[Job resources and work engagement: the mediating role of basic need satisfaction].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Medycyna pracy Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.13075/mp.5893.01257
Łukasz Kapica, Łukasz Baka, Aleksandra Stachura-Krzyształowicz
{"title":"[Job resources and work engagement: the mediating role of basic need satisfaction].","authors":"Łukasz Kapica,&nbsp;Łukasz Baka,&nbsp;Aleksandra Stachura-Krzyształowicz","doi":"10.13075/mp.5893.01257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary work psychology indicates that improving the functioning of employees and organizations takes place not only through the prevention of harmful factors but also through the development of positive attitudes towards work. According to the job demands-resources model, it can be assumed that resources are an important factor leading to work engagement. However, the authors of this concept also suggest that the role of resources is also to meet needs. In turn, according to the self-determination theory, the key to the development of intrinsic motivation and thus also work engagement is the satisfaction of basic needs. Therefore, hypotheses argue that resources in the form of the influence at work, possibilities for development, and social community at work are positively related to work engagement. And also that the satisfaction of basic needs, respectively autonomy, competence, and relatedness, are the mediators of these relationships.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected among 200 workers aged 18-35, employed to work in direct contact with customers. Job resources were measured with the <i>Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire</i> (COPSOQ II) subscales. Basic psychological need satisfaction was measured with the <i>Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale at Work</i>. Work Engagement was measured with the <i>Utrecht Work Engagement Scale</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analyses with mediation effects were performed for 3 models. It has been shown that Influence at work is a predictor of Work engagement and this relationship is mediated by Autonomy satisfaction. Possibilities for development are positively related to Work engagement, in this relationship, the mediator is Competence satisfaction. In the relationship between the Social community at work and Work engagement, the mediator is the relatedness satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results have confirmed hypotheses regarding the mediating role of need satisfaction in the relationship between job resources and work engagement. Despite the limitations of the study, the results obtained confirm and develop the job demands-resources and self-determination theories. Med Pr. 2022;73(5):407-16.</p>","PeriodicalId":18749,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna pracy","volume":"73 5","pages":"407-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna pracy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contemporary work psychology indicates that improving the functioning of employees and organizations takes place not only through the prevention of harmful factors but also through the development of positive attitudes towards work. According to the job demands-resources model, it can be assumed that resources are an important factor leading to work engagement. However, the authors of this concept also suggest that the role of resources is also to meet needs. In turn, according to the self-determination theory, the key to the development of intrinsic motivation and thus also work engagement is the satisfaction of basic needs. Therefore, hypotheses argue that resources in the form of the influence at work, possibilities for development, and social community at work are positively related to work engagement. And also that the satisfaction of basic needs, respectively autonomy, competence, and relatedness, are the mediators of these relationships.

Material and methods: Data were collected among 200 workers aged 18-35, employed to work in direct contact with customers. Job resources were measured with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II) subscales. Basic psychological need satisfaction was measured with the Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Frustration Scale at Work. Work Engagement was measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.

Results: Regression analyses with mediation effects were performed for 3 models. It has been shown that Influence at work is a predictor of Work engagement and this relationship is mediated by Autonomy satisfaction. Possibilities for development are positively related to Work engagement, in this relationship, the mediator is Competence satisfaction. In the relationship between the Social community at work and Work engagement, the mediator is the relatedness satisfaction.

Conclusions: The results have confirmed hypotheses regarding the mediating role of need satisfaction in the relationship between job resources and work engagement. Despite the limitations of the study, the results obtained confirm and develop the job demands-resources and self-determination theories. Med Pr. 2022;73(5):407-16.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[工作资源与工作投入:基本需求满足的中介作用]。
背景:当代工作心理学表明,改善员工和组织的功能不仅要通过预防有害因素,还要通过培养积极的工作态度。根据工作需求-资源模型,可以假设资源是导致工作投入的重要因素。然而,这一概念的作者也提出,资源的作用也是满足需求。反过来,根据自我决定理论,发展内在动机以及工作投入的关键是基本需求的满足。因此,假设认为,以工作影响力、发展可能性和工作中的社会社区为形式的资源与工作投入呈正相关。同时基本需求的满足,自主性,能力和亲缘性,是这些关系的中介。资料与方法:调查对象为200名年龄在18-35岁之间,从事与客户直接接触工作的员工。工作资源测量采用哥本哈根社会心理问卷(COPSOQ II)子量表。基本心理需求满意度采用《基本心理需求满意度及工作挫折量表》进行测量。工作投入采用乌得勒支工作投入量表进行测量。结果:对3个模型进行了具有中介效应的回归分析。研究表明,工作中的影响力是工作投入的预测因子,而这种关系是由自主性满意度介导的。发展可能性与工作投入正相关,在这种关系中,能力满意度是中介。在工作社会共同体与工作投入的关系中,关系满意度是中介。结论:研究结果证实了需求满足在工作资源与工作投入关系中的中介作用假说。尽管本研究存在一定的局限性,但研究结果证实并发展了工作需求-资源理论和自我决定理论。中国生物医学工程学报,2011;33(5):444 - 444。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medycyna pracy
Medycyna pracy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers, review papers and case studies in Polish and English. The subject matter of the articles includes occupational pathology, physical, chemical and biological agents at workplace, toxicology, mutagenesis, health policy, health management, health care, epidemiology, etc. The magazine also includes reports from national and international scientific conferences on occupational medicine. It also contains letters to the editor. Each first-in-year issue of the magazine comprises former-year indices of authors and keywords.
期刊最新文献
Erratum to Raposo et al. “Increasing awareness and empathy among university students through immersive exercises – testing of the virtual reality application: A pilot study” (Med Pr 2023;74(3):187–197) Accidents rate of the Polish State Fire Service officers during service in the years 2015–2022 Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation The influence of silver nanoparticles on the process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the context of cancer metastases Satisfaction with nursing care of hospitalized patients: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1