Attitudes and Practices Surrounding Opioid Prescriptions following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: A Survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Membership.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2023-09-07 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/9968219
Jihad A Abouali, Evan D Curd, Xin Y Mei, Ujash Sheth, Moin Khan, Darren de Sa, Vehniah K Tjong, Jesleen Rana
{"title":"Attitudes and Practices Surrounding Opioid Prescriptions following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: A Survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Membership.","authors":"Jihad A Abouali, Evan D Curd, Xin Y Mei, Ujash Sheth, Moin Khan, Darren de Sa, Vehniah K Tjong, Jesleen Rana","doi":"10.1155/2023/9968219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The past two decades have seen a significant increase in consequences associated with nonmedical misuse of prescription opioids, such as addiction and unintentional overdose deaths. This study aimed to use an electronic survey to assess attitudes and opioid-prescribing practices of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons and trainees following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius and ankle fractures. This study was the first to assess these factors following ORIF of distal radius and ankle fractures using a survey design. Methods A 40-item survey was developed focusing on four themes: respondent demographics, opioid-prescribing practice, patients with substance use disorders, and drug diversion. The survey was distributed among members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondent demographics and outcomes of interest. A Chi-square test was used to determine if proportion of opioid prescriptions between attending surgeons and surgeons in training was equal. Results 191 surveys were completed. Most respondents prescribed 10–40 tabs of immediate-release opioids, though this number varied considerably. While most respondents believed patients consumed only 40–80% of the prescribed opioids (73.6%), only 28.7% of respondents counselled patients on safe storage/disposal of leftover opioids. 30.5% of respondents felt confident in their knowledge of opioid use and mechanisms of addiction. Most respondents desired further education on topics such as procedure-based opioid-prescribing protocols (74.2%), alternative pain management strategies (69.7%), and mechanisms of opioid addiction (49.0%). Conclusions The principle finding of this study is the lack of a standardized approach to postoperative prescribing in distal radius and ankle fractures, illustrated by the wide range in number of opioids prescribed by Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. Our data suggest a trend towards overprescription among respondents following distal radius and ankle ORIF. Future studies should aim to rationalize interventions targeted at reducing postoperative opioid prescribing for common orthopaedic trauma procedures.","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9968219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The past two decades have seen a significant increase in consequences associated with nonmedical misuse of prescription opioids, such as addiction and unintentional overdose deaths. This study aimed to use an electronic survey to assess attitudes and opioid-prescribing practices of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons and trainees following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius and ankle fractures. This study was the first to assess these factors following ORIF of distal radius and ankle fractures using a survey design. Methods A 40-item survey was developed focusing on four themes: respondent demographics, opioid-prescribing practice, patients with substance use disorders, and drug diversion. The survey was distributed among members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondent demographics and outcomes of interest. A Chi-square test was used to determine if proportion of opioid prescriptions between attending surgeons and surgeons in training was equal. Results 191 surveys were completed. Most respondents prescribed 10–40 tabs of immediate-release opioids, though this number varied considerably. While most respondents believed patients consumed only 40–80% of the prescribed opioids (73.6%), only 28.7% of respondents counselled patients on safe storage/disposal of leftover opioids. 30.5% of respondents felt confident in their knowledge of opioid use and mechanisms of addiction. Most respondents desired further education on topics such as procedure-based opioid-prescribing protocols (74.2%), alternative pain management strategies (69.7%), and mechanisms of opioid addiction (49.0%). Conclusions The principle finding of this study is the lack of a standardized approach to postoperative prescribing in distal radius and ankle fractures, illustrated by the wide range in number of opioids prescribed by Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. Our data suggest a trend towards overprescription among respondents following distal radius and ankle ORIF. Future studies should aim to rationalize interventions targeted at reducing postoperative opioid prescribing for common orthopaedic trauma procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡骨远端和踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术后阿片类药物处方的态度和实践:加拿大骨科协会会员调查。
背景:在过去的二十年里,非药物滥用处方阿片类药物的后果显著增加,如成瘾和非故意过量死亡。本研究旨在使用电子调查来评估加拿大整形外科医生和受训人员在桡骨远端和踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)后的态度和阿片类药物处方实践。本研究首次采用调查设计评估桡骨远端和踝关节骨折ORIF后的这些因素。方法:制定了一项40项调查,重点关注四个主题:受访者人口统计、阿片类药物处方实践、药物使用障碍患者和药物转移。该调查在加拿大骨科协会的成员中分发。描述性统计用于总结受访者的人口统计数据和感兴趣的结果。卡方检验用于确定主治外科医生和接受培训的外科医生之间阿片类药物处方的比例是否相等。结果:完成了191项调查。大多数受访者开了10-40片立即释放的阿片类药物,尽管这个数字差异很大。虽然大多数受访者认为患者只摄入了处方阿片类药物的40-80%(73.6%),但只有28.7%的受访者建议患者安全储存/处置剩余阿片类。30.5%的受访者对自己对阿片类药物的使用和成瘾机制的了解充满信心。大多数受访者希望进一步了解基于程序的阿片类药物处方方案(74.2%)、替代疼痛管理策略(69.7%)和阿片类成瘾机制(49.0%)等主题。结论:本研究的主要发现是缺乏桡骨远端和踝关节骨折术后处方的标准化方法,加拿大整形外科医生开出的阿片类药物种类繁多。我们的数据表明,桡骨远端和踝关节ORIF后,受试者有过度用药的趋势。未来的研究应旨在合理化干预措施,以减少常见骨科创伤手术的术后阿片类药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Efficacy of Local Corticosteroid Injection, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Pes Anserine Bursitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Reimagined MPFL Reconstruction: Retinacular Fixation of the Doubled Hamstring Graft at the Patella and Suture Anchor-Based Femoral Fixation. Performance of Orthopaedic Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons on a Biostatistical Knowledge Examination. Attitudes and Practices Surrounding Opioid Prescriptions following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: A Survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Membership. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation for Bone Healing in Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1