A death, infection, and recovery (DIR) model to forecast the COVID-19 spread

Fazila Shams , Assad Abbas , Wasiq Khan , Umar Shahbaz Khan , Raheel Nawaz
{"title":"A death, infection, and recovery (DIR) model to forecast the COVID-19 spread","authors":"Fazila Shams ,&nbsp;Assad Abbas ,&nbsp;Wasiq Khan ,&nbsp;Umar Shahbaz Khan ,&nbsp;Raheel Nawaz","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2021.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The SARS-Cov-2 virus (commonly known as COVID-19) has resulted in substantial casualties in many countries. The first case of COVID-19 was reported in China towards the end of 2019. Cases started to appear in several other countries (including Pakistan) by February 2020. To analyze the spreading pattern of the disease, several researchers used the Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model. However, the classical SIR model cannot predict the death rate.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this article, we present a Death-Infection-Recovery (DIR) model to forecast the virus spread over a window of one (minimum) to fourteen (maximum) days. Our model captures the dynamic behavior of the virus and can assist authorities in making decisions on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), like travel restrictions, lockdowns, etc.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The size of training dataset used was 134 days. The Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model was implemented using XLSTAT (add-in for Microsoft Excel), whereas the SIR and the proposed DIR model was implemented using python programming language. We compared the performance of DIR model with the SIR model and the ARIMA model by computing the Percentage Error and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Experimental results demonstrate that the maximum% error in predicting the number of deaths, infections, and recoveries for a period of fourteen days using the DIR model is only 2.33%, using ARIMA model is 10.03% and using SIR model is 53.07%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This percentage of error obtained in forecasting using DIR model is significantly less than the% error of the compared models. Moreover, the MAPE of the DIR model is sufficiently below the two compared models that indicates its effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713423/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266699002100046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The SARS-Cov-2 virus (commonly known as COVID-19) has resulted in substantial casualties in many countries. The first case of COVID-19 was reported in China towards the end of 2019. Cases started to appear in several other countries (including Pakistan) by February 2020. To analyze the spreading pattern of the disease, several researchers used the Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model. However, the classical SIR model cannot predict the death rate.

Objective

In this article, we present a Death-Infection-Recovery (DIR) model to forecast the virus spread over a window of one (minimum) to fourteen (maximum) days. Our model captures the dynamic behavior of the virus and can assist authorities in making decisions on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), like travel restrictions, lockdowns, etc.

Method

The size of training dataset used was 134 days. The Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model was implemented using XLSTAT (add-in for Microsoft Excel), whereas the SIR and the proposed DIR model was implemented using python programming language. We compared the performance of DIR model with the SIR model and the ARIMA model by computing the Percentage Error and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE).

Results

Experimental results demonstrate that the maximum% error in predicting the number of deaths, infections, and recoveries for a period of fourteen days using the DIR model is only 2.33%, using ARIMA model is 10.03% and using SIR model is 53.07%.

Conclusion

This percentage of error obtained in forecasting using DIR model is significantly less than the% error of the compared models. Moreover, the MAPE of the DIR model is sufficiently below the two compared models that indicates its effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测COVID-19传播的死亡、感染和恢复(DIR)模型
SARS-Cov-2病毒(通常称为COVID-19)在许多国家造成了大量人员伤亡。2019年底,中国报告了第一例COVID-19病例。到2020年2月,其他几个国家(包括巴基斯坦)开始出现病例。为了分析这种疾病的传播模式,一些研究人员使用了易感-感染-恢复(SIR)模型。然而,经典的SIR模型不能预测死亡率。目的在本文中,我们提出了一个死亡-感染-恢复(DIR)模型来预测病毒在1天(最少)至14天(最多)内的传播。我们的模型捕捉了病毒的动态行为,可以帮助当局制定非药物干预(NPI)决策,如旅行限制、封锁等。方法使用的训练数据集规模为134天。自动回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型使用XLSTAT (Microsoft Excel的插件)实现,而SIR和提议的DIR模型使用python编程语言实现。通过计算百分比误差和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE),比较了DIR模型与SIR模型和ARIMA模型的性能。结果DIR模型预测14天内死亡、感染和康复人数的最大%误差仅为2.33%,ARIMA模型为10.03%,SIR模型为53.07%。结论DIR模型预测的误差百分比明显小于比较模型的误差百分比。此外,DIR模型的MAPE远远低于两种比较模型,表明其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1