Negative mood and optimism bias: An experimental investigation of sadness and belief updating

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101910
Aleksandr T. Karnick , Brian W. Bauer , Daniel W. Capron
{"title":"Negative mood and optimism bias: An experimental investigation of sadness and belief updating","authors":"Aleksandr T. Karnick ,&nbsp;Brian W. Bauer ,&nbsp;Daniel W. Capron","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Understanding how individuals integrate new information to form beliefs under changing emotional conditions is crucial to describing decision-making processes. Previous research suggests that although most people demonstrate bias toward optimistic appraisals of new information when updating beliefs, individuals with dysphoric psychiatric conditions<span> (e.g., major depression) do not demonstrate this same bias. Despite these findings, limited research has investigated the relationship between affective states and belief updating processes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We induced neutral and sad moods in participants and had them complete a belief-updating paradigm by estimating the likelihood of negative future events happening to them, viewing the actual likelihood, and then re-estimating their perceived likelihood.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed that individuals updated their beliefs more after receiving desirable information relative to undesirable information under neutral conditions. Further, we found that individuals did not demonstrate unrealistic optimism under negative affective conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>This study incorporated a population of university students under laboratory conditions and would benefit from replication and extension in clinical populations and naturalistic settings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings suggest that momentary fluctuations in mood affect how individuals integrate information to form beliefs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Understanding how individuals integrate new information to form beliefs under changing emotional conditions is crucial to describing decision-making processes. Previous research suggests that although most people demonstrate bias toward optimistic appraisals of new information when updating beliefs, individuals with dysphoric psychiatric conditions (e.g., major depression) do not demonstrate this same bias. Despite these findings, limited research has investigated the relationship between affective states and belief updating processes.

Methods

We induced neutral and sad moods in participants and had them complete a belief-updating paradigm by estimating the likelihood of negative future events happening to them, viewing the actual likelihood, and then re-estimating their perceived likelihood.

Results

We observed that individuals updated their beliefs more after receiving desirable information relative to undesirable information under neutral conditions. Further, we found that individuals did not demonstrate unrealistic optimism under negative affective conditions.

Limitations

This study incorporated a population of university students under laboratory conditions and would benefit from replication and extension in clinical populations and naturalistic settings.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that momentary fluctuations in mood affect how individuals integrate information to form beliefs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消极情绪与乐观偏见:悲伤与信念更新的实验研究
背景和目的了解个体如何在不断变化的情绪条件下整合新信息形成信念,对于描述决策过程至关重要。先前的研究表明,尽管大多数人在更新信念时表现出对新信息的乐观评价的偏见,但患有躁郁症的人(例如,重度抑郁症)并没有表现出同样的偏见。尽管有这些发现,但关于情感状态与信念更新过程之间关系的研究有限。方法在被试中诱导中性和悲伤情绪,通过预估未来发生负面事件的可能性、观察实际可能性、再预估感知可能性来完成信念更新范式。结果我们观察到,在中性条件下,个体在收到满意信息后比收到不满意信息后更容易更新信念。此外,我们发现个体在消极情感条件下没有表现出不切实际的乐观主义。本研究纳入了实验室条件下的大学生群体,并将受益于在临床人群和自然环境中的复制和扩展。这些发现表明,情绪的短暂波动会影响个体整合信息形成信念的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
期刊最新文献
The effect of feedback in attention training on Attention Bias to Threat in individuals with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Examining the causal effects of social exclusion on shame and dissociative detachment Editorial Board Neurophysiological effects of cognitive behavioral therapy in social anxiety: An ERP study using a dot-probe task A multilevel examination of an inhibitory retrieval approach to exposure: Differentiating the unique and combined effects of multiple-context and multiple-stimulus cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1