P2/N95 fit testing and the risk of COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Infection Disease & Health Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.idh.2023.07.005
Brennan Collis , Mark Tacey , Christian McGrath , Victoria Madigan , Marion Kainer , Adrian Tramontana , Craig Aboltins
{"title":"P2/N95 fit testing and the risk of COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers","authors":"Brennan Collis ,&nbsp;Mark Tacey ,&nbsp;Christian McGrath ,&nbsp;Victoria Madigan ,&nbsp;Marion Kainer ,&nbsp;Adrian Tramontana ,&nbsp;Craig Aboltins","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Guidelines recommend healthcare workers (HCWs) undertake fit testing of P2/N95 respirators to mitigate the risk of infectious aerosols, however few studies have assessed whether fit testing reduces COVID-19 infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst HCWs across two tertiary health services in Melbourne, Australia during a period of low community transmission. Institution-wide quantitative fit testing and detailed questionnaires assessing COVID-19 acquisition risk factors were undertaken from September 2020. HCWs diagnosed with COVID-19 in the period prior to the fit testing program (February 1st – August 31st 2020) were matched on a 1:3 ratio to HCWs who had not been diagnosed with COVID-19. Risk factors for COVID-19 acquisition, including fit testing outcome, were compared between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1571 HCWs took part in fit testing programs. Seventy-two (4.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 within the study period. Younger age, nursing staff, close contact with a COVID-19 case, and working longer periods in wards with COVID-19 patients, were associated with COVID-19 infection. After matching for intensity of occupational exposure to infectious aerosols, close contact was the only independent variable associated with COVID-19 infection (OR 3.50, 95% CI:1.65–7.44, p = 0.001). Adequate fit test for the respirator predominately worn before the fit testing period was not associated with COVID-19 (OR 1.08, 95% CI:0.59–1.98, p = 0.815).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After controlling for intensity of occupational exposure to infectious aerosols, P2/N95 respirator fit testing was not associated with reduced risk of COVID-19 infection. The utility of widespread fit testing to reduce HCW COVID-19 infections should be reconsidered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages 8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123000421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guidelines recommend healthcare workers (HCWs) undertake fit testing of P2/N95 respirators to mitigate the risk of infectious aerosols, however few studies have assessed whether fit testing reduces COVID-19 infection.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst HCWs across two tertiary health services in Melbourne, Australia during a period of low community transmission. Institution-wide quantitative fit testing and detailed questionnaires assessing COVID-19 acquisition risk factors were undertaken from September 2020. HCWs diagnosed with COVID-19 in the period prior to the fit testing program (February 1st – August 31st 2020) were matched on a 1:3 ratio to HCWs who had not been diagnosed with COVID-19. Risk factors for COVID-19 acquisition, including fit testing outcome, were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 1571 HCWs took part in fit testing programs. Seventy-two (4.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 within the study period. Younger age, nursing staff, close contact with a COVID-19 case, and working longer periods in wards with COVID-19 patients, were associated with COVID-19 infection. After matching for intensity of occupational exposure to infectious aerosols, close contact was the only independent variable associated with COVID-19 infection (OR 3.50, 95% CI:1.65–7.44, p = 0.001). Adequate fit test for the respirator predominately worn before the fit testing period was not associated with COVID-19 (OR 1.08, 95% CI:0.59–1.98, p = 0.815).

Conclusion

After controlling for intensity of occupational exposure to infectious aerosols, P2/N95 respirator fit testing was not associated with reduced risk of COVID-19 infection. The utility of widespread fit testing to reduce HCW COVID-19 infections should be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P2/N95 密合度测试与医护人员感染 COVID-19 的风险
背景指南建议医护人员(HCWs)对 P2/N95 呼吸器进行密合度测试,以降低感染气溶胶的风险,但很少有研究对密合度测试是否能降低 COVID-19 感染进行评估。方法在社区传播较低的时期,对澳大利亚墨尔本两家三级医疗机构的医护人员进行了回顾性队列研究。自 2020 年 9 月起,在全机构范围内开展了定量体适能测试和详细的问卷调查,以评估感染 COVID-19 的风险因素。在体征测试计划实施前(2020 年 2 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日)被确诊感染 COVID-19 的医务人员与未被确诊感染 COVID-19 的医务人员按 1:3 的比例进行配对。两组间比较了感染 COVID-19 的风险因素,包括体适能测试结果。研究期间有 72 人(4.6%)被确诊感染了 COVID-19。年龄较小、护理人员、与 COVID-19 病例密切接触以及在有 COVID-19 患者的病房工作时间较长与 COVID-19 感染有关。在对接触传染性气溶胶的职业强度进行匹配后,密切接触是唯一与 COVID-19 感染相关的自变量(OR 3.50,95% CI:1.65-7.44,p = 0.001)。结论在控制职业接触传染性气溶胶的强度后,P2/N95 呼吸器密合度测试与 COVID-19 感染风险的降低无关。应重新考虑广泛开展密合度测试对减少高危工人 COVID-19 感染的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Disease & Health
Infection Disease & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Australia's COVID-19 quarantine cohort journeys Reducing candidaemia risk in urology patients: Revised algorithm & Pharmacist-Led Implementation Designing for transparency and trust: Next steps for healthcare associated infection surveillance in Queensland The experience of infection prevention and control nurse (IPCN) in conducting post-discharge surveillance (PDS) of surgical site infections (SSI): A qualitative study From basic research to clinical practice: The impact of laminar airflow filters on surgical site infection in vascular surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1