A review of novel Cognitive Challenge Tests for the assessment of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1037/neu0000883
Rosie E Curiel Cid, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, David A Loewenstein
{"title":"A review of novel Cognitive Challenge Tests for the assessment of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Rosie E Curiel Cid, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, David A Loewenstein","doi":"10.1037/neu0000883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is currently a lack of consensus among neuropsychologists about which cognitive assessment paradigms hold the most promise in identifying subtle cognitive deficits in preclinical Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and which are most useful for monitoring risk of cognitive deterioration. Many widely used instruments are older versions of tests originally developed for the assessment of dementia or traumatic brain injury. Current efforts to digitize these measures provides more uniform and remote assessment, which is an advancement, but does not reflect significant changes in paradigmatic underpinnings or recent advances in cognitive neuroscience.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This work provides an overview of novel Cognitive Challenge Tests (CCTs) that employ semantic interference paradigms that uniquely measure the failure to recover from proactive semantic interference (frPSI). Other salient methods to measure meaningful cognitive change in early stage AD are also presented, as well as how they compare with traditional neuropsychological assessments. Finally, future directions for the development of more effective assessment paradigms are discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>frPSI is a cognitive marker which measures the persistent inability to learn new semantically competing stimuli despite multiple opportunities to do so. frPSI and deficits in semantic inhibitory control have repeatedly shown utility for the early detection of AD during its preclinical stages. These novel cognitive markers have been related to various biomarkers of AD and neurodegeneration among culturally diverse older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To meet the critical needs of a rapidly evolving field, cognitive assessment instruments must show sufficient scientific rigor including robust sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility among culturally and linguistically diverse populations and importantly, be correlated to AD biomarkers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":"37 6","pages":"661-672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is currently a lack of consensus among neuropsychologists about which cognitive assessment paradigms hold the most promise in identifying subtle cognitive deficits in preclinical Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and which are most useful for monitoring risk of cognitive deterioration. Many widely used instruments are older versions of tests originally developed for the assessment of dementia or traumatic brain injury. Current efforts to digitize these measures provides more uniform and remote assessment, which is an advancement, but does not reflect significant changes in paradigmatic underpinnings or recent advances in cognitive neuroscience.

Method: This work provides an overview of novel Cognitive Challenge Tests (CCTs) that employ semantic interference paradigms that uniquely measure the failure to recover from proactive semantic interference (frPSI). Other salient methods to measure meaningful cognitive change in early stage AD are also presented, as well as how they compare with traditional neuropsychological assessments. Finally, future directions for the development of more effective assessment paradigms are discussed.

Results: frPSI is a cognitive marker which measures the persistent inability to learn new semantically competing stimuli despite multiple opportunities to do so. frPSI and deficits in semantic inhibitory control have repeatedly shown utility for the early detection of AD during its preclinical stages. These novel cognitive markers have been related to various biomarkers of AD and neurodegeneration among culturally diverse older adults.

Conclusions: To meet the critical needs of a rapidly evolving field, cognitive assessment instruments must show sufficient scientific rigor including robust sensitivity, specificity, and predictive utility among culturally and linguistically diverse populations and importantly, be correlated to AD biomarkers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估临床前阿尔茨海默病的新型认知挑战测试综述。
目的:目前,神经心理学家对哪些认知评估范式在识别临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)的细微认知缺陷方面最有希望,哪些对监测认知恶化风险最有用,缺乏共识。许多广泛使用的仪器都是早期版本的测试,最初是为评估痴呆症或创伤性脑损伤而开发的。目前将这些指标数字化的努力提供了更统一和远程的评估,这是一个进步,但并没有反映出范式基础的重大变化或认知神经科学的最新进展。方法:这项工作概述了新的认知挑战测试(CCTs),该测试采用语义干扰范式,独特地测量从主动语义干扰(frPSI)中恢复的失败。还介绍了测量AD早期有意义认知变化的其他显著方法,以及它们与传统神经心理学评估的比较。最后,讨论了发展更有效的评估范式的未来方向。结果:frPSI是一种认知标记,用于衡量尽管有多次机会学习新的语义竞争刺激,但仍持续无法学习。frPSI和语义抑制控制缺陷在AD临床前阶段的早期检测中一再显示出效用。这些新的认知标志物与文化多样的老年人中AD和神经退行性变的各种生物标志物有关。结论:为了满足快速发展的领域的关键需求,认知评估工具必须在文化和语言多样的人群中表现出足够的科学严谨性,包括强大的敏感性、特异性和预测效用,重要的是,必须与AD生物标志物相关联。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
期刊最新文献
Capturing cognitive capacity in the everyday environment across a continuum of cognitive decline using a smartwatch n-back task and ecological momentary assessment. Dimensional attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and executive functioning in adolescence: A multi-informant, population-based twin study. Affliction class moderates the dementing impact of adipokines. Metabolic syndrome and mobility dysfunction in older adults with and without histories of traumatic brain injury: The mediating role of cognition. Getting oriented: Redefining attention deficits in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1