The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.

IF 17.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychological bulletin Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1037/bul0000387
Jonas Dora, Marilyn Piccirillo, Katherine T Foster, Kelly Arbeau, Stephen Armeli, Marc Auriacombe, Bruce Bartholow, Adriene M Beltz, Shari M Blumenstock, Krysten Bold, Erin E Bonar, Abby Braitman, Ryan W Carpenter, Kasey G Creswell, Tracy De Hart, Robert D Dvorak, Noah Emery, Matthew Enkema, Catharine Fairbairn, Anne M Fairlie, Stuart G Ferguson, Teresa Freire, Fallon Goodman, Nisha Gottfredson, Max Halvorson, Maleeha Haroon, Andrea L Howard, Andrea Hussong, Kristina M Jackson, Tiffany Jenzer, Dominic P Kelly, Adam M Kuczynski, Alexis Kuerbis, Christine M Lee, Melissa Lewis, Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Andrew Littlefield, David M Lydon-Staley, Jennifer E Merrill, Robert Miranda, Cynthia Mohr, Jennifer P Read, Clarissa Richardson, Roisin O'Connor, Stephanie S O'Malley, Lauren Papp, Thomas M Piasecki, Paul Sacco, Nichole Scaglione, Fuschia Serre, Julia Shadur, Kenneth J Sher, Yuichi Shoda, Tracy L Simpson, Michele R Smith, Angela Stevens, Brittany Stevenson, Howard Tennen, Michael Todd, Hayley Treloar Padovano, Timothy Trull, Jack Waddell, Katherine Walukevich-Dienst, Katie Witkiewitz, Tyler Wray, Aidan G C Wright, Andrea M Wycoff, Kevin M King
{"title":"The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.","authors":"Jonas Dora, Marilyn Piccirillo, Katherine T Foster, Kelly Arbeau, Stephen Armeli, Marc Auriacombe, Bruce Bartholow, Adriene M Beltz, Shari M Blumenstock, Krysten Bold, Erin E Bonar, Abby Braitman, Ryan W Carpenter, Kasey G Creswell, Tracy De Hart, Robert D Dvorak, Noah Emery, Matthew Enkema, Catharine Fairbairn, Anne M Fairlie, Stuart G Ferguson, Teresa Freire, Fallon Goodman, Nisha Gottfredson, Max Halvorson, Maleeha Haroon, Andrea L Howard, Andrea Hussong, Kristina M Jackson, Tiffany Jenzer, Dominic P Kelly, Adam M Kuczynski, Alexis Kuerbis, Christine M Lee, Melissa Lewis, Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Andrew Littlefield, David M Lydon-Staley, Jennifer E Merrill, Robert Miranda, Cynthia Mohr, Jennifer P Read, Clarissa Richardson, Roisin O'Connor, Stephanie S O'Malley, Lauren Papp, Thomas M Piasecki, Paul Sacco, Nichole Scaglione, Fuschia Serre, Julia Shadur, Kenneth J Sher, Yuichi Shoda, Tracy L Simpson, Michele R Smith, Angela Stevens, Brittany Stevenson, Howard Tennen, Michael Todd, Hayley Treloar Padovano, Timothy Trull, Jack Waddell, Katherine Walukevich-Dienst, Katie Witkiewitz, Tyler Wray, Aidan G C Wright, Andrea M Wycoff, Kevin M King","doi":"10.1037/bul0000387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Influential psychological theories hypothesize that people consume alcohol in response to the experience of both negative and positive emotions. Despite two decades of daily diary and ecological momentary assessment research, it remains unclear whether people consume more alcohol on days they experience higher negative and positive affect in everyday life. In this preregistered meta-analysis, we synthesized the evidence for these daily associations between affect and alcohol use. We included individual participant data from 69 studies (<i>N</i> = 12,394), which used daily and momentary surveys to assess affect and the number of alcoholic drinks consumed. Results indicate that people are not more likely to drink on days they experience high negative affect, but are more likely to drink and drink heavily on days high in positive affect. People self-reporting a motivational tendency to drink-to-cope and drink-to-enhance consumed more alcohol, but not on days they experienced higher negative and positive affect. Results were robust across different operationalizations of affect, study designs, study populations, and individual characteristics. These findings challenge the long-held belief that people drink more alcohol following increases in negative affect. Integrating these findings under different theoretical models and limitations of this field of research, we collectively propose an agenda for future research to explore open questions surrounding affect and alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"149 1-2","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Influential psychological theories hypothesize that people consume alcohol in response to the experience of both negative and positive emotions. Despite two decades of daily diary and ecological momentary assessment research, it remains unclear whether people consume more alcohol on days they experience higher negative and positive affect in everyday life. In this preregistered meta-analysis, we synthesized the evidence for these daily associations between affect and alcohol use. We included individual participant data from 69 studies (N = 12,394), which used daily and momentary surveys to assess affect and the number of alcoholic drinks consumed. Results indicate that people are not more likely to drink on days they experience high negative affect, but are more likely to drink and drink heavily on days high in positive affect. People self-reporting a motivational tendency to drink-to-cope and drink-to-enhance consumed more alcohol, but not on days they experienced higher negative and positive affect. Results were robust across different operationalizations of affect, study designs, study populations, and individual characteristics. These findings challenge the long-held belief that people drink more alcohol following increases in negative affect. Integrating these findings under different theoretical models and limitations of this field of research, we collectively propose an agenda for future research to explore open questions surrounding affect and alcohol use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感与饮酒之间的日常关联:个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
有影响力的心理学理论假设人们饮酒是对消极和积极情绪的反应。尽管进行了20年的日常日记和生态瞬时评估研究,但仍不清楚人们在日常生活中受到更高负面和正面影响的日子是否会饮酒更多。在这项预先登记的荟萃分析中,我们综合了情感和饮酒之间日常关联的证据。我们纳入了69项研究(N=12394)的个人参与者数据,这些研究使用日常和瞬时调查来评估饮酒的影响和数量。结果表明,人们在经历高度负面情绪的日子里不太可能喝酒,但在积极情绪高涨的日子里更可能酗酒。人们自我报告有饮酒以应对和饮酒以增强的动机倾向,他们会消耗更多的酒精,但在经历更高的负面和正面影响的日子里却没有。在情感、研究设计、研究人群和个体特征的不同操作中,结果是稳健的。这些发现挑战了人们长期以来的看法,即人们在负面情绪增加后会饮酒更多。在不同的理论模型和该研究领域的局限性下整合这些发现,我们共同提出了未来研究的议程,以探索围绕情感和酒精使用的悬而未决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological bulletin
Psychological bulletin 医学-心理学
CiteScore
33.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses of research in scientific psychology. Research syntheses seek to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from many separate investigations that address related or identical hypotheses. A research synthesis typically presents the authors' assessments: -of the state of knowledge concerning the relations of interest; -of critical assessments of the strengths and weaknesses in past research; -of important issues that research has left unresolved, thereby directing future research so it can yield a maximum amount of new information.
期刊最新文献
Reporting bias, not external focus: A robust Bayesian meta-analysis and systematic review of the external focus of attention literature. Supporting the status quo is weakly associated with subjective well-being: A comparison of the palliative function of ideology across social status groups using a meta-analytic approach. When connecting with LGBTQ+ communities helps and why it does: A meta-analysis of the relationship between connectedness and health-related outcomes. Who am I? A second-order meta-analytic review of correlates of the self in childhood and adolescence. Defining social reward: A systematic review of human and animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1