Consuming Health Information and Vulnerable Populations: Factors of Engagement and Ongoing Usage.

Pascal Staccini, Annie Y S Lau
{"title":"Consuming Health Information and Vulnerable Populations: Factors of Engagement and Ongoing Usage.","authors":"Pascal Staccini,&nbsp;Annie Y S Lau","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarise the state of the art during the year 2021 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on \"Inclusive Digital Health: Addressing Equity, Literacy, and Bias for Resilient Health Systems\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries. In order to build queries, we have used a common understanding of digital inclusion. Leaving no one behind in the digital age requires not only reaching the most vulnerable populations, but also those people and population groups that are not digitally literate. It implies appropriate access, digital skills, and usability and navigability aspects in the development of technological solutions. Thus, we identified 126 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 13 were selected for consideration of best paper candidates, which were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. The top five papers were discussed in a consensus meeting. Four papers received the highest score from the expert panel, and these papers were selected to be representative papers on consumer informatics for exploring inclusive digital health in the year 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bibliometrics analysis conducted on words found in abstracts of the candidate papers revealed five clusters of articles, where the clustering outcomes explained 93.58% of the dispersion. The first cluster analysed the use of mobile apps to improve quality of communications between racial subgroups (e.g., Black patients and their family members) and healthcare professionals, and reduce racial disparities in core palliative care outcomes. The second cluster revealed studies reporting health literacy and experience of patients with specific diseases or impairments (e.g., type 2 diabetes, asthma and deaf people). The third focused assessing the effectiveness of interactive social media interventions on changing health behaviors, health outcomes and health equity in the adult population. The fourth targeted people with limited health literacy, as well as potentially disadvantaged or marginalized groups (people with cerebrovascular or cancer problems, students with mental problems, African American Young adults), and explored how social media may help reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes. The last explored health literacy levels among groups who experience difficulties with health service engagement and retention (patients with cancer or lay consumers of online disease information).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the query was built to address consumer inclusiveness and digital health, without specifying any health status or disease, COVID-19 was the topic in a lot of retrieved papers. Beyond the classic health issues targeted by social media (e.g., influencing health behaviors, from smoking and diet adherence to preventative screening and exercise habits), the pandemic has exposed many situations of vulnerability and health inequality. There is universal agreement on the necessity of a healthcare policy that addresses issues of gender, age, sexual orientation, and different cultures to ensure health equity for all, regardless of age or resources available. The place of digital health is studied both as a solution and a possible factor of accentuating healthcare disparities, inequalities, and exclusions. Healthcare providers should implement a digital health literacy plan to make sure health information technology is an option for everyone. Public health policies and health promotion strategies must focus on strengthening and adapting the digital health literacy in known vulnerable subgroups (ethnic and racial minorities, sexual and gender minorities, children and adolescents, elderly people, students population, impaired people, patients with cancer and chronic diseases) increasing citizen technology engagement and guaranteeing equity in access to information and in the skills to manage, discriminate, and apply information to health.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/25/10-1055-s-0042-1742549.PMC9719752.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: To summarise the state of the art during the year 2021 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on "Inclusive Digital Health: Addressing Equity, Literacy, and Bias for Resilient Health Systems".

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries. In order to build queries, we have used a common understanding of digital inclusion. Leaving no one behind in the digital age requires not only reaching the most vulnerable populations, but also those people and population groups that are not digitally literate. It implies appropriate access, digital skills, and usability and navigability aspects in the development of technological solutions. Thus, we identified 126 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 13 were selected for consideration of best paper candidates, which were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. The top five papers were discussed in a consensus meeting. Four papers received the highest score from the expert panel, and these papers were selected to be representative papers on consumer informatics for exploring inclusive digital health in the year 2021.

Results: Bibliometrics analysis conducted on words found in abstracts of the candidate papers revealed five clusters of articles, where the clustering outcomes explained 93.58% of the dispersion. The first cluster analysed the use of mobile apps to improve quality of communications between racial subgroups (e.g., Black patients and their family members) and healthcare professionals, and reduce racial disparities in core palliative care outcomes. The second cluster revealed studies reporting health literacy and experience of patients with specific diseases or impairments (e.g., type 2 diabetes, asthma and deaf people). The third focused assessing the effectiveness of interactive social media interventions on changing health behaviors, health outcomes and health equity in the adult population. The fourth targeted people with limited health literacy, as well as potentially disadvantaged or marginalized groups (people with cerebrovascular or cancer problems, students with mental problems, African American Young adults), and explored how social media may help reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes. The last explored health literacy levels among groups who experience difficulties with health service engagement and retention (patients with cancer or lay consumers of online disease information).

