Tancia Pires, Saikiran Pendem, Jaseemudheen M M, Priyanka
Introduction: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) is a non-invasive, robust MRI technique that generates multiple contrast-weighted images by acquiring a single MRI sequence within a few minutes, along with quantitative maps, automatic brain segmentation, and volumetry. Since its inception, it has undergone technical advancements and has also been tested for feasibility in various organs and pathological conditions. This scoping review comprehensively pinpoints the critical technical aspects and maps the wide range of clinical applications/benefits of SyMRI.
Content: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL Ultimate, using appropriate keywords related to SyMRI. A total of 99 studies were included after a 2-step screening process. Data related to the technical factors and clinical application was charted.
Summary: SyMRI provides quantitative maps and segmentation techniques comparable to conventional MRI and has demonstrated feasibility and applications across neuroimaging, musculoskeletal, abdominal and breast pathologies spanning the entire human lifespan, from prenatal development to advanced age. Certain drawbacks related to image quality have been encountered that can be overcome with technical advances, especially AI-based algorithms.
Outlook: SyMRI has immense potential for being incorporated into routine imaging for various pathologies due to its added advantage of providing quantitative measurements for more robust diagnostic and prognostic work-up with faster acquisitions and greater post-processing options.
{"title":"Technical aspects and clinical applications of synthetic MRI: a scoping review.","authors":"Tancia Pires, Saikiran Pendem, Jaseemudheen M M, Priyanka","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) is a non-invasive, robust MRI technique that generates multiple contrast-weighted images by acquiring a single MRI sequence within a few minutes, along with quantitative maps, automatic brain segmentation, and volumetry. Since its inception, it has undergone technical advancements and has also been tested for feasibility in various organs and pathological conditions. This scoping review comprehensively pinpoints the critical technical aspects and maps the wide range of clinical applications/benefits of SyMRI.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL Ultimate, using appropriate keywords related to SyMRI. A total of 99 studies were included after a 2-step screening process. Data related to the technical factors and clinical application was charted.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SyMRI provides quantitative maps and segmentation techniques comparable to conventional MRI and has demonstrated feasibility and applications across neuroimaging, musculoskeletal, abdominal and breast pathologies spanning the entire human lifespan, from prenatal development to advanced age. Certain drawbacks related to image quality have been encountered that can be overcome with technical advances, especially AI-based algorithms.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>SyMRI has immense potential for being incorporated into routine imaging for various pathologies due to its added advantage of providing quantitative measurements for more robust diagnostic and prognostic work-up with faster acquisitions and greater post-processing options.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study reported a large cohort of fetal blood analysis of various hemoglobinopathies.
Methods: A total of 371 fetal blood specimens were recruited. Complete blood count and hemoglobin (Hb) analysis using capillary electrophoresis were performed. Genotypes were defined by DNA analysis.
Results: Among 371 fetuses, 36 were non-thalassemic and 29 thalassemia genotypes were identified in the remaining 335 fetuses. Fetuses with β-thalassemia and Hb E traits, homozygous Hb E, and Hb E-β0-thalassemia had similar hematological parameters as those of non-thalassemic. However, the levels of Hb A in β-thalassemia and Hb E traits were approximately half of that observed in the non-thalassemic fetuses. As for Hb E, fetuses with a single copy of the βE-globin gene in the Hb E trait and Hb E-β0-thalassemia had lower Hb E levels as compared to that of the homozygous Hb E. For α-thalassemia, fetuses with one or two α-globin gene defects had small changes in hematological parameters, but variable Hb Bart's levels were observed. Fetuses with Hb H and Hb H-CS diseases had moderate anemia, whereas those with homozygous Hb CS and Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis had severe anemia. Identification of the fetuses with Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis with various genetic interactions allows the exact re-location of electrophoretic mobilities of various embryonic Hbs.
Conclusions: This study confirmed the genetic heterogeneity of hemoglobinopathies among the fetuses and fetal blood analysis are useful for presumptive diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies. The results should facilitate a prevention and control program of hemoglobinopathies in the region.
