的策略转变。
{"title":"State-of-the-art treatment of postpartum bipolar disorder.","authors":"Tamás Kurimay, Anett Pelikán, Vera Tory","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001049","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize recent updates in the treatment of postpartum bipolar disorder (PBD).PBD requires timely and comprehensive management, as childbirth is a period of elevated relapse risk in women with preexisting illness and may also mark first-onset presentations. Episodes can manifest as depression, mixed states, mania, or psychosis, with severe consequences for maternal safety, infant well being, and early bonding. Sleep loss around labor and postpartum further increases vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PBD demands a multifaceted therapeutic approach, with pharmacotherapy as the cornerstone. Lithium, lamotrigine, and selected second-generation antipsychotics remain key options, guided by efficacy, lactation safety, and individualized risk-benefit assessment. Structured relapse-prevention planning, sleep protection, and support for mother-infant bonding are crucial nonpharmacological elements. Early, targeted intervention reduces relapse and suicide risk while supporting maternal functioning and family stability.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Beyond optimized pharmacological care, recent research highlights a treatment continuum spanning pregnancy and postpartum. Multidisciplinary collaboration across psychiatry, obstetrics, and neonatal care is crucial to ensure maternal safety, optimize infant outcomes, and support families. Integrating lived experience and patient collaboration enhances relevance. A life-course perspective across reproduction, combining biological and psychosocial insights, signals a shift toward holistic, personalized, precision-based strategies in managing PBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and risks of artificial intelligence chatbots for anxiety and depression: a narrative review of recent clinical studies. 人工智能聊天机器人治疗焦虑和抑郁的功效和风险:近期临床研究的叙述性回顾。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048
Rebekah Bodner, Katherine Lim, Renee Schneider, John Torous

Purpose of review: The rapidly growing environment of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated interest in its potential use for improving the efficiency and efficacy of the healthcare industry. Specifically, there has been a growing interest in AI role mental healthcare for common disorders like anxiety and depression. However, it remains unclear whether current evidence is sufficient to determine efficacy and safety of AI chatbots in clinical practice.

Recent findings: Most studies reported symptom reductions on validated anxiety and depression measures; however, the majority lacked appropriate active control conditions, featured small and demographically narrow samples, and used inconsistent outcome metrics, limiting generalizability and replication. Reporting of adverse events was rare, and potential risks such as emotional dependence and parasocial relationships were largely unexamined.

Summary: This paper offers a review of the recent literature (February 2024 and July 2025) regarding AI effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression. While findings suggest that AI chatbots are feasible and acceptable to users, current evidence is insufficient to determine their efficacy or safety in clinical practice.

综述目的:快速发展的人工智能(AI)环境加速了人们对其在提高医疗保健行业效率和功效方面的潜在用途的兴趣。具体来说,人们对人工智能在焦虑和抑郁等常见疾病中的作用越来越感兴趣。然而,目前尚不清楚目前的证据是否足以确定人工智能聊天机器人在临床实践中的有效性和安全性。最近的发现:大多数研究报告了有效的焦虑和抑郁措施的症状减轻;然而,大多数缺乏适当的主动控制条件,样本量小且人口统计学范围窄,使用不一致的结果指标,限制了推广和复制。不良事件的报道很少,潜在的风险,如情感依赖和副社会关系,在很大程度上没有得到检查。摘要:本文回顾了最近关于人工智能治疗焦虑和抑郁的有效性的文献(2024年2月和2025年7月)。虽然研究结果表明人工智能聊天机器人对用户来说是可行和可接受的,但目前的证据不足以确定其在临床实践中的有效性或安全性。
{"title":"Efficacy and risks of artificial intelligence chatbots for anxiety and depression: a narrative review of recent clinical studies.","authors":"Rebekah Bodner, Katherine Lim, Renee Schneider, John Torous","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The rapidly growing environment of artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated interest in its potential use for improving the efficiency and efficacy of the healthcare industry. Specifically, there has been a growing interest in AI role mental healthcare for common disorders like anxiety and depression. However, it remains unclear whether current evidence is sufficient to determine efficacy and safety of AI chatbots in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most studies reported symptom reductions on validated anxiety and depression measures; however, the majority lacked appropriate active control conditions, featured small and demographically narrow samples, and used inconsistent outcome metrics, limiting generalizability and replication. Reporting of adverse events was rare, and potential risks such as emotional dependence and parasocial relationships were largely unexamined.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This paper offers a review of the recent literature (February 2024 and July 2025) regarding AI effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression. While findings suggest that AI chatbots are feasible and acceptable to users, current evidence is insufficient to determine their efficacy or safety in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conspiracy theories, personality dimensions and personality disorders. 阴谋论,人格维度和人格障碍。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001037
Vladan Starcevic, Aleksandar Janca

Purpose of review: Conspiracy theories are not a recent phenomenon, but their dissemination has been facilitated by the internet and modern means of communication such as social media. This article reviews personality-based factors that increase the likelihood of endorsing conspiracy theories.

