Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV Research & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-07-20
Hernando Knobel, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Ana Guelar, Pablo Knobel, Judit Villar-García, Alicia González-Mena, Ceclia Canepa, Itziar Arrieta-Aldea, Augustin Marcos, Agustí Abalat-Torrres, Roberto Güerri-Fernández
{"title":"Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study.","authors":"Hernando Knobel,&nbsp;Esperanza Cañas-Ruano,&nbsp;Ana Guelar,&nbsp;Pablo Knobel,&nbsp;Judit Villar-García,&nbsp;Alicia González-Mena,&nbsp;Ceclia Canepa,&nbsp;Itziar Arrieta-Aldea,&nbsp;Augustin Marcos,&nbsp;Agustí Abalat-Torrres,&nbsp;Roberto Güerri-Fernández","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; <i>p</i> = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"2239564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH).

Methods: The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.

Results: 690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; p = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.

Conclusions: Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改用多替格拉韦/拉米夫定或比替格拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦阿拉芬胺。一个比较现实世界的研究。
背景:这项现实世界的研究比较了多替格拉韦/拉米夫定(D/L)和比替格拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦阿拉芬胺(B/F/T)转换治疗方案对HIV感染者(PLWH)的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性研究于2019年4月至2022年11月进行,纳入招募前HIV-RNA < 50拷贝/mL的PLWH,并开始D/L或B/F/T转换治疗。主要目的是评估治疗中断率;安全性和病毒学结果也进行了评估。结果:共纳入690例PLWH, D/L组358例,B/F/T组332例,中位随访时间分别为728天和1013天。D/L组停药比例为8.7%(31例,发病率为4.44 / 100 PYFU), B/F/T组为15.3%(51例,发病率为6.25 / 100 PYFU)。与D/L相比,B/F/T停药的调整风险比为1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0;p = 0.494)。D/L组和B/F/T组分别有1.1%和0.9%的患者出现病毒学失败(两次连续测量VL > 200拷贝/mL)。值得注意的是,D/L组中有1例严重不依从性和病毒学失败的患者发生了耐药性突变。结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,切换到B/T/F或D/L治疗PLWH是有效的,并且耐受性良好。两种治疗方案的停药率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A closer look: factors impacting HIV durable viral suppression among a cohort of clinic attendees in Trinidad & Tobago. Evaluation of the effect of 48 weeks of BIC/F/TAF and DRV/c/F/TAF on platelet function in the context of rapid ART start. 'It is scary to pause treatment': perspectives on HIV cure-related research and analytical treatment interruptions from women diagnosed during acute HIV in Durban, South Africa. Impacts of a multipronged initiative with community HIV clinics to support retention and re-engagement in HIV care. Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in clinical practice for people with HIV: final 24-month effectiveness and safety outcomes in key populations in the observational BICSTaR cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1