{"title":"Fetal hematological phenotypes of various hemoglobinopathies and demonstration of embryonic hemoglobins on capillary electrophoresis: a large cohort data from prenatal screening program.","authors":"Kritsada Singha, Supawadee Yamsri, Attawut Chaibunruang, Hataichanok Srivorakun, Anupong Pansuwan, Kanokwan Sanchaisuriya, Goonnapa Fucharoen, Supan Fucharoen","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study reported a large cohort of fetal blood analysis of various hemoglobinopathies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 371 fetal blood specimens were recruited. Complete blood count and hemoglobin (Hb) analysis using capillary electrophoresis were performed. Genotypes were defined by DNA analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 371 fetuses, 36 were non-thalassemic and 29 thalassemia genotypes were identified in the remaining 335 fetuses. Fetuses with β-thalassemia and Hb E traits, homozygous Hb E, and Hb E-β<sup>0</sup>-thalassemia had similar hematological parameters as those of non-thalassemic. However, the levels of Hb A in β-thalassemia and Hb E traits were approximately half of that observed in the non-thalassemic fetuses. As for Hb E, fetuses with a single copy of the β<sup>E</sup>-globin gene in the Hb E trait and Hb E-β<sup>0</sup>-thalassemia had lower Hb E levels as compared to that of the homozygous Hb E. For α-thalassemia, fetuses with one or two α-globin gene defects had small changes in hematological parameters, but variable Hb Bart's levels were observed. Fetuses with Hb H and Hb H-CS diseases had moderate anemia, whereas those with homozygous Hb CS and Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis had severe anemia. Identification of the fetuses with Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis with various genetic interactions allows the exact re-location of electrophoretic mobilities of various embryonic Hbs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed the genetic heterogeneity of hemoglobinopathies among the fetuses and fetal blood analysis are useful for presumptive diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies. The results should facilitate a prevention and control program of hemoglobinopathies in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143058383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reversible systemic vasoconstriction syndrome: a new diagnostic family of generalized vasospasm in multiple organs.","authors":"Mei Uehara, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroko Arioka","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143051728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Dengue is a viral infection caused by any one of the four related dengue virus (DENV) serotypes, 1-4. DENV is a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the genus Flavivirus. Dengue can cause a range of symptoms, from mild to severe life-threatening illness. Currently, treatment for DENV is limited to supportive care, with better outcomes achieved through early diagnosis. The WHO has suggested that dengue mortality can be reduced to nearly zero by implementing appropriate clinical management strategies, such as early laboratory diagnosis. This calls for diagnostic approaches that combine high sensitivity and specificity, while also being suitable for point-of-care testing (POCT) in remote locations with minimal staff training and low testing costs.
Content: In this paper, we outline the limitations of existing confirmatory dengue diagnostic methods, such as ELISA and RT-PCR, which are time-consuming, expensive, and require skilled personnel. We also highlight alternative strategies to overcome these challenges. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the growing clinical demand for diagnosing severe dengue to reduce the risk of death, which must be addressed by next-generation dengue diagnostic approaches.
Summary: We propose the adoption of alternative strategies, such as fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), which have the potential to overcome the limitations of existing dengue diagnostic methods.
Outlook: Improvements in dengue diagnosis, with a specific focus on identifying severe dengue in POCT setting, can help achieve the goal of zero deaths from dengue.