Recent findings: Most studies used a correlational approach and examined personality traits and dimensions rather than personality disorders. The strongest and most consistent relationships were found between endorsement of conspiracy theories and suspiciousness and paranoid ideation, pseudoscientific tendencies and beliefs, schizotypal personality traits and narcissism. Similar personality characteristics were identified as correlates of the endorsement of the specific COVID-19 conspiracy theories, but antisocial personality traits have also been reported in this context. Epistemic mistrust has emerged as arguably the key factor that facilitates endorsement of conspiracy theories. Schizotypal, paranoid, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders were more likely to accompany endorsement of conspiracy theories than other types of personality disorders.

Summary: Although correlation does not imply causation, recent work has identified personality-related characteristics that confer an increased risk of espousing conspiracy theories. Further research is necessary to ascertain how this vulnerability could be decreased, thus minimizing the harms of conspiracy theories that are inflicted on their adherents and broader society.

综述目的:阴谋论不是最近才出现的现象,但互联网和社交媒体等现代通信手段促进了阴谋论的传播。这篇文章回顾了基于个性的因素,这些因素增加了支持阴谋论的可能性。最近的发现:大多数研究使用相关性方法,检查人格特征和维度,而不是人格障碍。研究发现,认同阴谋论与多疑和偏执观念、伪科学倾向和信仰、分裂型人格特征和自恋之间存在最强烈、最一致的关系。相似的人格特征被确定为支持特定的COVID-19阴谋论的相关因素,但在这种情况下也报告了反社会人格特征。认知上的不信任可以说是促成阴谋论得到认可的关键因素。与其他类型的人格障碍相比,分裂型、偏执型、反社会型、边缘型和自恋型人格障碍更有可能伴随着阴谋论的认可。摘要:虽然相关性并不意味着因果关系,但最近的研究已经确定了与人格相关的特征,这些特征赋予了支持阴谋论的风险增加。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定如何减少这种脆弱性,从而最大限度地减少阴谋论对其追随者和更广泛社会造成的危害。
{"title":"Conspiracy theories, personality dimensions and personality disorders.","authors":"Vladan Starcevic, Aleksandar Janca","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001037","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Conspiracy theories are not a recent phenomenon, but their dissemination has been facilitated by the internet and modern means of communication such as social media. This article reviews personality-based factors that increase the likelihood of endorsing conspiracy theories.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most studies used a correlational approach and examined personality traits and dimensions rather than personality disorders. The strongest and most consistent relationships were found between endorsement of conspiracy theories and suspiciousness and paranoid ideation, pseudoscientific tendencies and beliefs, schizotypal personality traits and narcissism. Similar personality characteristics were identified as correlates of the endorsement of the specific COVID-19 conspiracy theories, but antisocial personality traits have also been reported in this context. Epistemic mistrust has emerged as arguably the key factor that facilitates endorsement of conspiracy theories. Schizotypal, paranoid, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders were more likely to accompany endorsement of conspiracy theories than other types of personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although correlation does not imply causation, recent work has identified personality-related characteristics that confer an increased risk of espousing conspiracy theories. Further research is necessary to ascertain how this vulnerability could be decreased, thus minimizing the harms of conspiracy theories that are inflicted on their adherents and broader society.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145069347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of major depressive disorder. 治疗药物监测在重度抑郁症治疗中的应用。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001046
Georgios Schoretsanitis, Michael Paulzen

Purpose of the narrative review: Response and remission rates in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with antidepressants are frequently not satisfying. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i.e. the quantification of antidepressant drug levels in blood and dose adjustment, is a modern and useful tool of personalized pharmacological treatment of MDD.

