Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Mark S Humayun, Suber S Huang
{"title":"Gaps and future of human-centered artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Future Vision Forum consensus statement.","authors":"Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Mark S Humayun, Suber S Huang","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000000984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The Future Vision Forum discussed the current state of Human Centered Computing and the future of data collection, curation, and collation in ophthalmology. Although the uptake of electronic health record (EHR) systems and the digitization of healthcare data is encouraging, there are still barriers to implementing a specialty-wide clinical trial database. The article identifies several critical opportunities, including the need for standardization of image metadata and data, the establishment of a centralized trial database, incentives for clinicians and trial sponsors to participate, and resolving ethical concerns surrounding data ownership.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Recommendations to overcome these challenges include the standardization of image metadata using the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) guidelines, the establishment of a centralized trial database that uses federated learning (FL), and the use of FL to facilitate cross-institutional collaboration for rare diseases. Forum faculty suggests incentives will accelerate artificial intelligence, digital innovation projects, and data sharing agreements to empower patients to release their data.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A specialty-wide clinical trial database could provide invaluable insights into the natural history of disease, pathophysiology, why trials fail, and improve future clinical trial design. However, overcoming the barriers to implementation will require continued discussion, collaboration, and collective action from stakeholders across the ophthalmology community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The Future Vision Forum discussed the current state of Human Centered Computing and the future of data collection, curation, and collation in ophthalmology. Although the uptake of electronic health record (EHR) systems and the digitization of healthcare data is encouraging, there are still barriers to implementing a specialty-wide clinical trial database. The article identifies several critical opportunities, including the need for standardization of image metadata and data, the establishment of a centralized trial database, incentives for clinicians and trial sponsors to participate, and resolving ethical concerns surrounding data ownership.
Findings: Recommendations to overcome these challenges include the standardization of image metadata using the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) guidelines, the establishment of a centralized trial database that uses federated learning (FL), and the use of FL to facilitate cross-institutional collaboration for rare diseases. Forum faculty suggests incentives will accelerate artificial intelligence, digital innovation projects, and data sharing agreements to empower patients to release their data.
Summary: A specialty-wide clinical trial database could provide invaluable insights into the natural history of disease, pathophysiology, why trials fail, and improve future clinical trial design. However, overcoming the barriers to implementation will require continued discussion, collaboration, and collective action from stakeholders across the ophthalmology community.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.