{"title":"Overview of dengue diagnostic limitations and potential strategies for improvement.","authors":"Aruna Devi Selvaraj, Anand Ramaian Santhaseela, Elavarasan Tamilmani","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dengue is a viral infection caused by any one of the four related dengue virus (DENV) serotypes, 1-4. DENV is a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the genus <i>Flavivirus</i>. Dengue can cause a range of symptoms, from mild to severe life-threatening illness. Currently, treatment for DENV is limited to supportive care, with better outcomes achieved through early diagnosis. The WHO has suggested that dengue mortality can be reduced to nearly zero by implementing appropriate clinical management strategies, such as early laboratory diagnosis. This calls for diagnostic approaches that combine high sensitivity and specificity, while also being suitable for point-of-care testing (POCT) in remote locations with minimal staff training and low testing costs.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In this paper, we outline the limitations of existing confirmatory dengue diagnostic methods, such as ELISA and RT-PCR, which are time-consuming, expensive, and require skilled personnel. We also highlight alternative strategies to overcome these challenges. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the growing clinical demand for diagnosing severe dengue to reduce the risk of death, which must be addressed by next-generation dengue diagnostic approaches.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We propose the adoption of alternative strategies, such as fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), which have the potential to overcome the limitations of existing dengue diagnostic methods.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Improvements in dengue diagnosis, with a specific focus on identifying severe dengue in POCT setting, can help achieve the goal of zero deaths from dengue.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143051710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of cardiovascular events and showed high prevalence and healthcare costs in 2019. However, CAD screening for cardiovascular event prevention is invasive and expensive. This study aims to estimate the ability of a noninvasive method, pulse wave velocity (PWV), to detect the presence or absence of coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence was conducted, comparing PWV with the gold standard diagnostic method, angiography. The literature search was systematically performed in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases from inception to August 2024. Study quality assessment was performed using the Diagnostic Accuracy Study Quality Assessment Tool (QUADAS-2). Publication bias was assessed using the method proposed by Deeks. Statistical analyses were performed with the STATA SE software, version 15. The eight included studies had a cross-sectional design, in which the presence of CAD was measured simultaneously by PWV and angiography. To assess the accuracy of the tests, the overall sensitivity and specificity were combined into a single value, the diagnostic odds ratio (dOR), which provided a value of 3.61, indicating a high probability of detecting CAD by PWV. The implementation of PWV as a screening technique in healthcare centers could bring great benefits to patients with suspected CAD and increase efficiency in the use of healthcare resources.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是心血管事件的主要原因,在2019年显示出高患病率和高医疗成本。然而,用于预防心血管事件的CAD筛查是侵入性的且昂贵的。本研究旨在评估一种无创方法,即脉冲波速度(PWV),在疑似CAD患者中检测冠状动脉疾病存在与否的能力。对现有证据进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,将PWV与金标准诊断方法血管造影进行了比较。文献检索系统地在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行,检索时间从成立到2024年8月。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)进行研究质量评估。采用Deeks提出的方法评估发表偏倚。统计学分析采用STATA SE软件,版本15。纳入的8项研究采用横断面设计,其中通过PWV和血管造影同时测量CAD的存在。为了评估测试的准确性,将总体敏感性和特异性合并为一个单一值,即诊断优势比(dOR),该值为3.61,表明PWV检测CAD的概率很高。在医疗中心实施PWV作为筛查技术,可以为疑似CAD患者带来极大的好处,提高医疗资源的使用效率。
{"title":"Accuracy of pulse wave velocity for screening coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Carla-Geovanna Lever-Megina, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Cristina Morales-Berenkova, Germán Cabeza-Arrebola, Alicia Saz-Lara","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0193","DOIUrl":"10.1515/dx-2024-0193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of cardiovascular events and showed high prevalence and healthcare costs in 2019. However, CAD screening for cardiovascular event prevention is invasive and expensive. This study aims to estimate the ability of a noninvasive method, pulse wave velocity (PWV), to detect the presence or absence of coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence was conducted, comparing PWV with the gold standard diagnostic method, angiography. The literature search was systematically performed in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases from inception to August 2024. Study quality assessment was performed using the Diagnostic Accuracy Study Quality Assessment Tool (QUADAS-2). Publication bias was assessed using the method proposed by Deeks. Statistical analyses were performed with the STATA SE software, version 15. The eight included studies had a cross-sectional design, in which the presence of CAD was measured simultaneously by PWV and angiography. To assess the accuracy of the tests, the overall sensitivity and specificity were combined into a single value, the diagnostic odds ratio (dOR), which provided a value of 3.61, indicating a high probability of detecting CAD by PWV. The implementation of PWV as a screening technique in healthcare centers could bring great benefits to patients with suspected CAD and increase efficiency in the use of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cassandra Siffert, François Romanet, Marion Desmazières, Priscilla Drault, Géraud Gourjon
Objectives: Although cognitive biases are one of the most frequent causes of diagnostic errors, their influence remains underestimated in allied health professions, especially in osteopathy. Yet, a part of osteopathic clinical reasoning and diagnosis rely on the practitioner's intuition and subjective haptic perceptions. The aim of this study is to highlight links between the cognitive biases perceived by the practitioner to understand cognitive patterns during osteopathic diagnosis, and to suggest debiasing strategies.
Methods: A mixed method based on an explanatory sequential type is used. (QUAN→QUAL). A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 272 French osteopaths and three focus groups including 24 osteopaths were carried out. The quantitative analysis includes multinominal logistic regression models and multiple correspondence analysis. The qualitative analysis is based on the framework method (within thematic analysis) and followed a step-by-step guide (Gale et al.).