Recent findings: Emerging evidence suggests that the use of TDM for antidepressants can be helpful in numerous clinical scenarios. Such scenarios include lack of treatment response, relapse, or adverse drug reactions related to antidepressants. The use of TDM is also indicated in specific patient subgroups, such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients and patients with intellectual disabilities. Patients with polypharmacy and/or physical comorbidities may also benefit from TDM-guided antidepressant treatment. We critically reviewed TDM literature on antidepressants, summarizing therapeutic reference ranges and laboratory alert levels for antidepressants, although TDM is not equally recommended/supported for all antidepressants.

Summary: The utilization of TDM as a tool for treatment optimization in clinical routine with antidepressants for patients with MDD offers a valuable method to improve safety and effectiveness. This work summarizes essential TDM knowledge for antidepressants and encourages the application of TDM as part of the clinical decision-making process.

叙述性综述的目的:重度抑郁症(MDD)患者接受抗抑郁药治疗的反应和缓解率往往不令人满意。治疗性药物监测(TDM),即血液中抗抑郁药物水平和剂量调整的量化,是一种现代和有用的MDD个性化药物治疗工具。最新发现:新出现的证据表明,在许多临床情况下,使用TDM治疗抗抑郁药可能会有所帮助。这些情况包括缺乏治疗反应、复发或与抗抑郁药相关的药物不良反应。TDM也适用于特定的患者亚群,如儿童、青少年、孕妇、老年患者和智力残疾患者。患有多种药物和/或身体合并症的患者也可以从tdm指导的抗抑郁治疗中获益。尽管并非所有抗抑郁药都同样推荐/支持TDM,但我们严格审查了TDM有关抗抑郁药的文献,总结了抗抑郁药的治疗参考范围和实验室警戒水平。摘要:将TDM作为MDD患者临床常规抗抑郁药物治疗优化的工具,为提高MDD患者的安全性和有效性提供了一种有价值的方法。这项工作总结了抗抑郁药的基本TDM知识,并鼓励TDM作为临床决策过程的一部分应用。
{"title":"Utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of major depressive disorder.","authors":"Georgios Schoretsanitis, Michael Paulzen","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001046","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the narrative review: </strong>Response and remission rates in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with antidepressants are frequently not satisfying. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i.e. the quantification of antidepressant drug levels in blood and dose adjustment, is a modern and useful tool of personalized pharmacological treatment of MDD.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that the use of TDM for antidepressants can be helpful in numerous clinical scenarios. Such scenarios include lack of treatment response, relapse, or adverse drug reactions related to antidepressants. The use of TDM is also indicated in specific patient subgroups, such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients and patients with intellectual disabilities. Patients with polypharmacy and/or physical comorbidities may also benefit from TDM-guided antidepressant treatment. We critically reviewed TDM literature on antidepressants, summarizing therapeutic reference ranges and laboratory alert levels for antidepressants, although TDM is not equally recommended/supported for all antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The utilization of TDM as a tool for treatment optimization in clinical routine with antidepressants for patients with MDD offers a valuable method to improve safety and effectiveness. This work summarizes essential TDM knowledge for antidepressants and encourages the application of TDM as part of the clinical decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12672037/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From categories to traits: assessing personality dysfunction in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. 从类别到特征:评估ICD-11中的人格功能障碍和DSM-5中的人格障碍替代模型。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001040
Robert F Bornstein

Purpose of review: A paradigm shift in the assessment of personality pathology is underway, as diagnosticians move beyond traditional personality disorder categories and assess personality dysfunction using contemporary dimensional frameworks. This article describes the assessment of personality pathology in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD).

Recent findings: Recent findings in this area can be grouped into three domains: reliability, factor structure, and temporal stability of ICD-11 and AMPD constructs, convergence of personality pathology ratings with external indices of psychopathology and adjustment, and clinical utility (e.g., usefulness in rendering clinical decisions, prediction of treatment outcome).

Summary: Research in this area confirms that level of personality functioning and the presence of one or more pathological personality traits predict an array of clinical outcomes, including symptom disorders (e.g., anxiety, depression), suicide risk, and psychotherapy effectiveness. Findings support the cross-cultural generalizability of these patterns, and the clinical utility of assessing personality functioning and traits in adolescents and adults.

