Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Packages of New Drug Applications Approved for the Treatment of Rare Diseases.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1002/jcph.2167
Hisham Qosa, Hazem E Hassan, Islam R Younis
{"title":"Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Packages of New Drug Applications Approved for the Treatment of Rare Diseases.","authors":"Hisham Qosa,&nbsp;Hazem E Hassan,&nbsp;Islam R Younis","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are more than 7000 rare diseases affecting approximately 30 million people in the United States. More than 90% of these diseases lack approved therapies. Several challenges face the development of \"orphan drugs\", such as the small populations of patients, high development costs, and long development timelines. This study evaluates clinical pharmacology assessments conducted during the development of drugs to treat rare diseases approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and 2021. Thirty-nine new drug applications (NDAs) have been identified and the associated regulatory reviews, approved labels, and approval letters were reviewed. Approximately, 95%, 74%, and 77% of these submissions contained at least one type of drug-drug interaction, the effect of organ impairment (hepatic and renal) on drug exposure, and QT liability assessment, respectively. Modeling and simulation approaches were utilized to address many clinical pharmacology questions, with population pharmacokinetic analyses used extensively in the evaluation of the effect of organ impairment on drug exposure and with physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses used mainly in assessing drug interaction risks. In general, the clinical pharmacology packages in the NDAs of orphan drugs are not optimal and more work is needed to obtain a complete clinical pharmacology package at the time of initial approval to ensure the safe and effective use of these drugs across the spectrum of the target patient population. This study provides insights into the clinical pharmacology studies needed for drugs to treat rare diseases and would help both the regulators and drug developers to identify challenges and opportunities in conducting clinical pharmacology assessments for drugs developed to treat rare diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.2167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There are more than 7000 rare diseases affecting approximately 30 million people in the United States. More than 90% of these diseases lack approved therapies. Several challenges face the development of "orphan drugs", such as the small populations of patients, high development costs, and long development timelines. This study evaluates clinical pharmacology assessments conducted during the development of drugs to treat rare diseases approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and 2021. Thirty-nine new drug applications (NDAs) have been identified and the associated regulatory reviews, approved labels, and approval letters were reviewed. Approximately, 95%, 74%, and 77% of these submissions contained at least one type of drug-drug interaction, the effect of organ impairment (hepatic and renal) on drug exposure, and QT liability assessment, respectively. Modeling and simulation approaches were utilized to address many clinical pharmacology questions, with population pharmacokinetic analyses used extensively in the evaluation of the effect of organ impairment on drug exposure and with physiologically based pharmacokinetic analyses used mainly in assessing drug interaction risks. In general, the clinical pharmacology packages in the NDAs of orphan drugs are not optimal and more work is needed to obtain a complete clinical pharmacology package at the time of initial approval to ensure the safe and effective use of these drugs across the spectrum of the target patient population. This study provides insights into the clinical pharmacology studies needed for drugs to treat rare diseases and would help both the regulators and drug developers to identify challenges and opportunities in conducting clinical pharmacology assessments for drugs developed to treat rare diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罕见病新药申请的临床药理学综述
在美国,有7000多种罕见疾病影响着大约3000万人。这些疾病中90%以上缺乏经批准的治疗方法。“孤儿药”的开发面临若干挑战,例如患者人数少、开发成本高和开发时间长。本研究评估了美国食品和药物管理局(fda)在2020年和2021年批准的罕见病治疗药物开发过程中进行的临床药理学评估。已经确定了39个新药申请(nda),并审查了相关的监管审查、已批准的标签和批准函。大约95%,74%和77%的提交分别包含至少一种类型的药物-药物相互作用,器官损害(肝脏和肾脏)对药物暴露的影响,以及QT负债评估。建模和模拟方法被用于解决许多临床药理学问题,人群药代动力学分析广泛用于评估器官损害对药物暴露的影响,而基于生理学的药代动力学分析主要用于评估药物相互作用风险。总的来说,孤儿药nda中的临床药理学包并不是最优的,在初始批准时获得完整的临床药理学包,以确保这些药物在整个目标患者群体中安全有效地使用,还需要做更多的工作。本研究为罕见病治疗药物的临床药理学研究提供了新的思路,有助于监管机构和药物开发人员识别罕见病治疗药物临床药理学评估的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1