Vascular Repair for Iatrogenic Injury during Microsurgical Procedures: Clinical Investigation and Review of 18 Cases at a Single Institution.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2156-5586
Shigeomi Yokoya, Akihiko Hino, Hideki Oka
{"title":"Vascular Repair for Iatrogenic Injury during Microsurgical Procedures: Clinical Investigation and Review of 18 Cases at a Single Institution.","authors":"Shigeomi Yokoya, Akihiko Hino, Hideki Oka","doi":"10.1055/a-2156-5586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Intracranial vascular injury (VI) due to surgery is a critical complication that can lead to serious neurologic deficits. To our knowledge, only a few review articles on VI during an operation have been published so far. We retrospectively investigated the type, cause, and measurement of VI during surgery at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Unexpected VI cases occurred in 18 of 2,228 craniotomy procedures, including 794 aneurysm clippings and 357 tumor resections. We investigated the causes and coping techniques of the VI cases, as well as their full details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were six cases of aneurysm neck tear, one case of sylvian vein injury, and one case of superior trunk perforation during direct clipping. Regarding tumor resection procedures, nine cases of arterial injury and one case of cortical vein injury were extracted. Almost all VIs were caused by carelessness or basic manipulation mistakes. We repaired all these cases with simple placement of suture threads with or without pinch clips, flow alteration using bypass techniques, and in 16 cases no neurologic deficit or deterioration on imaging occurred; however, 3 patients were verified to have ischemic changes on postoperative imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Most VIs were directly caused by a simple error and carelessness of an operator or an assistant. Many of these injuries can be avoided if a basic set of rules are followed and remembered during the surgical procedure. However, the surgical procedure involves human work, and errors cannot be eradicated even upon maximum concentration levels. Neurosurgeons should be prepared for an eventual quick repair of an unexpected cerebral VI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2156-5586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Intracranial vascular injury (VI) due to surgery is a critical complication that can lead to serious neurologic deficits. To our knowledge, only a few review articles on VI during an operation have been published so far. We retrospectively investigated the type, cause, and measurement of VI during surgery at our institution.

Methods:  Unexpected VI cases occurred in 18 of 2,228 craniotomy procedures, including 794 aneurysm clippings and 357 tumor resections. We investigated the causes and coping techniques of the VI cases, as well as their full details.

Results:  There were six cases of aneurysm neck tear, one case of sylvian vein injury, and one case of superior trunk perforation during direct clipping. Regarding tumor resection procedures, nine cases of arterial injury and one case of cortical vein injury were extracted. Almost all VIs were caused by carelessness or basic manipulation mistakes. We repaired all these cases with simple placement of suture threads with or without pinch clips, flow alteration using bypass techniques, and in 16 cases no neurologic deficit or deterioration on imaging occurred; however, 3 patients were verified to have ischemic changes on postoperative imaging.

Conclusions:  Most VIs were directly caused by a simple error and carelessness of an operator or an assistant. Many of these injuries can be avoided if a basic set of rules are followed and remembered during the surgical procedure. However, the surgical procedure involves human work, and errors cannot be eradicated even upon maximum concentration levels. Neurosurgeons should be prepared for an eventual quick repair of an unexpected cerebral VI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显微外科手术中医源性损伤的血管修复:单一机构18例临床调查和回顾。
背景: 手术引起的颅内血管损伤(VI)是一种严重的并发症,可导致严重的神经功能缺损。据我们所知,到目前为止,只有几篇关于手术期间VI的综述文章发表。我们回顾性研究了VI的类型、原因和在我们机构手术期间的测量。方法: 2228例开颅手术中有18例发生了意外的VI病例,包括794例动脉瘤切除和357例肿瘤切除。我们调查了VI病例的原因和应对技巧,以及它们的全部细节。结果: 动脉瘤颈部撕裂6例,侧脑室静脉损伤1例,直接夹闭时上干穿孔1例。关于肿瘤切除程序,提取了9例动脉损伤和1例皮质静脉损伤。几乎所有的VI都是由疏忽或基本的操作错误引起的。我们通过简单放置缝线(带或不带夹夹)、使用旁路技术改变血流来修复所有这些病例,在16例病例中没有出现神经功能缺损或影像学恶化;然而,3名患者在术后影像学检查中证实有缺血性改变。结论: 大多数VI是由操作员或助手的简单错误和疏忽直接引起的。如果在手术过程中遵守并记住一套基本规则,许多此类损伤都可以避免。然而,外科手术需要人工操作,即使在最高浓度下也无法根除错误。神经外科医生应该为意外脑VI的最终快速修复做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
期刊最新文献
Local Prophylactic Teicoplanin Effect on Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Comparative Retrospective Study. Interleukin-6 in Spinal Cord Injury: Could Immunomodulation Replace Immunosuppression in the Management of Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries? Inside Out Cranioplasty: A Novel Technique for One-Stage Reconstruction of Persistent Scalp Necrosis. CD68 in Cerebral Aneurysms of Smokers and Nonsmokers: An Immunohistochemical Analysis. Delayed Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Mimicking Cerebral Vasospasms after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1