Queering the Social Imaginaries of the Dead.

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Australian Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI:10.1080/08164649.2020.1791690
Margrit Shildrick
{"title":"Queering the Social Imaginaries of the Dead.","authors":"Margrit Shildrick","doi":"10.1080/08164649.2020.1791690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>I offer a philosophical examination and feminist queering of the social imaginaries of the dead - with specific reference to recent public disclosures about death in Ireland's Mother and Baby Homes - by looking at the issue of spectrality through the work of Jacques Derrida and others. What does it mean to respond to the dead, who, though temporarily forgotten, return to haunt us not as remembered human beings but as remnants or remainders? The normative distinctions between past and present; past, present and future; between living and non-living; absence and presence; and self and other are all made indistinct when displaced by a non-linear temporality. What differential is in play with respect to those who are grievable (in Judith Butler's terms) and the others who constitute what Giorgio Agamben calls bare life? The strategy of memorialising the re/discovered dead seems inadequate, and I outline an alternative hauntological ethics, as suggested by Derrida, and ask if there are queer social imaginaries that allow us to live well with the dead not because we give respect, but because death itself has been rethought. I close with some speculations arising from Deleuzian vitalism and Rosi Braidotti's optimistic claim that 'death frees us into life'.</p>","PeriodicalId":46443,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Studies","volume":"35 104","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08164649.2020.1791690","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2020.1791690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

I offer a philosophical examination and feminist queering of the social imaginaries of the dead - with specific reference to recent public disclosures about death in Ireland's Mother and Baby Homes - by looking at the issue of spectrality through the work of Jacques Derrida and others. What does it mean to respond to the dead, who, though temporarily forgotten, return to haunt us not as remembered human beings but as remnants or remainders? The normative distinctions between past and present; past, present and future; between living and non-living; absence and presence; and self and other are all made indistinct when displaced by a non-linear temporality. What differential is in play with respect to those who are grievable (in Judith Butler's terms) and the others who constitute what Giorgio Agamben calls bare life? The strategy of memorialising the re/discovered dead seems inadequate, and I outline an alternative hauntological ethics, as suggested by Derrida, and ask if there are queer social imaginaries that allow us to live well with the dead not because we give respect, but because death itself has been rethought. I close with some speculations arising from Deleuzian vitalism and Rosi Braidotti's optimistic claim that 'death frees us into life'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颠覆对死者的社会想象。
我通过雅克·德里达和其他人的作品,对幽灵性问题进行了审视,并对社会对死者的想象进行了哲学考察和女权主义的好奇——具体参照最近公开披露的爱尔兰母婴之家的死亡情况。对死者作出回应意味着什么?死者虽然暂时被人遗忘,但他们不是作为被人记住的人,而是作为遗留物或遗留物回来困扰我们。过去和现在的规范性区别;过去、现在和未来;在生物和非生物之间;缺席和在场;当自我和他者被非线性的时间性所取代时,它们都变得模糊不清。对于那些可悲的人(用朱迪思·巴特勒的话来说)和那些构成了乔治·阿甘本所说的赤裸生活的人来说,有什么区别呢?纪念被发现的死者的策略似乎是不够的,我概述了另一种鬼魂学伦理,正如德里达所建议的那样,并问是否有奇怪的社会想象,让我们与死者生活得很好,不是因为我们给予尊重,而是因为死亡本身已经被重新思考。最后,我以德勒兹生机论和罗西·布雷多蒂(Rosi Braidotti)乐观的观点——“死亡让我们自由地进入生命”——提出的一些推测作为结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Feminist Studies
Australian Feminist Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Australian Feminist Studies was launched in the summer of 1985 by the Research Centre for Women"s Studies at the University of Adelaide. During the subsequent two decades it has become a leading journal of feminist studies. As an international, peer-reviewed journal, Australian Feminist Studies is proud to sustain a clear political commitment to feminist teaching, research and scholarship. The journal publishes articles of the highest calibre from all around the world, that contribute to current developments and issues across a spectrum of feminisms.
期刊最新文献
Everything is Patchwork! A Conversation about Methodological Experimentation with Patchwork Ethnography. Doing Film Feminisms in the Age of Popular Feminism: A Roundtable Convened by Claire Perkins and Jodi Brooks Radioactive Spacetimes and the Quantum Cosmologies of Kathy Jetn̄il-Kijiner The History and Impact of Women in the Parliament of Western Australia: From Golden Age to Disappointment Sharing the Wealth: Tax, Justice, Gender and Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1