The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods in Agenda 2030.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecohealth Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8
D C Grace, O Diall, K Saville, D Warboys, P Ward, I Wild, B D Perry
{"title":"The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods in Agenda 2030.","authors":"D C Grace,&nbsp;O Diall,&nbsp;K Saville,&nbsp;D Warboys,&nbsp;P Ward,&nbsp;I Wild,&nbsp;B D Perry","doi":"10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small farmers produce most food in low- and middle-income countries and most small farmers rely on directly or indirectly working equids (WE). The lack of methods and metrics for assessing the role of WE hampers realisation of WE contributions. Based on literature review and a survey of WE welfare experts, we propose a framework for optimising WE potential based on two axes of sustainable development goals (SDGs) and value chains. WE contribute especially to earning and sparing income (largely in food production) (SDG 1), but also have roles in accessing health and hygiene services and products (SDG 3 and 5), providing edible products (SDG 2), and benefiting women (SDG 6), with lesser contributions to other SDGs, notably climate action (SDG 13). Experts identified barriers to appropriate appreciation of WE contributions, in order to target actions to overcome them. They found WE are neglected because they belong to farmers who are themselves neglected; because information on WE is inadequate; and, because the unique nature and roles of WE means systems, policies, investors, markets and service providers struggle to cater for them. Harnessing WE to optimally contribute to sustainable development will require generating better evidence on their contributions to SDGs, ensuring better integration into ongoing efforts to attain SDGs, and building the WE capacity among development actors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":"19 3","pages":"342-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434516/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Small farmers produce most food in low- and middle-income countries and most small farmers rely on directly or indirectly working equids (WE). The lack of methods and metrics for assessing the role of WE hampers realisation of WE contributions. Based on literature review and a survey of WE welfare experts, we propose a framework for optimising WE potential based on two axes of sustainable development goals (SDGs) and value chains. WE contribute especially to earning and sparing income (largely in food production) (SDG 1), but also have roles in accessing health and hygiene services and products (SDG 3 and 5), providing edible products (SDG 2), and benefiting women (SDG 6), with lesser contributions to other SDGs, notably climate action (SDG 13). Experts identified barriers to appropriate appreciation of WE contributions, in order to target actions to overcome them. They found WE are neglected because they belong to farmers who are themselves neglected; because information on WE is inadequate; and, because the unique nature and roles of WE means systems, policies, investors, markets and service providers struggle to cater for them. Harnessing WE to optimally contribute to sustainable development will require generating better evidence on their contributions to SDGs, ensuring better integration into ongoing efforts to attain SDGs, and building the WE capacity among development actors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《2030年议程》中劳动马对可持续农业和生计的全球贡献。
在低收入和中等收入国家,小农生产了大部分粮食,大多数小农直接或间接依赖于劳动马匹(WE)。缺乏评估生态环境作用的方法和指标阻碍了生态环境贡献的实现。基于文献综述和对WE福利专家的调查,我们提出了一个基于可持续发展目标(sdg)和价值链两个轴的WE潜力优化框架。妇女对赚取和节省收入(主要是粮食生产)(可持续发展目标1)做出了贡献,但在获得健康和卫生服务和产品(可持续发展目标3和5)、提供可食用产品(可持续发展目标2)和使妇女受益(可持续发展目标6)方面也发挥了作用,对其他可持续发展目标的贡献较小,特别是气候行动(可持续发展目标13)。专家们确定了适当赞赏联合国捐助的障碍,以便有针对性地采取行动克服这些障碍。他们发现我们被忽视了,因为我们属于农民,而农民自己也被忽视了;因为关于WE的信息不足;而且,由于WE的独特性质和作用意味着系统、政策、投资者、市场和服务提供商难以满足他们的需求。利用WE以最佳方式为可持续发展做出贡献,需要提供更好的证据,证明它们对可持续发展目标的贡献,确保更好地融入实现可持续发展目标的持续努力,并在发展行为体中建设WE能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
期刊最新文献
Eco-epidemiological Survey of Trypanosoma cruzi in Dogs from Mendoza, Argentina. Serologic and Molecular Evidence of Arboviruses in Nonhuman Primates in Northeast Brazil. Monitoring of Selected Swine Viral Diseases in Peruvian Amazon Peccaries. Pathways to One Health: Enhancing Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Pakistan. Sand Fly Fauna in Urban Parks in the Brazilian Western Amazon: Potential Areas for American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Transmission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1