Conclusions: Although the query was built to address consumer inclusiveness and digital health, without specifying any health status or disease, COVID-19 was the topic in a lot of retrieved papers. Beyond the classic health issues targeted by social media (e.g., influencing health behaviors, from smoking and diet adherence to preventative screening and exercise habits), the pandemic has exposed many situations of vulnerability and health inequality. There is universal agreement on the necessity of a healthcare policy that addresses issues of gender, age, sexual orientation, and different cultures to ensure health equity for all, regardless of age or resources available. The place of digital health is studied both as a solution and a possible factor of accentuating healthcare disparities, inequalities, and exclusions. Healthcare providers should implement a digital health literacy plan to make sure health information technology is an option for everyone. Public health policies and health promotion strategies must focus on strengthening and adapting the digital health literacy in known vulnerable subgroups (ethnic and racial minorities, sexual and gender minorities, children and adolescents, elderly people, students population, impaired people, patients with cancer and chronic diseases) increasing citizen technology engagement and guaranteeing equity in access to information and in the skills to manage, discriminate, and apply information to health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费健康信息和弱势群体:参与和持续使用的因素。
目标:总结2021年消费者健康信息和教育的最新进展,特别强调“包容性数字健康:解决弹性卫生系统的公平、扫盲和偏见”。方法:我们使用预定义的查询集对PubMed上发表的文章进行系统搜索。为了构建查询,我们使用了对数字包容的共同理解。在数字时代不让任何一个人掉队,不仅需要接触到最脆弱的人群,还需要接触到那些不懂数字的人和群体。这意味着在技术解决方案的开发中需要适当的访问、数字技能以及可用性和可导航性方面。因此,我们确定了126篇潜在的综述文章。这些文章根据主题相关性进行筛选,并选出13篇作为最佳论文候选人,然后提交给国际专家小组进行完整的论文审查和评分。排名前五的论文在一次共识会议上进行了讨论。四篇论文获得了专家组的最高分,这些论文被选为2021年探索包容性数字健康的消费者信息学代表论文。结果:对候选论文摘要中的词汇进行文献计量学分析,发现了5个聚类,聚类结果解释了93.58%的离散度。第一个聚类分析了移动应用程序的使用,以提高种族亚群体(例如,黑人患者及其家庭成员)与医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通质量,并减少核心姑息治疗结果的种族差异。第二组展示了报告特定疾病或损伤患者(如2型糖尿病、哮喘和聋哑人)健康素养和经验的研究。第三项研究的重点是评估互动式社会媒体干预措施在改变成人健康行为、健康结果和健康公平方面的有效性。第四项研究的目标是卫生知识有限的人,以及潜在的弱势群体或边缘化群体(患有脑血管或癌症的人、有精神问题的学生、非裔美国年轻人),并探讨了社交媒体如何有助于缩小健康差距和改善健康结果。最后一项研究探讨了在参与和保留卫生服务方面遇到困难的群体(癌症患者或在线疾病信息的非专业消费者)的卫生素养水平。结论:虽然该查询是为了解决消费者包容性和数字健康问题而构建的,没有指定任何健康状况或疾病,但COVID-19是许多检索到的论文的主题。除了社交媒体针对的经典健康问题(例如,影响健康行为,从吸烟和饮食坚持到预防性筛查和锻炼习惯)之外,大流行还暴露了许多脆弱性和健康不平等的情况。人们普遍认为,有必要制定一项解决性别、年龄、性取向和不同文化问题的卫生保健政策,以确保所有人,无论年龄或可用资源如何,都享有卫生平等。数字健康的地位既被研究为一种解决方案,也被研究为加剧医疗保健差距、不平等和排斥的可能因素。医疗保健提供者应实施数字健康素养计划,以确保每个人都可以选择卫生信息技术。公共卫生政策和健康促进战略必须侧重于加强和调整已知弱势亚群体(族裔和种族少数群体、性和性别少数群体、儿童和青少年、老年人、学生群体、残疾人、癌症和慢性病患者)的数字卫生素养,增加公民对技术的参与,并保障在获取信息和管理、歧视技能方面的公平;并将信息应用于健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reflections Towards the Future of Medical Informatics. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Health Disparities and the Digital Divide. Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability. The Need for Green and Responsible Medical Informatics and Digital Health: Looking Forward with One Digital Health. Health Equity in Clinical Research Informatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1