回顾目的:人格病理学评估的范式转变正在进行中,因为诊断医生超越了传统的人格障碍类别,并使用当代维度框架评估人格功能障碍。本文描述了ICD-11和DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中人格病理的评估。最新发现:该领域的最新发现可分为三个领域:ICD-11和AMPD结构的可靠性、因素结构和时间稳定性,人格病理评分与精神病理和适应的外部指标的趋同,以及临床实用性(例如,在临床决策、治疗结果预测方面的有用性)。摘要:该领域的研究证实,人格功能水平和一种或多种病态人格特征的存在可以预测一系列临床结果,包括症状障碍(如焦虑、抑郁)、自杀风险和心理治疗效果。研究结果支持这些模式的跨文化普遍性,以及评估青少年和成人人格功能和特征的临床应用。
{"title":"From categories to traits: assessing personality dysfunction in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.","authors":"Robert F Bornstein","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001040","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>A paradigm shift in the assessment of personality pathology is underway, as diagnosticians move beyond traditional personality disorder categories and assess personality dysfunction using contemporary dimensional frameworks. This article describes the assessment of personality pathology in ICD-11 and the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent findings in this area can be grouped into three domains: reliability, factor structure, and temporal stability of ICD-11 and AMPD constructs, convergence of personality pathology ratings with external indices of psychopathology and adjustment, and clinical utility (e.g., usefulness in rendering clinical decisions, prediction of treatment outcome).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Research in this area confirms that level of personality functioning and the presence of one or more pathological personality traits predict an array of clinical outcomes, including symptom disorders (e.g., anxiety, depression), suicide risk, and psychotherapy effectiveness. Findings support the cross-cultural generalizability of these patterns, and the clinical utility of assessing personality functioning and traits in adolescents and adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145069323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The characteristics of modern-type depression and its relevance in clinical practice. 现代型抑郁症的特点及其与临床的关系。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001050
Umberto Volpe, Laura Orsolini, Takahiro Kato

Purpose of review: Modern-type depression (MTD) has emerged as a distinct psychopathological construct in the context of 21st-century societal, technological, and cultural transformations in Japan. First described by Tarumi and then refined by Kato et al. , it has since been recognized internationally. MTD diverges from classical melancholic depression in aetiology, phenomenology, and therapeutic response.

Recent findings: It is especially prevalent among adolescents and young adults exposed to accelerated social rhythms, digital hyperconnectivity, and precarious work and relational structures. Clinically, MTD is characterized by avoidance of social roles, heightened sensitivity to interpersonal conflict, externalized complaints, emotional withdrawal, and tension between authentic and idealized selves. Unlike traditional depression, pharmacological treatments often yield limited benefit or worsen symptoms, underscoring the need for psychosocial and community-based interventions. Promising approaches include interpersonal counselling, psychoeducation, stress management, cognitive-behavioural therapy, physical activity, and neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation.

Summary: The advent of MTD highlights how socio-cultural acceleration and technological mediation shape mental health, exposing the limitations of conventional diagnostic frameworks. It also provides a valuable opportunity to investigate how social change influences psychopathology and to design culturally sensitive, developmentally informed strategies for prevention and treatment in younger populations.

回顾目的:现代型抑郁症(MTD)在21世纪日本社会、技术和文化转型的背景下作为一种独特的精神病理结构出现。它首先由Tarumi描述,然后由Kato等人改进,此后得到了国际认可。MTD在病因学、现象学和治疗反应上与传统的忧郁症有很大的不同。最近的研究发现:这在青少年和年轻人中尤其普遍,他们面临着加速的社会节奏、数字超连接、不稳定的工作和关系结构。临床表现为回避社会角色、对人际冲突高度敏感、外化抱怨、情绪退缩、真实自我与理想化自我之间的紧张关系。与传统的抑郁症不同,药物治疗往往效果有限或使症状恶化,因此需要社会心理和社区干预。有前景的方法包括人际咨询、心理教育、压力管理、认知行为疗法、身体活动和神经调节技术,如经颅直流电刺激。摘要:MTD的出现突出了社会文化加速和技术调解如何塑造心理健康,暴露了传统诊断框架的局限性。它还提供了一个宝贵的机会来调查社会变化如何影响精神病理学,并为年轻人群的预防和治疗设计具有文化敏感性和发展知情的战略。
{"title":"The characteristics of modern-type depression and its relevance in clinical practice.","authors":"Umberto Volpe, Laura Orsolini, Takahiro Kato","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001050","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Modern-type depression (MTD) has emerged as a distinct psychopathological construct in the context of 21st-century societal, technological, and cultural transformations in Japan. First described by Tarumi and then refined by Kato et al. , it has since been recognized internationally. MTD diverges from classical melancholic depression in aetiology, phenomenology, and therapeutic response.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>It is especially prevalent among adolescents and young adults exposed to accelerated social rhythms, digital hyperconnectivity, and precarious work and relational structures. Clinically, MTD is characterized by avoidance of social roles, heightened sensitivity to interpersonal conflict, externalized complaints, emotional withdrawal, and tension between authentic and idealized selves. Unlike traditional depression, pharmacological treatments often yield limited benefit or worsen symptoms, underscoring the need for psychosocial and community-based interventions. Promising approaches include interpersonal counselling, psychoeducation, stress management, cognitive-behavioural therapy, physical activity, and neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The advent of MTD highlights how socio-cultural acceleration and technological mediation shape mental health, exposing the limitations of conventional diagnostic frameworks. It also provides a valuable opportunity to investigate how social change influences psychopathology and to design culturally sensitive, developmentally informed strategies for prevention and treatment in younger populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complex posttraumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder: a truly complex relationship or a diagnostic artefact? 复杂创伤后应激障碍和边缘型人格障碍:真正复杂的关系还是诊断性的人工产物?
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001045
Alessandra D'Agostino, Marta Moselli, Vladan Starcevic

