Pharmacotherapy and gambling disorder: a narrative review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-09 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2229725
Rezkalla Farkouh, Sophie Audette-Chapdelaine, Magaly Brodeur
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy and gambling disorder: a narrative review.","authors":"Rezkalla Farkouh, Sophie Audette-Chapdelaine, Magaly Brodeur","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2229725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gambling disorder (GD) is a psychiatric disorder classified in the DSM-5 as a non-substance-related and addictive disorder with extensive health and socioeconomic impacts. Its chronic and high-relapsing nature makes it essential to find treatment strategies that improve functioning and reduce impairment associated with it. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy in GD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews on pharmacological interventions in patients with gambling disorder. A similar search of these databases and of Prospero, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Epistemonikos was conducted to identify clinical trials that were published since 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 1925 articles. After screening and duplicate removal, 18 articles were included in the review (11 studies were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 were reviews, and 1 was an open-label trial). Eight pharmacological agents (naltrexone, nalmefene, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, escitalopram, lithium, and topiramate<b>)</b> that were studied in randomized controlled trials and open-label trials showed small to moderate effect sizes in reducing GD symptoms in some studies during post-hoc analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall sum of evidence in the literature on the use of pharmacotherapy in GD is conflicting and inconclusive. Some studies have shown that pharmacotherapy's role in GD is promising, especially when the choice of the agent is guided by comorbid psychiatric disorders. However, significant limitations exist in the study designs, which need to be addressed in future research on the topic. Conducting future and more rigorous trials that address the limitations in the existing literature is necessary to establish more accurate efficacy data on the use of pharmacotherapy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"274-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2229725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gambling disorder (GD) is a psychiatric disorder classified in the DSM-5 as a non-substance-related and addictive disorder with extensive health and socioeconomic impacts. Its chronic and high-relapsing nature makes it essential to find treatment strategies that improve functioning and reduce impairment associated with it. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy in GD.

Methods: An electronic literature search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews on pharmacological interventions in patients with gambling disorder. A similar search of these databases and of Prospero, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Epistemonikos was conducted to identify clinical trials that were published since 2019.

Results: The initial search identified 1925 articles. After screening and duplicate removal, 18 articles were included in the review (11 studies were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 were reviews, and 1 was an open-label trial). Eight pharmacological agents (naltrexone, nalmefene, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, escitalopram, lithium, and topiramate) that were studied in randomized controlled trials and open-label trials showed small to moderate effect sizes in reducing GD symptoms in some studies during post-hoc analyses.

Conclusion: The overall sum of evidence in the literature on the use of pharmacotherapy in GD is conflicting and inconclusive. Some studies have shown that pharmacotherapy's role in GD is promising, especially when the choice of the agent is guided by comorbid psychiatric disorders. However, significant limitations exist in the study designs, which need to be addressed in future research on the topic. Conducting future and more rigorous trials that address the limitations in the existing literature is necessary to establish more accurate efficacy data on the use of pharmacotherapy in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物疗法与赌博障碍:叙述性综述。
背景:赌博障碍(GD)是一种精神障碍,在 DSM-5 中被归类为与物质无关的成瘾性障碍,对健康和社会经济有广泛影响。赌博障碍具有慢性和高复发性的特点,因此必须找到治疗策略,以改善功能并减少与之相关的损害。本叙述性综述旨在评估和总结有关药物疗法在广东的有效性和安全性的现有证据:对 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 进行了电子文献检索,以确定有关对赌博障碍患者进行药物干预的系统综述、荟萃分析和评论。还对这些数据库以及Prospero、Clinicaltrials.gov和Epistemonikos进行了类似检索,以确定自2019年以来发表的临床试验:初步检索发现了 1925 篇文章。经过筛选和删除重复文章后,18篇文章被纳入综述(11项研究为系统综述和荟萃分析,6项为综述,1项为开放标签试验)。随机对照试验和开放标签试验中研究的八种药物(纳曲酮、纳美芬、帕罗西汀、氟伏沙明、西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、锂和托吡酯)在一些研究的事后分析中显示出减少 GD 症状的小到中等程度的效果:关于药物疗法在 GD 中的应用,文献中的证据总的来说是相互矛盾和不确定的。一些研究表明,药物疗法在 GD 中的作用很有前景,尤其是在根据合并精神障碍选择药物时。然而,研究设计存在很大的局限性,需要在今后的相关研究中加以解决。今后有必要针对现有文献中存在的局限性开展更严格的试验,以便为这一人群使用药物疗法建立更准确的疗效数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
"Smoker" and "Vaper" identity in people who use both cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Changes over time and associations with smoking behaviors. Cannabis flower, concentrates, and edibles: a narrative review comparing prevalence of use, methods of consumption, and cannabis use disorder outcomes. A mixed-method exploration of #vapingcessation videos on TikTok. Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers. Co-occurring pain and addiction: prognostic implications for healthcare professionals in residential treatment for substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1