Towards diagnostic excellence on academic ward teams: building a conceptual model of team dynamics in the diagnostic process.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnosis Pub Date : 2023-08-11 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2023-0065
Justin J Choi, Michael A Rosen, Martin F Shapiro, Monika M Safford
{"title":"Towards diagnostic excellence on academic ward teams: building a conceptual model of team dynamics in the diagnostic process.","authors":"Justin J Choi, Michael A Rosen, Martin F Shapiro, Monika M Safford","doi":"10.1515/dx-2023-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Achieving diagnostic excellence on medical wards requires teamwork and effective team dynamics. However, the study of ward team dynamics in teaching hospitals is relatively underdeveloped. We aim to enhance understanding of how ward team members interact in the diagnostic process and of the underlying behavioral, psychological, and cognitive mechanisms driving team interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mixed-methods to develop and refine a conceptual model of how ward team dynamics in an academic medical center influence the diagnostic process. First, we systematically searched existing literature for conceptual models and empirical studies of team dynamics. Then, we conducted field observations with thematic analysis to refine our model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present a conceptual model of how medical ward team dynamics influence the diagnostic process, which serves as a roadmap for future research and interventions in this area. We identified three underexplored areas of team dynamics that are relevant to diagnostic excellence and that merit future investigation (1): ward team structures (e.g., team roles, responsibilities) (2); contextual factors (e.g., time constraints, location of team members, culture, diversity); and (3) emergent states (shared mental models, psychological safety, team trust, and team emotions).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimizing the diagnostic process to achieve diagnostic excellence is likely to depend on addressing all of the potential barriers and facilitators to ward team dynamics presented in our model.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"363-374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Achieving diagnostic excellence on medical wards requires teamwork and effective team dynamics. However, the study of ward team dynamics in teaching hospitals is relatively underdeveloped. We aim to enhance understanding of how ward team members interact in the diagnostic process and of the underlying behavioral, psychological, and cognitive mechanisms driving team interactions.

Methods: We used mixed-methods to develop and refine a conceptual model of how ward team dynamics in an academic medical center influence the diagnostic process. First, we systematically searched existing literature for conceptual models and empirical studies of team dynamics. Then, we conducted field observations with thematic analysis to refine our model.

Results: We present a conceptual model of how medical ward team dynamics influence the diagnostic process, which serves as a roadmap for future research and interventions in this area. We identified three underexplored areas of team dynamics that are relevant to diagnostic excellence and that merit future investigation (1): ward team structures (e.g., team roles, responsibilities) (2); contextual factors (e.g., time constraints, location of team members, culture, diversity); and (3) emergent states (shared mental models, psychological safety, team trust, and team emotions).

Conclusions: Optimizing the diagnostic process to achieve diagnostic excellence is likely to depend on addressing all of the potential barriers and facilitators to ward team dynamics presented in our model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向学术病房团队的卓越诊断:建立诊断过程中团队动态的概念模型。
目标:在病房实现卓越诊断需要团队合作和有效的团队动力。然而,教学医院对病房团队动态的研究相对欠发达。我们的目标是加强对病房团队成员在诊断过程中如何互动以及驱动团队互动的潜在行为,心理和认知机制的理解。方法:我们使用混合方法来开发和完善一个概念模型,以了解学术医疗中心的病房团队动态如何影响诊断过程。首先,我们系统地检索了现有文献,寻找团队动力学的概念模型和实证研究。然后,我们进行了实地观察和专题分析,以完善我们的模型。结果:我们提出了一个关于病房团队动态如何影响诊断过程的概念模型,该模型可作为该领域未来研究和干预的路线图。我们确定了与卓越诊断相关的三个未被充分探索的团队动态领域,值得未来研究(1):病房团队结构(例如,团队角色,责任)(2);环境因素(例如,时间限制、团队成员的位置、文化、多样性);(3)突发状态(共享心理模型、心理安全、团队信任和团队情绪)。结论:优化诊断过程以实现卓越诊断可能取决于解决我们模型中呈现的所有潜在障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
期刊最新文献
Spurious test results as a diagnostic clue - pseudohyponatremia revealing multiple myeloma. Raised alpha fetoprotein in cirrhotic liver with colorectal liver metastasis mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and review of literature. Rationalisation of a thrombophilia panel using laboratory medicine Delphi-like consensus evaluation and secondary artificial intelligence-based simulation assessment. Trends in diagnostic error research across Asia: a quantitative content analysis. Visual heuristics and basal cell carcinoma: pitfalls and strategies for clinical vigilance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1