Journal of Addictive Diseases最新文献

Background: Many United States veterans utilize prescription opioids to treat chronic pain symptoms and are subsequently at risk for opioid and alcohol misuse. As more states legalized the use of cannabis for medical use, increasing numbers of people are using cannabis pharmacotherapy for pain. The veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive 1315, July 28, 2023 prohibits any medical staff on recommending, making referral to, and complete forms for a state approved program. Also, a veterans medical center does not provide marijuana to veterans. State laws do not change the status of CBD under federal law. CBD is illegal in the federal system.

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of cannabidiol product usage in Veterans and the association with changes in self-reported pain.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive survey offering questionnaires to patients greater than 18 years of age receiving care at the Fargo Veteran Health Administration medical center Pain Clinic (2101 Elm St N, Fargo ND, 58102).

Results: A total of 218 veterans participated of which 81.2% were male and 52.3% were in the age range of 60-80 years. Twenty-one participants reported cannabidiol usage (9.6%), with 52.4% using to treat pain symptoms. Average pain scores pre-usage of 6.37 were reduced to 4.05 post-usage indicating a statistically significant reduction in pain (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study broadened the baseline knowledge of cannabidiol use in the Veteran population. Limitations include results being self-reported and the inability to verify cannabinoid constituents.

Background: Patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) may develop age-related medical problems. Objective: To compare hypertension prevalence and its risk factors between two MMT clinics, having similar treatment guidelines, but different characteristics, one from Tel Aviv (TA) and one from Las Vegas (LV).

Methods: Prevalence of hypertension (systolic ≥140 and or diastolic ≥90 mmHg BP) among all current 291 MMT patients in TA and 180 patients in LV were studied, including body mass index (BMI), drugs in urine, sociodemographic, and addiction history data.

Results: Hypertension prevalence was comparable in TA (35.4%) and LV (34.4%), however TA patients were older (55.9 ± 9.5 vs. 45.5 ± 13.3, p < 0.001), with fewer females (22 vs. 42.2%, p < 0.001), fewer obese (BMI ≥30) (24 vs. 40.9%, p < 0.001), higher cocaine (21 vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001), and lower cannabis (14.1 vs. 32.4%, p < 0.001) and amphetamines (0 vs. 33.5%) users. Logistic regression found higher BMI to characterize hypertension in both clinics, but in TA also negative urine cocaine, benzodiazepine, and opioids screen, while in LV older age (≥50 y), male gender, and negative urine cannabis screen.

Conclusions: While TA was characterized with older patients, LV patients had a comparable hypertension rate, as obesity was more prevalent. No drug use was accompanied by higher BMI in TA and therefore associated with hypertension. Weight reduction, hypertension detection and treatment are recommended.

Background and objectives: There has been little research in an urban population regarding knowledge of harm reduction measures and treatment options. The objective of our study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of harm reduction measures and types of treatment available for opioid use disorder among patients and family in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room.

Methods: We conducted a single center, cross-sectional survey study that occurred between September 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sample of patients and family members that were above 18 and English speaking were recruited by research assistants. Participants were assessed on knowledge and preferences around drug treatment options and harm reduction. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U tests. p-Values were reported at the 0.05 significance level.

Results: We collected 200 responses. Of these, 104 people had a connection to someone with a substance use disorder (SUD) and 50 had an SUD. Of those who had a connection to someone with SUD, 63 had heard of naloxone (60.6%, CI: [50.5, 69.9]). Fewer than 60% of respondents in each group had heard of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) (p = 0.46) and fewer than 50% thought that among people who use drugs that they knew would be interested in receiving treatment (p = 0.10).

Discussion and conclusions: Our study found that among people who came to an urban emergency department, there was a lack of awareness of harm reduction and MOUD. Interventions should be put into place to educate on the importance of MOUD and harm reduction.

Background: Persons with substance use disorders (SUDs) have a greater risk of suicide compared with the general population. Adjustment Disorder (AD) has been under-researched in SUD populations.

Objective(s): To characterize rates, and associated features, of AD among persons with SUD for whom lethality concerns arise in a general hospital setting.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data from psychiatric consultations during a consecutive six-month period.

Results: Compared with persons with SUD classified as non-attempters, suicide attempters were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with AD. Multiple logistic regression models revealed patients with SUD referred for suicide-related concerns have an increased risk of suicide attempt if also diagnosed with AD or if they have a history of prior suicide attempt.

Conclusions: These data are in line with the contention that SUD, with comorbid AD, portend significant risk for suicide. AD represents an important disorder to recognize and target in suicide prevention strategies.

Background: Ramadan fasting, an obligatory duty for adult Muslims, entails refraining from eating, drinking, smoking, and vaping from dawn until sunset. Throughout Ramadan, people accept major changes to daily routines. Consequently, Ramadan is associated with abstinence symptoms and changes in smoking or vaping behavior.

