Identification of Probable sarcopenia based on SARC-F and SARC-CalF in older adults from a low-resource setting.

Claudia L Vidal-Cuellar, Guiliana Mas, Pamela Ayamamani-Torres, Toshio Yazawa, Oscar Rosas-Carrasco, Tania Tello
{"title":"Identification of Probable sarcopenia based on SARC-F and SARC-CalF in older adults from a low-resource setting.","authors":"Claudia L Vidal-Cuellar,&nbsp;Guiliana Mas,&nbsp;Pamela Ayamamani-Torres,&nbsp;Toshio Yazawa,&nbsp;Oscar Rosas-Carrasco,&nbsp;Tania Tello","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-07-222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the frequency of probable sarcopenia and to compare the performance of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for detecting this condition in outpatient older adults from a low-resource setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in outpatient older adults aged ≥60 years attending a hospital in Peru, between August 2019 and February 2020. Probable sarcopenia was defined as low handgrip strength (<27 kg in men and <16 in women). We used SARC-F and SARC-CalF with their standard cut-off points (≥4 and ≥11, respectively). Low calf circumference was defined as ≤33 cm in women and ≤34 cm in men. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 206 older adults, 102 (49.5%) aged ≥75 years old and 140 (67.9%) females. Probable sarcopenia was present in 36.40% of the participants. SARC-F ≥4 was observed in 29.61% and SARC-CalF ≥11 in 41.26% of the population. SARC-F≥4 showed 41.33% sensitivity and 77.10% specificity, whereas SARC-Calf ≥11 had 50.67% sensitivity and 64.12% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that one out of three of the population had probable sarcopenia. SARC-Calf showed superior but still low sensitivity than SARC-F, while both had moderate specificity and thus may be useful for ruling out the disease in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"7 4","pages":"222-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/14/JFSF-7-222.PMC9729752.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the frequency of probable sarcopenia and to compare the performance of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for detecting this condition in outpatient older adults from a low-resource setting.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in outpatient older adults aged ≥60 years attending a hospital in Peru, between August 2019 and February 2020. Probable sarcopenia was defined as low handgrip strength (<27 kg in men and <16 in women). We used SARC-F and SARC-CalF with their standard cut-off points (≥4 and ≥11, respectively). Low calf circumference was defined as ≤33 cm in women and ≤34 cm in men. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses.

Results: We included 206 older adults, 102 (49.5%) aged ≥75 years old and 140 (67.9%) females. Probable sarcopenia was present in 36.40% of the participants. SARC-F ≥4 was observed in 29.61% and SARC-CalF ≥11 in 41.26% of the population. SARC-F≥4 showed 41.33% sensitivity and 77.10% specificity, whereas SARC-Calf ≥11 had 50.67% sensitivity and 64.12% specificity.

Conclusion: We found that one out of three of the population had probable sarcopenia. SARC-Calf showed superior but still low sensitivity than SARC-F, while both had moderate specificity and thus may be useful for ruling out the disease in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于低资源环境中老年人SARC-F和SARC-CalF的可能肌少症鉴定
目的:我们的目的是调查可能的肌肉减少症的频率,并比较SARC-F和SARC-CalF在低资源门诊老年人中检测这种疾病的性能。方法:我们对2019年8月至2020年2月在秘鲁一家医院就诊的年龄≥60岁的门诊老年人进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。可能的肌肉减少症定义为握力低(结果:我们纳入了206名老年人,102名(49.5%)≥75岁和140名(67.9%)女性。36.40%的参与者可能存在肌肉减少症。29.61%的人SARC-F≥4,41.26%的人SARC-CalF≥11。SARC-F≥4的敏感性为41.33%,特异性为77.10%,而SARC-Calf≥11的敏感性为50.67%,特异性为64.12%。结论:我们发现三分之一的人群可能患有肌肉减少症。SARC-Calf的敏感性优于SARC-F,但仍低于SARC-F,两者均具有中等特异性,因此在临床实践中可能有助于排除该疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients. Can EWGSOP2 and SDOC Definitions of Sarcopenia Identify Functional Muscle Quality? Effects of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Physical Exercise Intervention on Older Adults at Risk for Sarcopenia. Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling. Prognostic Impact of Each Item of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Urologic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1