Safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2023.2218188
Sahith Reddy Thotamgari, Aakash R Sheth, Harsh P Patel, Harigopal Sandhyavenu, Bhavin Patel, Udhayvir S Grewal, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan, Sourbha S Dani, Paari Dominic
{"title":"Safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Sahith Reddy Thotamgari,&nbsp;Aakash R Sheth,&nbsp;Harsh P Patel,&nbsp;Harigopal Sandhyavenu,&nbsp;Bhavin Patel,&nbsp;Udhayvir S Grewal,&nbsp;Mohammad Alfrad Nobel Bhuiyan,&nbsp;Sourbha S Dani,&nbsp;Paari Dominic","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2023.2218188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with cancer, especially breast, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary tract, and hematological malignancies. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established, safe treatment option in healthy patients; however, literature regarding safety of CA for AF in patients with cancer is limited and confined to single centers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the outcomes and peri-procedural safety of CA for AF in patients with certain types of cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NIS database was queried between 2016 and 2019 to identify primary hospitalizations with AF and CA. Hospitalizations with secondary diagnosis of atrial flutter and other arrhythmias were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between cancer and non-cancer groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During this period, 47,765 CA procedures were identified, out of which 750 (1.6%) hospitalizations had a diagnosis of cancer. After propensity matching, hospitalizations with cancer diagnosis had higher in-hospital mortality (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.2, <i>p</i> = 0.001), lower home discharge rates (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001) as well as other complications such as major bleeding (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.1-17.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but not associated with any major cardiac complications (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.8, <i>p</i> = 0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with cancer who underwent CA for AF had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and pulmonary embolism. Further larger prospective observational studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20329,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medicine","volume":"135 6","pages":"562-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2218188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with cancer, especially breast, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary tract, and hematological malignancies. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established, safe treatment option in healthy patients; however, literature regarding safety of CA for AF in patients with cancer is limited and confined to single centers.

Objective: We aimed to assess the outcomes and peri-procedural safety of CA for AF in patients with certain types of cancer.

Methods: The NIS database was queried between 2016 and 2019 to identify primary hospitalizations with AF and CA. Hospitalizations with secondary diagnosis of atrial flutter and other arrhythmias were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between cancer and non-cancer groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association.

Results: During this period, 47,765 CA procedures were identified, out of which 750 (1.6%) hospitalizations had a diagnosis of cancer. After propensity matching, hospitalizations with cancer diagnosis had higher in-hospital mortality (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.2, p = 0.001), lower home discharge rates (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9, p < 0.001) as well as other complications such as major bleeding (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7, p = 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.1-17.8, p < 0.001) but not associated with any major cardiac complications (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.8, p = 0.53).

Conclusion: Patients with cancer who underwent CA for AF had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and pulmonary embolism. Further larger prospective observational studies are needed to validate these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管消融治疗癌症患者心房颤动的安全性:一项全国性队列研究。
背景:心房颤动(AF)是癌症患者最常见的心律失常,尤其是乳腺癌、胃肠道、呼吸系统、泌尿系统和血液系统恶性肿瘤。导管消融(CA)在健康患者中是一种成熟、安全的治疗选择;然而,关于CA治疗AF癌症患者安全性的文献是有限的,并且仅限于单一中心。目的:我们旨在评估CA治疗某些类型癌症患者AF的预后和围手术期安全性。方法:查询NIS数据库,确定2016 - 2019年因房颤和房颤住院的患者,排除继发诊断为心房扑动和其他心律失常的住院患者。倾向评分匹配用于平衡癌症组和非癌症组之间的协变量。采用Logistic回归分析相关性。结果:在此期间,确定了47,765例CA手术,其中750例(1.6%)住院诊断为癌症。倾向匹配后,诊断为癌症的住院患者有较高的住院死亡率(OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.2, p = 0.001),较低的出院率(OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9, p = 0.001)和肺栓塞(OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.1-17.8, p = 0.53)。结论:因房颤而行CA的癌症患者住院死亡率、大出血和肺栓塞的几率明显更高。需要进一步更大规模的前瞻性观察研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medicine
Postgraduate Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medicine is a rapid peer-reviewed medical journal published for physicians. Tracing its roots back to 1916,  Postgraduate Medicine  was established by Charles Mayo, MD, as a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid physicians when making treatment decisions, and it maintains that aim to this day. In addition to its core subscriber base, Postgraduate Medicine is distributed to hundreds of US-based physicians within internal medicine and family practice.
期刊最新文献
An efficient approach to the inpatient Syncope Workup. Current challenges in pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infection: a case series with literature review Role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic Gallbladder cancer: surgical treatment, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy Splenectomy versus splenic preservation in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing survival benefits and short-term complications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1