Results: Among 19 selected biases, osteopaths feel to be affected by 9.4 ± 0.28 biases (range [1-19], median=9). Some presumed biases would be associated, and socio-demographic (gender, age) and professional (experience and types of practice) factors would modify how practitioners perceive the presence of biases. Main debiasing solutions are supervision and transcultural clinical competences.
Conclusions: Osteopaths believe their diagnosis is impaired by the presence of cognitive biases as observed in clinical reality. Some biases are shared with medical doctors, but others are more specific to osteopaths, such as confirmation bias. To reduce their effect, the practitioner needs to be aware of these cognitive patterns of clinical reasoning, understand the patient and himself better, and use objective tests.
{"title":"Cognitive biases in osteopathic diagnosis: a mixed study among French osteopaths.","authors":"Cassandra Siffert, François Romanet, Marion Desmazières, Priscilla Drault, Géraud Gourjon","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although cognitive biases are one of the most frequent causes of diagnostic errors, their influence remains underestimated in allied health professions, especially in osteopathy. Yet, a part of osteopathic clinical reasoning and diagnosis rely on the practitioner's intuition and subjective haptic perceptions. The aim of this study is to highlight links between the cognitive biases perceived by the practitioner to understand cognitive patterns during osteopathic diagnosis, and to suggest debiasing strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method based on an explanatory sequential type is used. (QUAN→QUAL). A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 272 French osteopaths and three focus groups including 24 osteopaths were carried out. The quantitative analysis includes multinominal logistic regression models and multiple correspondence analysis. The qualitative analysis is based on the framework method (within thematic analysis) and followed a step-by-step guide (Gale et al.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19 selected biases, osteopaths feel to be affected by 9.4 ± 0.28 biases (range [1-19], median=9). Some presumed biases would be associated, and socio-demographic (gender, age) and professional (experience and types of practice) factors would modify how practitioners perceive the presence of biases. Main debiasing solutions are supervision and transcultural clinical competences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osteopaths believe their diagnosis is impaired by the presence of cognitive biases as observed in clinical reality. Some biases are shared with medical doctors, but others are more specific to osteopaths, such as confirmation bias. To reduce their effect, the practitioner needs to be aware of these cognitive patterns of clinical reasoning, understand the patient and himself better, and use objective tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James G Boyle, Matthew R Walters, Fiona M Burton, Catherine Paton, Martin Hughes, Susan Jamieson, Steven J Durning
Objectives: Diagnostic error is a global emergency. Context specificity is likely a source of the alarming rate of error and refers to the vexing phenomenon whereby a physician can see two patients with the same presenting complaint, identical history and examination findings, but due to the presence of contextual factors, decides on two different diagnoses. Studies have not empirically addressed the potential role of context specificity in management reasoning and errors with a diagnosis may not consistently translate to actual patient care.
Methods: We investigated the effect of context specificity on management reasoning in individuals working within a simulated internal medicine environment. Participants completed two ten minute back to back common encounters. The clinical content of each encounter was identical. One encounter featured the presence of carefully controlled contextual factors (CF+ vs. CF-) designed to distract from the correct diagnosis and management. Immediately after each encounter participants completed a post encounter form.
Results: Twenty senior medical students participated. The leading diagnosis score was higher (mean 0.88; SEM 0.07) for the CF- encounter compared with the CF+ encounter (0.58; 0.1; 95 % CI 0.04-0.56; p=0.02). Management reasoning scores were higher (mean 5.48; SEM 0.66) for the CF- encounter compared with the CF+ encounter (3.5; 0.56; 95 % CI 0.69-3.26; p=0.01). We demonstrated context specificity in both diagnostic and management reasoning.
Conclusions: This study is the first to empirically demonstrate that management reasoning, which directly impacts the patient, is also influenced by context specificity, providing additional evidence of context specificity's role in unwanted variance in health care.
