Comparison of the Effects of Bathing and the Dry Technique on the Skin Condition of Early Neonates: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Annals of Dermatology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5021/ad.22.098
Sachi Higuchi, Seiichi Yoshida, Takeo Minematsu, Yutaka Hatano, Akifumi Notsu, Takamichi Ichinose
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Bathing and the Dry Technique on the Skin Condition of Early Neonates: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Sachi Higuchi,&nbsp;Seiichi Yoshida,&nbsp;Takeo Minematsu,&nbsp;Yutaka Hatano,&nbsp;Akifumi Notsu,&nbsp;Takamichi Ichinose","doi":"10.5021/ad.22.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, neonates have typically been bathed in a bathtub immediately after birth because bathing is a custom for cleansing impurities. However, dry technique has been introduced into many institutions since 2000. There is little scientific evidence on the benefit or harmfulness of either method to neonatal skin, and consequently, opinion remains split on which method is superior.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to determine whether bathing or the dry technique of cleaning is better in maintaining skin health in the early neonatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin pH, considered an index of skin barrier function, were measured in each group. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6, which are inflammatory cytokines released by keratinocytes, were measured by skin blotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEWL and skin pH of neonates were lower with the dry technique than with bathing. The expression level of IL-6 and TNF-α in chest skin of neonates was higher with bathing than with the dry technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the dry technique may maintain skin health better than bathing in the early neonatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":8233,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dermatology","volume":"35 4","pages":"256-265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/60/ad-35-256.PMC10407340.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.22.098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Japan, neonates have typically been bathed in a bathtub immediately after birth because bathing is a custom for cleansing impurities. However, dry technique has been introduced into many institutions since 2000. There is little scientific evidence on the benefit or harmfulness of either method to neonatal skin, and consequently, opinion remains split on which method is superior.

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether bathing or the dry technique of cleaning is better in maintaining skin health in the early neonatal period.

Methods: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin pH, considered an index of skin barrier function, were measured in each group. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6, which are inflammatory cytokines released by keratinocytes, were measured by skin blotting.

Results: TEWL and skin pH of neonates were lower with the dry technique than with bathing. The expression level of IL-6 and TNF-α in chest skin of neonates was higher with bathing than with the dry technique.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the dry technique may maintain skin health better than bathing in the early neonatal period.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沐浴法与干法对早期新生儿皮肤状况影响的前瞻性观察研究。
背景:在日本,新生儿通常在出生后立即在浴缸里洗澡,因为洗澡是清洁杂质的习俗。然而,自2000年以来,干式技术已被引入许多机构。关于这两种方法对新生儿皮肤的有益或有害的科学证据很少,因此,关于哪种方法更好的意见仍然存在分歧。目的:本研究的目的是确定沐浴或干式清洁技术在维持新生儿早期皮肤健康方面是否更好。方法:测定各组经皮失水(TEWL)和皮肤pH值,作为皮肤屏障功能的指标。肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)- α和白细胞介素(IL)-6是角质形成细胞释放的炎症细胞因子,采用皮肤印迹法测定。结果:干法新生儿TEWL和皮肤pH值低于沐浴法。洗浴组新生儿胸部皮肤IL-6、TNF-α表达水平高于干法组。结论:在新生儿早期,干燥法比沐浴法能更好地保持皮肤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dermatology
Annals of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Dermatology (Ann Dermatol) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Korean Dermatological Association and the Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology. Since 1989, Ann Dermatol has contributed as a platform for communicating the latest research outcome and recent trend of dermatology in Korea and all over the world. Ann Dermatol seeks for ameliorated understanding of skin and skin-related disease for clinicians and researchers. Ann Dermatol deals with diverse skin-related topics from laboratory investigations to clinical outcomes and invites review articles, original articles, case reports, brief reports and items of correspondence. Ann Dermatol is interested in contributions from all countries in which good and advanced research is carried out. Ann Dermatol willingly recruits well-organized and significant manuscripts with proper scope throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Risk of Developing Hypertension in Atopic Dermatitis Patients Receiving Long-term and Low-dose Cyclosporine: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study. Skin Barrier Function Assessment: Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Is Less Influenced by Daily Routine Activities Than Transepidermal Water Loss. Factors Associated With Achieving Complete Skin Clearance Compared to Almost Complete Skin Clearance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treated With Biologics: A Retrospective Chart Review. Facial Dermatoses Associated With Mask-Wearing in the COVID-19 Era: A Nationwide, Cross-Sectional, Multicenter, Questionnaire-based Study. A Comprehensive Review of the Acne Grading Scale in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1