Detection of anti-androgenic activity of chemicals in fish studies: a data review.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398
{"title":"Detection of anti-androgenic activity of chemicals in fish studies: a data review.","authors":"Grace H Panter,&nbsp;Rebecca J Brown,&nbsp;Alan Jones,&nbsp;Oliver Körner,&nbsp;Laurent Lagadic,&nbsp;Lennart Weltje","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on <i>in vitro</i> anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from <i>in vivo</i> studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin <i>in vitro</i> assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"53 5","pages":"326-338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2232398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted on the sensitivity of fish testing guidelines to detect the anti-androgenic activity of substances. Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) was used to investigate the conservation of the androgen receptor (AR) between humans and fish, and among fish species recommended in test guidelines. The AR is conserved between fish species and humans (i.e. ligand binding domain [LBD] homology ≥70%) and among the recommended fish species (LBD homology >85%). For model anti-androgens, we evaluated literature data on in vitro anti-androgenic activity in fish-specific receptor-based assays and changes in endpoints indicative of endocrine modulation from in vivo studies. Anti-androgenic activity was most consistently and reliably detected in in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies with co-exposure to an androgen (spiggin in vitro assay, Rapid Androgen Disruption Activity Reporter [RADAR] Assay, and Androgenised Female Stickleback Screen). Regardless of study design (Fish Short-Term Reproduction Assay [FSTRA], Fish Sexual Development Test [FSDT], partial or full life-cycle tests), or endpoint (vitellogenin, secondary sexual characteristics, gonadal histopathology, sex ratio), there was no consistent evidence for detecting anti-androgenic activity in studies without androgen co-exposure, even for the most potent substances (while less potent substances may induce no (clear) response). Therefore, based on studies without androgen co-exposure (35 FSTRAs and 22 other studies), the other studies (including the FSDT) do not outperform the FSTRA for detecting potent anti-androgenic activity, which if suspected, would be best addressed with a RADAR assay. Overall, fish do not appear particularly sensitive to mammalian anti-androgens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鱼类研究中化学物质抗雄激素活性的检测:数据综述。
对检测物质抗雄激素活性的鱼类检测指南的敏感性进行了系统评价。利用序列比对预测跨物种敏感性(SeqAPASS)研究了人类和鱼类之间以及测试指南中推荐的鱼类之间雄激素受体(AR)的保守性。该AR在鱼类和人类之间(即配体结合域[LBD]同源性≥70%)和推荐鱼类之间(LBD同源性>85%)具有保守性。对于模型抗雄激素,我们评估了基于鱼类特异性受体的体外抗雄激素活性的文献数据,以及体内研究中指示内分泌调节的终点变化。抗雄激素活性在体外和体内机制研究中最一致和可靠地检测到,同时暴露于雄激素(spiggin体外试验、快速雄激素干扰活性报告[RADAR]试验和雄激素化雌性棘鱼筛查)。无论研究设计(鱼类短期繁殖试验[FSTRA]、鱼类性发育试验[FSDT]、部分或全部生命周期试验)或终点(卵黄原蛋白、第二性征、性腺组织病理学、性别比例)如何,在没有雄激素共同暴露的研究中,没有一致的证据可以检测到抗雄激素活性,即使是最有效的物质(而效力较弱的物质可能不会引起(明确的)反应)。因此,基于没有雄激素共暴露的研究(35个FSTRA和22个其他研究),其他研究(包括FSDT)在检测有效的抗雄激素活性方面并不优于FSTRA,如果怀疑,最好通过RADAR检测来解决。总的来说,鱼类似乎对哺乳动物的抗雄激素并不特别敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Development of a high-performance reporter plasmid for detection of chemicals with androgenic activity
IF 6.1 2区 医学Archives of ToxicologyPub Date : 2003-02-20 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-003-0437-z
Masahiro Takeyoshi, Naoko Kuga, Kanji Yamasaki
The anti-androgenic activity of a phenanthrene derivative in the chick.
IF 4.8 3区 医学EndocrinologyPub Date : 1959-03-01 DOI: 10.1210/endo-64-3-464
R I DORFMAN
The Cloacal Test: a Method for Testing Anti-androgenic Effects of Chemicals in Birds
IF 1.5 4区 农林科学Journal of Poultry SciencePub Date : 2004-01-25 DOI: 10.2141/JPSA.41.58
J. Liang, R. Otsuka, M. Wada, Y. Yoshimura
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of rodent carcinogenicity studies on butyl methacrylate demonstrates a lack of carcinogenic potential. Mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity mediated by perturbed thyroid hormone homeostasis in the brain: an adverse outcome pathway network. Perspectives on aerosol inhalability: concepts and applications. A risk assessment of mechanics who changed chrysotile asbestos containing brakes and other vehicle components in the 1950s-early 2000s era: an update on the 2004 evaluation. A quantitative weight-of-evidence review of preclinical studies examining the potential developmental and reproductive toxicity of acetaminophen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1