目的:诊断错误是一个全球性的紧急事件。情境特异性可能是错误率令人担忧的一个来源,它指的是一种令人烦恼的现象,即医生可以看到两个具有相同主诉、相同病史和检查结果的患者,但由于情境因素的存在,却做出了两种不同的诊断。研究没有经经验地解决背景特异性在管理推理中的潜在作用,并且诊断错误可能不一致地转化为实际的患者护理。方法:我们研究了情境特异性对在模拟内科环境中工作的个体管理推理的影响。参与者完成了两个10分钟背靠背的共同接触。每次接触的临床内容都是相同的。一次遭遇的特点是存在精心控制的环境因素(CF+ vs. CF-),旨在分散正确的诊断和管理。每次会面后,参与者立即填写一份会面后表格。结果:20名高年级医学生参与。先期诊断评分较高(平均0.88;CF-相遇的SEM为0.07,而CF+相遇的SEM为0.58;0.1;95 % ci 0.04-0.56;p = 0.02)。管理推理得分较高(平均5.48分;CF-遭遇的SEM为0.66),而CF+遭遇的SEM为3.5;0.56;95 % ci 0.69-3.26;p = 0.01)。我们证明了诊断和管理推理的上下文特异性。结论:本研究首次实证证明了直接影响患者的管理推理也受到情境特异性的影响,为情境特异性在医疗保健中不受欢迎的差异中所起的作用提供了额外的证据。
{"title":"On context specificity and management reasoning: moving beyond diagnosis.","authors":"James G Boyle, Matthew R Walters, Fiona M Burton, Catherine Paton, Martin Hughes, Susan Jamieson, Steven J Durning","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnostic error is a global emergency. Context specificity is likely a source of the alarming rate of error and refers to the vexing phenomenon whereby a physician can see two patients with the same presenting complaint, identical history and examination findings, but due to the presence of contextual factors, decides on two different diagnoses. Studies have not empirically addressed the potential role of context specificity in management reasoning and errors with a diagnosis may not consistently translate to actual patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the effect of context specificity on management reasoning in individuals working within a simulated internal medicine environment. Participants completed two ten minute back to back common encounters. The clinical content of each encounter was identical. One encounter featured the presence of carefully controlled contextual factors (CF+ vs. CF-) designed to distract from the correct diagnosis and management. Immediately after each encounter participants completed a post encounter form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty senior medical students participated. The leading diagnosis score was higher (mean 0.88; SEM 0.07) for the CF- encounter compared with the CF+ encounter (0.58; 0.1; 95 % CI 0.04-0.56; p=0.02). Management reasoning scores were higher (mean 5.48; SEM 0.66) for the CF- encounter compared with the CF+ encounter (3.5; 0.56; 95 % CI 0.69-3.26; p=0.01). We demonstrated context specificity in both diagnostic and management reasoning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to empirically demonstrate that management reasoning, which directly impacts the patient, is also influenced by context specificity, providing additional evidence of context specificity's role in unwanted variance in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142946442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jozsef Kiraly, Andras Berzi, Robert El-Kareh, Eniko Sebestyen, Dora Ujvarosy, Miklos Emri, Harjit Pal Bhattoa, Janos Kappelmayer, Kristen E Miller, Gabor Toth
Objectives: To examine factors impacting diagnostic evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by analyzing the test ordering patterns and provider decision-making within a universal health coverage system in Hungary.
Methods: We analyzed test orders for suspected DVT between 2007 and 2020, and the financial framework influencing diagnostic practices. An anonymous survey was also conducted among Emergency Department physicians to explore factors influencing diagnostic decision-making.
Results: A total of 6,821 patients were identified. From 2008 to 2013, the most common diagnostic approach combined D-dimer and duplex ultrasound tests (64.5 %), followed by sole ultrasound (20.5 %) and sole D-dimer (15 %) testing. A marked shift occurred from 2014 onward, with sole ultrasound rising to 88 % of cases by 2018-2020, while combined testing and sole D-dimer orders decreased to 7.9 and 4 %, respectively. In survey results, time efficiency emerged as a key factor for bypassing D-dimer testing, cited by 75 % of physicians. 45 % believed D-dimer costs were comparable to or higher than duplex ultrasound. Financial analysis revealed that the outdated performance points system misrepresented actual costs, resulting in duplex ultrasound being significantly underfunded, which impacts the Radiology Department. This discrepancy contributes to higher national level expenses, driven by the increased reliance on ultrasound.
Conclusions: We found diagnostic practices deviating from international diagnostic guidelines, with an increase in duplex ultrasound over D-dimer. This shift, allowed by an outdated financing structure, increases overall costs for the healthcare system. Revising financial frameworks to reflect true costs is essential for sustainable operations in universal health coverage systems.