Purpose of review: This review examines the relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) in light of recent claims that the former might be replaced by the latter.

Recent findings: The stigma associated with BPD is not a convincing reason to suggest that CPTSD is more adequate than BPD, despite the fact that there is currently less stigma attached to it. BPD and CPTSD share some core symptoms, such as affective dysregulation and interpersonal difficulties. However, several features, including impulsivity, identity disturbance, and fear of abandonment, are relatively specific for BPD and may distinguish it from CPTSD. While trauma is a major risk factor for both conditions, it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the development of BPD because it can occur in the absence of trauma. In contrast, trauma is indispensable in the development of CPTSD. Research using latent class analysis and structural equation modeling has produced mixed results, with most studies identifying overlapping symptom clusters of BPD and CPTSD and suggesting that the boundaries between the two conditions are not clear.

Summary: While there are many similarities between BPD and CPTSD, they can be distinguished clinically, although the boundaries between them are not clear-cut. Current evidence strongly suggests that BPD cannot be reduced to a trauma-related condition and that it would therefore be erroneous to replace it with CPTSD.

综述目的:本综述探讨了边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)之间的关系,鉴于最近声称前者可能被后者所取代。最近的研究发现:与BPD相关的耻辱感并不是一个令人信服的理由,表明CPTSD比BPD更充分,尽管事实上目前它的耻辱感较少。BPD和CPTSD有一些共同的核心症状,如情感失调和人际关系困难。然而,一些特征,包括冲动、身份障碍和害怕被抛弃,是BPD相对特定的特征,可以将其与CPTSD区分开来。虽然创伤是这两种情况的主要危险因素,但它对于BPD的发展既不是必要的也不是充分的,因为它可以在没有创伤的情况下发生。相反,创伤在CPTSD的发展中是不可或缺的。使用潜在分类分析和结构方程模型的研究产生了不同的结果,大多数研究发现BPD和CPTSD的症状集群重叠,并表明这两种疾病之间的界限并不明确。总结:虽然BPD和CPTSD有许多相似之处,但它们在临床上是可以区分的,尽管它们之间的界限并不明确。目前的证据强烈表明,BPD不能被简化为创伤相关疾病,因此用CPTSD来代替它是错误的。
{"title":"Complex posttraumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder: a truly complex relationship or a diagnostic artefact?","authors":"Alessandra D'Agostino, Marta Moselli, Vladan Starcevic","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001045","DOIUrl":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines the relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) in light of recent claims that the former might be replaced by the latter.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The stigma associated with BPD is not a convincing reason to suggest that CPTSD is more adequate than BPD, despite the fact that there is currently less stigma attached to it. BPD and CPTSD share some core symptoms, such as affective dysregulation and interpersonal difficulties. However, several features, including impulsivity, identity disturbance, and fear of abandonment, are relatively specific for BPD and may distinguish it from CPTSD. While trauma is a major risk factor for both conditions, it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the development of BPD because it can occur in the absence of trauma. In contrast, trauma is indispensable in the development of CPTSD. Research using latent class analysis and structural equation modeling has produced mixed results, with most studies identifying overlapping symptom clusters of BPD and CPTSD and suggesting that the boundaries between the two conditions are not clear.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While there are many similarities between BPD and CPTSD, they can be distinguished clinically, although the boundaries between them are not clear-cut. Current evidence strongly suggests that BPD cannot be reduced to a trauma-related condition and that it would therefore be erroneous to replace it with CPTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"47-51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1