Impact of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Bundle on Delirium and Cognitive Function.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000497
Xiao-Ping Wang, Dan Lv, Yun-Fang Chen, Na Chen, Xiao-Dong Li, Cheng-Fei Xu, Yin Li, Li Tian
{"title":"Impact of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Bundle on Delirium and Cognitive Function.","authors":"Xiao-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Dan Lv,&nbsp;Yun-Fang Chen,&nbsp;Na Chen,&nbsp;Xiao-Dong Li,&nbsp;Cheng-Fei Xu,&nbsp;Yin Li,&nbsp;Li Tian","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in short-term cognitive function between mechanically ventilated patients treated with multicomponent interventions and those receiving routine nursing care have not been established because of the lack of follow-up in previous studies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the effects of the pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) care bundle on delirium occurrence and clinical outcomes, specifically in terms of short-term cognitive function, in mechanically ventilated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on 243 patients with mechanical ventilation were analyzed from January 2017 to February 2019. The eligible patients were divided randomly into two groups. The control group ( n = 120) received usual care, whereas the intervention group ( n = 123) received the PAD bundle, including pain monitoring and management, light sedation and daily awakening, early mobility, sleep promotion, and delirium monitoring. The incidence and duration of delirium, ventilator time, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were compared between the two groups. Upon discharge from the ICU and at 3 and 6 months after discharge, cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of delirium was reduced significantly in the intervention group, and significant decreases in the duration of delirium, ventilator time, and ICU length of stay were found. Cognitive impairment in the intervention group was significantly lower at the 3-month follow-up assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The PAD bundle was shown to be associated with a lower incidence of delirium and improved clinical outcomes. Short-term cognitive impairment occurred in fewer patients who were managed with the PAD bundle after ICU discharge. Our findings indicate that the PAD bundle has the potential to improve clinical outcomes. The administrative staff of ICUs should use strategies, such as interdisciplinary teamwork, to facilitate the buy-in and implementation of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"30 4","pages":"e222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Differences in short-term cognitive function between mechanically ventilated patients treated with multicomponent interventions and those receiving routine nursing care have not been established because of the lack of follow-up in previous studies.

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of the pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) care bundle on delirium occurrence and clinical outcomes, specifically in terms of short-term cognitive function, in mechanically ventilated patients.

Methods: Data on 243 patients with mechanical ventilation were analyzed from January 2017 to February 2019. The eligible patients were divided randomly into two groups. The control group ( n = 120) received usual care, whereas the intervention group ( n = 123) received the PAD bundle, including pain monitoring and management, light sedation and daily awakening, early mobility, sleep promotion, and delirium monitoring. The incidence and duration of delirium, ventilator time, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were compared between the two groups. Upon discharge from the ICU and at 3 and 6 months after discharge, cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale and compared between the two groups.

Results: The incidence of delirium was reduced significantly in the intervention group, and significant decreases in the duration of delirium, ventilator time, and ICU length of stay were found. Cognitive impairment in the intervention group was significantly lower at the 3-month follow-up assessment.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The PAD bundle was shown to be associated with a lower incidence of delirium and improved clinical outcomes. Short-term cognitive impairment occurred in fewer patients who were managed with the PAD bundle after ICU discharge. Our findings indicate that the PAD bundle has the potential to improve clinical outcomes. The administrative staff of ICUs should use strategies, such as interdisciplinary teamwork, to facilitate the buy-in and implementation of interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛、躁动和谵妄束对谵妄和认知功能的影响。
背景:由于既往研究缺乏随访,采用多组分干预措施的机械通气患者与常规护理患者短期认知功能的差异尚未确定。目的:本研究旨在评估疼痛、躁动和谵妄(PAD)护理包对机械通气患者谵妄发生和临床结果的影响,特别是在短期认知功能方面。方法:分析2017年1月至2019年2月243例机械通气患者的数据。将符合条件的患者随机分为两组。对照组(n = 120)接受常规护理,而干预组(n = 123)接受PAD捆绑治疗,包括疼痛监测和管理、轻度镇静和日常唤醒、早期活动、睡眠促进和谵妄监测。比较两组患者谵妄发生率、持续时间、呼吸机使用时间及重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。出院后及出院后3、6个月,采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表评估两组患者的认知功能,并进行比较。结果:干预组谵妄发生率明显降低,谵妄持续时间、呼吸机时间、ICU住院时间均明显缩短。在3个月的随访评估中,干预组的认知障碍明显降低。结论/实践意义:PAD束被证明与较低的谵妄发生率和改善的临床结果相关。在ICU出院后使用PAD束治疗的患者中,短期认知障碍的发生率较低。我们的研究结果表明,PAD疗法具有改善临床结果的潜力。icu的行政工作人员应使用诸如跨学科团队合作等战略,以促进采纳和执行干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1