Psychostimulants for Children: Are We Over or Under Dosing?

Journal of addiction psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-22
Kenneth Blum, Catherine Dennen, Paul R Carney, Elizabeth Gilley, Panayotis K Thanos, Eric R Braverman, David Baron, Colin Hanna, Edward J Modestino, Mark S Gold, Igor Elman, Rajendra D Badgaiyan
{"title":"Psychostimulants for Children: Are We Over or Under Dosing?","authors":"Kenneth Blum, Catherine Dennen, Paul R Carney, Elizabeth Gilley, Panayotis K Thanos, Eric R Braverman, David Baron, Colin Hanna, Edward J Modestino, Mark S Gold, Igor Elman, Rajendra D Badgaiyan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An estimated 3% to 10% of school children meet the DSM-V criteria for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), however, to be over-diagnosed, the rate of children inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD (false positives) would have to be larger than the number of children with ADHD who are under-identified and not diagnosed (false negatives). Accordingly, a number of investigators take the position that under-treatment with psychostimulants, especially in children and adolescence, will result in continued ADHD symptomatology including future Substance Use Disorder (SUD). However, other researchers and clinicians believe otherwise and espouse laudable arguments for caution and prolonged methamphetamine treatment. While there is ongoing controversy of the role of genetics and epigenetics linked to ADHD, it seems clear that a number of dopaminergic genes and their risk polymorphisms act as DNA antecedents impacted by epigenetic induced methylation. Our hypothesis and literature review suggest that one possible solution is to embrace non addictive interventions to induce global dopamine homeostasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An estimated 3% to 10% of school children meet the DSM-V criteria for ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), however, to be over-diagnosed, the rate of children inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD (false positives) would have to be larger than the number of children with ADHD who are under-identified and not diagnosed (false negatives). Accordingly, a number of investigators take the position that under-treatment with psychostimulants, especially in children and adolescence, will result in continued ADHD symptomatology including future Substance Use Disorder (SUD). However, other researchers and clinicians believe otherwise and espouse laudable arguments for caution and prolonged methamphetamine treatment. While there is ongoing controversy of the role of genetics and epigenetics linked to ADHD, it seems clear that a number of dopaminergic genes and their risk polymorphisms act as DNA antecedents impacted by epigenetic induced methylation. Our hypothesis and literature review suggest that one possible solution is to embrace non addictive interventions to induce global dopamine homeostasis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童精神兴奋剂:我们用药过量还是不足?
据估计,3%-10% 的学龄儿童符合 DSM-V 多动症(注意力缺陷/多动障碍)的标准,但是,如果要达到过度诊断的程度,那么被不恰当地诊断为多动症(假阳性)的儿童人数必须多于未被充分识别和诊断为多动症(假阴性)的儿童人数。因此,一些研究人员认为,精神刺激剂治疗不足,尤其是在儿童和青少年时期,将导致持续的多动症症状,包括未来的药物使用障碍(SUD)。然而,其他研究人员和临床医生却不这么认为,他们支持谨慎和延长甲基苯丙胺治疗时间的观点,这一点值得称赞。虽然遗传学和表观遗传学在多动症中的作用一直存在争议,但似乎很清楚的是,一些多巴胺能基因及其风险多态性是受表观遗传学诱导甲基化影响的 DNA 前体。我们的假设和文献综述表明,一种可能的解决方案是采用非成瘾性干预措施来诱导全球多巴胺平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Summary Document Research on RDS Anti-addiction Modeling: Annotated Bibliography. Is There a Natural, Non-addictive, and Non-anti-reward, Safe, Gene-based Solution to Treat Reward Deficiency Syndrome? KB220 Variants vs GLP-1 Analogs. Solving the Global Opioid Crisis: Incorporating Genetic Addiction Risk Assessment with Personalized Dopaminergic Homeostatic Therapy and Awareness Integration Therapy. Theorizing that Psychedelic Assisted Therapy May Play a Role in the Treatment of Trauma-Induced Personality Disorders. Psychostimulants for Children: Are We Over or Under Dosing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1