{"title":"Breaking the guidelines: how financial unawareness fuels guideline deviations and inefficient DVT diagnostics.","authors":"Jozsef Kiraly, Andras Berzi, Robert El-Kareh, Eniko Sebestyen, Dora Ujvarosy, Miklos Emri, Harjit Pal Bhattoa, Janos Kappelmayer, Kristen E Miller, Gabor Toth","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine factors impacting diagnostic evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by analyzing the test ordering patterns and provider decision-making within a universal health coverage system in Hungary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed test orders for suspected DVT between 2007 and 2020, and the financial framework influencing diagnostic practices. An anonymous survey was also conducted among Emergency Department physicians to explore factors influencing diagnostic decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,821 patients were identified. From 2008 to 2013, the most common diagnostic approach combined D-dimer and duplex ultrasound tests (64.5 %), followed by sole ultrasound (20.5 %) and sole D-dimer (15 %) testing. A marked shift occurred from 2014 onward, with sole ultrasound rising to 88 % of cases by 2018-2020, while combined testing and sole D-dimer orders decreased to 7.9 and 4 %, respectively. In survey results, time efficiency emerged as a key factor for bypassing D-dimer testing, cited by 75 % of physicians. 45 % believed D-dimer costs were comparable to or higher than duplex ultrasound. Financial analysis revealed that the outdated performance points system misrepresented actual costs, resulting in duplex ultrasound being significantly underfunded, which impacts the Radiology Department. This discrepancy contributes to higher national level expenses, driven by the increased reliance on ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found diagnostic practices deviating from international diagnostic guidelines, with an increase in duplex ultrasound over D-dimer. This shift, allowed by an outdated financing structure, increases overall costs for the healthcare system. Revising financial frameworks to reflect true costs is essential for sustainable operations in universal health coverage systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katherine Gavinski, Deborah DiNardo, Scott D Rothenberger, Eliana Bonifacino
Objectives: Published clinical reasoning curricula are limited, and measuring curricular impact has proven difficult. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a broad-reaching, multi-level reasoning curricula by measuring utilization of clinical reasoning terminology in published abstracts.
Methods: In 2014, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) created a clinical reasoning curriculum with interventions at the student, resident, and faculty levels with the goal of bringing reasoning education to the forefront. This study was a retrospective analysis of published clinical vignettes of the Society of General Internal Medicine prior to local curricular intervention (2014), post-curricular intervention (2018), and on follow-up (2022). UPMC-affiliated abstracts were compared to abstracts containing reasoning terms from all other institutions, at each time point.
Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the use of clinical reasoning terms by UPMC-affiliated participants from 2014 to 2018. Non-UPMC submissions, saw a smaller, but still significant increase in the use of clinical reasoning terms. There was a decline in clinical reasoning term use from 2018 to 2022, both at UPMC and nationally.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that widespread clinical reasoning curricula can increase interest in and use of clinical reasoning terminology. Further work is needed to develop creative assessment tools for reasoning curricula.
{"title":"Using language to evaluate curricular impact: a novel approach in assessing clinical reasoning curricula.","authors":"Katherine Gavinski, Deborah DiNardo, Scott D Rothenberger, Eliana Bonifacino","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Published clinical reasoning curricula are limited, and measuring curricular impact has proven difficult. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a broad-reaching, multi-level reasoning curricula by measuring utilization of clinical reasoning terminology in published abstracts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2014, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) created a clinical reasoning curriculum with interventions at the student, resident, and faculty levels with the goal of bringing reasoning education to the forefront. This study was a retrospective analysis of published clinical vignettes of the Society of General Internal Medicine prior to local curricular intervention (2014), post-curricular intervention (2018), and on follow-up (2022). UPMC-affiliated abstracts were compared to abstracts containing reasoning terms from all other institutions, at each time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant increase in the use of clinical reasoning terms by UPMC-affiliated participants from 2014 to 2018. Non-UPMC submissions, saw a smaller, but still significant increase in the use of clinical reasoning terms. There was a decline in clinical reasoning term use from 2018 to 2022, both at UPMC and nationally.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that widespread clinical reasoning curricula can increase interest in and use of clinical reasoning terminology. Further work is needed to develop creative assessment tools for reasoning curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}