Validation of the Nurse Managers' Work Content Questionnaire and Factors-A Structural Equation Modeling Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000526
Anu Nurmeksela, Santtu Mikkonen, Juha Kinnunen, Tarja Kvist
{"title":"Validation of the Nurse Managers' Work Content Questionnaire and Factors-A Structural Equation Modeling Study.","authors":"Anu Nurmeksela,&nbsp;Santtu Mikkonen,&nbsp;Juha Kinnunen,&nbsp;Tarja Kvist","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The responsibilities of nurse managers are diverse and occasionally inadequately organized. Moreover, the role of nurse manager often lacks a clear job description. Few methodologies for evaluating the content of nurse managers' work exist.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to validate the Nurse Managers' Work Content Questionnaire (NMWCQ) instrument and to analyze the relationships between NMWCQ factors and background variables using structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter descriptive and cross-sectional study design was used. The NMWCQ, which includes 87 items across 13 components, was developed based on a comprehensive literature review and pilot study. The questionnaire was sent to all of the nurse managers ( N = 756) employed at eight Finnish hospitals in 2019. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to psychometrically test and validate the NMWCQ, whereas Cronbach's alpha values were calculated to explore the internal consistency of the instrument. Structural equation modeling was applied to detect the relationships between the constructed factor structure and the background variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred seven nurse managers participated in this study. The final solution for the NMWCQ included 75 items across 12 factors. The NMWCQ factors were as follows: responsibility for new employees, daily management, human resource management, decision making, clinical nursing, development, planning of processes, collaboration, ensuring knowledge, evidence-based management, ensuring care quality, and financial management. The items showed factor loadings that were either positive or negative, with values ranging from .314 to .846. The Cronbach's alpha values for the factors ranged between .605 and .851. All of the covariances and relationships between background variables and factors were found to be significant ( p ≤ .05). The structural equation modeling showed acceptable index results (incremental fit index = .954, comparative fit index = .951, and root mean square error of approximation = .048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NMWCQ version assessed in this study shows a more robust structure than the previously published pilot version. Psychometric testing showed the NMWCQ as suitable for describing the diverse work requirements of nurse managers and may offer a framework for concretizing the job description of nurse managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"30 6","pages":"e245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The responsibilities of nurse managers are diverse and occasionally inadequately organized. Moreover, the role of nurse manager often lacks a clear job description. Few methodologies for evaluating the content of nurse managers' work exist.

Purpose: This study was designed to validate the Nurse Managers' Work Content Questionnaire (NMWCQ) instrument and to analyze the relationships between NMWCQ factors and background variables using structural equation modeling.

Methods: A multicenter descriptive and cross-sectional study design was used. The NMWCQ, which includes 87 items across 13 components, was developed based on a comprehensive literature review and pilot study. The questionnaire was sent to all of the nurse managers ( N = 756) employed at eight Finnish hospitals in 2019. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to psychometrically test and validate the NMWCQ, whereas Cronbach's alpha values were calculated to explore the internal consistency of the instrument. Structural equation modeling was applied to detect the relationships between the constructed factor structure and the background variables.

Results: Two hundred seven nurse managers participated in this study. The final solution for the NMWCQ included 75 items across 12 factors. The NMWCQ factors were as follows: responsibility for new employees, daily management, human resource management, decision making, clinical nursing, development, planning of processes, collaboration, ensuring knowledge, evidence-based management, ensuring care quality, and financial management. The items showed factor loadings that were either positive or negative, with values ranging from .314 to .846. The Cronbach's alpha values for the factors ranged between .605 and .851. All of the covariances and relationships between background variables and factors were found to be significant ( p ≤ .05). The structural equation modeling showed acceptable index results (incremental fit index = .954, comparative fit index = .951, and root mean square error of approximation = .048).

Conclusions: The NMWCQ version assessed in this study shows a more robust structure than the previously published pilot version. Psychometric testing showed the NMWCQ as suitable for describing the diverse work requirements of nurse managers and may offer a framework for concretizing the job description of nurse managers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士长工作内容问卷及影响因素的验证——结构方程模型研究。
背景:护士管理者的职责是多种多样的,有时组织不充分。此外,护士经理的角色往往缺乏明确的工作描述。目前很少有评价护理管理人员工作内容的方法。目的:本研究旨在验证护理管理人员工作内容问卷(NMWCQ)工具,并利用结构方程模型分析NMWCQ因素与背景变量之间的关系。方法:采用多中心描述性横断面研究设计。NMWCQ包括13个组成部分的87个项目,是在综合文献综述和试点研究的基础上制定的。该问卷被发送给2019年在芬兰8家医院工作的所有护士管理人员(N = 756)。探索性和验证性因子分析用于心理测量学测试和验证NMWCQ,而Cronbach's alpha值计算用于探索该工具的内部一致性。采用结构方程模型检测所构建的因子结构与背景变量之间的关系。结果:共有277名护理管理人员参与本研究。NMWCQ的最终解决方案包括12个因素的75个项目。NMWCQ因素包括:新员工责任、日常管理、人力资源管理、决策制定、临床护理、开发、流程规划、协作、确保知识、循证管理、确保护理质量和财务管理。因子负荷量在0.314 ~ 0.846之间,有正负荷量也有负负荷量。这些因素的克朗巴赫alpha值在0.605到0.851之间。所有的协方差和背景变量与因素之间的关系均显著(p≤0.05)。结构方程模型显示可接受的指标结果(增量拟合指数= 0.954,比较拟合指数= 0.951,近似均方根误差= 0.048)。结论:本研究评估的NMWCQ版本显示出比先前发表的试点版本更坚固的结构。心理测试表明,NMWCQ适合描述护士管理人员的不同工作要求,并可能为具体化护士管理人员的工作描述提供一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1