How the Conviction and Sentencing of "Tiger Mandingo" Modernized Missouri's HIV-Related Statutes in 2021.

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Ryan Jay McElhose
{"title":"How the Conviction and Sentencing of \"Tiger Mandingo\" Modernized Missouri's HIV-Related Statutes in 2021.","authors":"Ryan Jay McElhose","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Michael Johnson or \"Tiger Mandingo\" as he referred to himself on social media, engaged in sexual acts with six different men, all of whom claimed that Michael lied about living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As a result, the State of Missouri charged him with recklessly infecting a partner with HIV exposing or attempting to expose another with HIV. With contradictory trial testimony, no genetic fingerprint testing, and little to no questioning of his sexual partners' credibility, the jury found Michael Johnson guilty of five felony counts which resulted in a 30-year prison sentence. Ultimately the Missouri Court of Appeals overturned Michael Johnson's conviction, but only on the function of a discovery violation; the court did not reach the question of whether Michael's 30-year sentence was cruel and unusual and thus constitutionally impermissible. However, Michael's conviction and sentencing sparked international attention towards how the United States continues to convict people living with HIV under archaic statutes that do not align with medical and scientific advancements or evolving moral standards. Today, HIV is a chronic disease, like diabetes, yet exposure to HIV is still treated as if it is a death sentence in both public opinion and American jurisprudence. These convictions and sentencing guidelines result in harsh sentences for punishments that do not match the crime, misplaces responsibility when two consenting adults choose to have sex, and raises the possibility of exposing people to wrongful convictions. While Missouri and other states have attempted to modernize these antiqued laws, the modernized laws require further analysis to determine whether they in step with the science and if people living with HIV are still vulnerable to harsh sentences and wrongful convictions. This article identifies major legal considerations of the modernized laws and provides guidance on reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Michael Johnson or "Tiger Mandingo" as he referred to himself on social media, engaged in sexual acts with six different men, all of whom claimed that Michael lied about living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As a result, the State of Missouri charged him with recklessly infecting a partner with HIV exposing or attempting to expose another with HIV. With contradictory trial testimony, no genetic fingerprint testing, and little to no questioning of his sexual partners' credibility, the jury found Michael Johnson guilty of five felony counts which resulted in a 30-year prison sentence. Ultimately the Missouri Court of Appeals overturned Michael Johnson's conviction, but only on the function of a discovery violation; the court did not reach the question of whether Michael's 30-year sentence was cruel and unusual and thus constitutionally impermissible. However, Michael's conviction and sentencing sparked international attention towards how the United States continues to convict people living with HIV under archaic statutes that do not align with medical and scientific advancements or evolving moral standards. Today, HIV is a chronic disease, like diabetes, yet exposure to HIV is still treated as if it is a death sentence in both public opinion and American jurisprudence. These convictions and sentencing guidelines result in harsh sentences for punishments that do not match the crime, misplaces responsibility when two consenting adults choose to have sex, and raises the possibility of exposing people to wrongful convictions. While Missouri and other states have attempted to modernize these antiqued laws, the modernized laws require further analysis to determine whether they in step with the science and if people living with HIV are still vulnerable to harsh sentences and wrongful convictions. This article identifies major legal considerations of the modernized laws and provides guidance on reform.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“老虎曼丁戈”的定罪和判决如何在2021年使密苏里州的艾滋病毒相关法规现代化。
迈克尔·约翰逊(Michael Johnson)在社交媒体上称自己为“老虎曼丁哥”(Tiger Mandingo),他与六名不同的男子发生过性行为,这些男子都声称迈克尔谎称自己感染了人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。结果,密苏里州指控他鲁莽地将艾滋病毒传染给伴侣,或试图让另一个人感染艾滋病毒。在相互矛盾的庭审证词、没有基因指纹测试、几乎没有质疑他性伴侣的可信度的情况下,陪审团认定迈克尔·约翰逊犯有五项重罪,并判处他30年监禁。最终,密苏里州上诉法院推翻了对迈克尔·约翰逊的定罪,但只是基于违反证据发现的功能;法庭没有触及迈克尔30年的刑期是否残忍和不寻常,因此在宪法上是不允许的问题。然而,迈克尔的定罪和判决引发了国际社会的关注,即美国如何继续根据与医学和科学进步或不断发展的道德标准不一致的过时法规对艾滋病毒感染者进行定罪。今天,艾滋病毒是一种慢性疾病,就像糖尿病一样,但在公众舆论和美国判例中,感染艾滋病毒仍然被视为被判死刑。这些定罪和量刑指南导致了对与犯罪不符的惩罚的严厉判决,当两个成年人自愿选择发生性行为时,责任错位,并增加了将人们暴露于错误定罪的可能性。虽然密苏里州和其他州试图使这些古老的法律现代化,但现代化的法律需要进一步分析,以确定它们是否与科学同步,以及艾滋病毒感染者是否仍然容易受到严厉的判决和错误的定罪。本文指出了现代化法律的主要法律考虑,并为改革提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice. Distorted Burden Shifting and Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn't Helped the Supreme Court Mature. How Bodily Autonomy Can Fail Against Vaccination Mandates: The Few vs. the Many. When Governors Prioritize Individual Freedom over Public Health: Tort Liability for Government Failures. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1