Aim: The study aims to assess the presence of withdrawal symptoms and its severity, as well as smoking or vaping behavior change and its determinants during Ramadan fasting.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during Ramadan in 2023. Data were collected online using a Google form, including questionnaires assessing socio-demographic data, nicotine dependence using Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence, vaping and shisha smoking, presence and severity of physiological and psychological withdrawal symptoms and its coping strategies. Smoking and vaping behavioral change during Ramadan and its contributing factors were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 251 participants (96% males), mean age ± standard deviation (33 ± 12.1) were surveyed. Withdrawal symptoms were reported among 70.5%, however, their severity was generally low both physiologically and psychologically. Education, nationality, smoking duration, nicotine dependence, and the amount of consumed E-liquid per day were the independent predictors of withdrawal symptoms presence. Attempts to quit smoking and vaping were reported by 54.6% of the participants; young age and higher educational levels were the factors associated with more quitting attempts.

Conclusions: The withdrawal symptoms severity linked to Ramadan fasting is minimal. Many smokers and vapers made attempts to quit during Ramadan. Ramadan presents a chance for smoking and vaping cessation with some behavioral support.

Background: Perinatal women treated for substance use disorder (SUD) face considerable barriers to recovery that might be ameliorated through activation of community support.

Objectives: This descriptive study evaluated the presence of drug-free family and friends in the social networks of perinatal women treated for SUD. It also assessed the interest of these women to partner with network members to mobilize support across several recovery needs.

Methods: Social network interviews were conducted with 40 pre- and post-partum women treated at the Center for Addiction and Pregnancy (CAP) in Baltimore, Maryland. These interviews also prompted participants to consider which network members to invite to the program to support recovery efforts.

Results: Study participants reported that their personal social networks included 4.4 drug-free adults. An overwhelming majority (80%) of participants reported a willingness to invite at least one person to the CAP program. Participants also endorsed several opportunities for collaboration between the program and community support.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that treatment program guided activation of network support offers a testable strategy to help perinatal women reduce barriers to recovery and improve treatment outcomes.

Objectives: Recent research has focused on the effects of legalization on cannabis-related emergency department visits, but the considerable healthcare costs of cannabis-related hospitalizations merit attention. We will examine the association between recreational cannabis legalization and cannabis-related hospitalizations.

Methods: A cohort of 3,493,864 adults from Alberta was examined (October 2015-May 2021) over three periods: pre-legalization, post-legalization of flowers and herbs (phase one), and post-legalization of edibles, extracts, and topicals (phase two). Interrupted time series analyses were used to detect changes.

Results: The study found an increase in hospitalization rates among younger adults (18-24) before legalization, yet no increased risk was associated with cannabis legalization, for either younger (18-24) or older adults (25+).

Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk in younger groups and may benefit from early identification and intervention strategies, including screening and brief interventions in primary care settings.

Rationale: The opioid crisis in North America has recently seen a fourth wave, which is dominated by drug-related deaths due to the combined use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl [IMF] and stimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine.

Objectives: A systematic review addressing the question why drug users combine opioids and stimulants and why the combination results in such a high overdose mortality: from specific and dangerous pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions or from accidental poisoning?

Results: Motives for the combined use include a more intensive high or rush when used at the same time, and some users have the unfounded and dangerous belief that co-use of stimulants will counteract opioid-induced respiratory depression. Overdose deaths due to combined (intravenous) use of opioids and stimulants are not likely to be caused by specific pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between the two drugs and it is unlikely that the main cause of overdose deaths is due to accidental poisoning.

Conclusion: The unexpectedly high overdose rates in this population could not be attributed to accidental overdosing or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions. The most likely explanation for the high rate of drug-related deaths in opioid-cocaine co-users is careless overdosing with either cocaine, opioid(s) or both, probably facilitated by the high level of preexisting impulsivity in these co-users and a further acute increase in impulsivity following cocaine use. The primary corollary is that cocaine users should avoid IMF use in the same time window. In addition, IMF users should refrain from cocaine use to avoid impulsive IMF overdosing.

Background: This study pilot tested Moving On In My Recovery (MOIMR), a 12-session, acceptance-based, cognitive-behavioral, manual-guided group program for individuals in recovery from substance use. MOIMR aims to bridge the gap between formal treatment and sustained recovery. Method: Participants were 61 people in recovery from substance use and in the catchment area of the Betsi Cadwaladr Health Board, North Wales, United Kingdom. Using a variety of questionnaires, participants' psychological flexibility and wellbeing were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and a three-month follow-up. Participants who dropped out were contacted at the follow-up and interviewed about their experience. Results: The study successfully recruited participants from real-world treatment services. During the study, significant improvements were observed in participants' social functioning, experiential avoidance, recovery capital, low mood, and anxiety. The proportion of participants who achieved abstinence also improved. Qualitative feedback confirmed the benefits that participants derived from attending the MOIMR groups. Conclusion: The program offered significant benefits for the participants despite many of them having apprehensions about undertaking a group-based approach. The gains established by quantitative analysis appeared to be supported by the qualitative findings. These findings suggest that a full randomized controlled trial of MOIMR would be feasible.