Survival outcomes of beta-blocker usage in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986231181338
Hui-Hsia Hsieh, Tien-Yuan Wu, Chi-Hua Chen, Yu-Hung Kuo, Mann-Jen Hour
{"title":"Survival outcomes of beta-blocker usage in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hui-Hsia Hsieh,&nbsp;Tien-Yuan Wu,&nbsp;Chi-Hua Chen,&nbsp;Yu-Hung Kuo,&nbsp;Mann-Jen Hour","doi":"10.1177/20420986231181338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials investigating the effects of beta-blockers (BBs) on cancer are underway. Evidence from preclinical research suggests that BBs could serve as anticancer agents and immune boosters. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of BB use on clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to determine whether BB use is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatment for advanced breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective hospital-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants enrolled were breast cancer patients with advanced HER2-positive status who initiated trastuzumab monotherapy or concomitant therapy with trastuzumab and any dose of BB. The patients were enrolled between January 2012 and May 2021 and divided into three groups based on whether they received a BB or not in the therapeutic regimen: BB-/trastuzumab+, BB+ (non-selective)/trastuzumab+, and BB+ (selective)/trastuzumab+. PFS and OS were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated median PFS in the BB-/trastuzumab+, BB+ (non-selective)/trastuzumab+, and BB+ (selective)/trastuzumab+ groups was 51.93, 21.50, and 20.77 months, respectively. The corresponding OS was 56.70, 29.10, and 27.17 months. The intergroup differences in these durations were significant. Both PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-3.12; <i>p</i> < 0.001]) and OS (adjusted HR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.69-3.57; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were worse when BBs were used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides important evidence that BB use potentially has a negative effect on patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, despite the study's results, cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be appropriately treated in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Other types of drugs can be used to treat CVD, but BB use should be avoided. Large real-world database and prospective studies should be conducted to validate the results of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/88/10.1177_20420986231181338.PMC10288415.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986231181338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials investigating the effects of beta-blockers (BBs) on cancer are underway. Evidence from preclinical research suggests that BBs could serve as anticancer agents and immune boosters. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of BB use on clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

Objectives: The study aimed to determine whether BB use is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Design: Retrospective hospital-based study.

Methods: The participants enrolled were breast cancer patients with advanced HER2-positive status who initiated trastuzumab monotherapy or concomitant therapy with trastuzumab and any dose of BB. The patients were enrolled between January 2012 and May 2021 and divided into three groups based on whether they received a BB or not in the therapeutic regimen: BB-/trastuzumab+, BB+ (non-selective)/trastuzumab+, and BB+ (selective)/trastuzumab+. PFS and OS were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

Results: The estimated median PFS in the BB-/trastuzumab+, BB+ (non-selective)/trastuzumab+, and BB+ (selective)/trastuzumab+ groups was 51.93, 21.50, and 20.77 months, respectively. The corresponding OS was 56.70, 29.10, and 27.17 months. The intergroup differences in these durations were significant. Both PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-3.12; p < 0.001]) and OS (adjusted HR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.69-3.57; p < 0.001) were worse when BBs were used.

Conclusion: Our study provides important evidence that BB use potentially has a negative effect on patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, despite the study's results, cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be appropriately treated in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Other types of drugs can be used to treat CVD, but BB use should be avoided. Large real-world database and prospective studies should be conducted to validate the results of this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受体阻滞剂用于her2阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的生存结局:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:研究-受体阻滞剂(BBs)抗癌作用的临床试验正在进行中。来自临床前研究的证据表明,BBs可以作为抗癌剂和免疫增强剂。关于使用BB对乳腺癌患者临床结果的影响,有相互矛盾的证据。目的:该研究旨在确定BB使用是否与接受抗人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关。设计:基于医院的回顾性研究。方法:纳入的参与者是接受曲妥珠单抗单药治疗或曲妥珠单抗和任何剂量BB联合治疗的晚期her2阳性乳腺癌患者。患者于2012年1月至2021年5月期间入组,并根据治疗方案中是否接受BB分为三组:BB-/曲妥珠单抗+、BB+(非选择性)/曲妥珠单抗+和BB+(选择性)/曲妥珠单抗+。PFS和OS分别为主要和次要终点。结果:BB-/曲妥珠单抗+、BB+(非选择性)/曲妥珠单抗+和BB+(选择性)/曲妥珠单抗+组的估计中位PFS分别为51.93、21.50和20.77个月。相应的OS分别为56.70、29.10和27.17个月。这些持续时间的组间差异是显著的。两个PFS[校正风险比(HR): 2.21, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.56-3.12;结论:我们的研究提供了重要的证据,证明BB对her2阳性晚期乳腺癌患者有潜在的负面影响。然而,尽管研究结果,心血管疾病(CVD)应该适当治疗her2阳性晚期乳腺癌患者。其他类型的药物可用于治疗CVD,但应避免使用BB。需要进行大型真实世界数据库和前瞻性研究来验证本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Assessing potential risk factors for metamizole-induced leukopenia Impact of different doses of esketamine on the incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial Pirfenidone-induced liver injury, a case report of a rare idiosyncratic reaction Fetal exposure to isotretinoin in Saudi Arabia: a multicenter real-world data analysis from 2015 to 2020 Characterizing medication safety incidents in surgical patients: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of incident reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1