Recreational fishing, health and well-being: findings from a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.5 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England) Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26395916.2022.2112291
Pablo Pita, Matthew O Gribble, Manel Antelo, Gillian Ainsworth, Kieran Hyder, Matilda van den Bosch, Sebastián Villasante
{"title":"Recreational fishing, health and well-being: findings from a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Pablo Pita,&nbsp;Matthew O Gribble,&nbsp;Manel Antelo,&nbsp;Gillian Ainsworth,&nbsp;Kieran Hyder,&nbsp;Matilda van den Bosch,&nbsp;Sebastián Villasante","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2022.2112291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the associations between marine recreational fishing, stress, seafood consumption, and sleep quality in a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of a convenience sample of 244 fishers recruited in 2019 in Spain. Fishers' stress levels were moderate, with a mean stress index score of 36.4 units on a scale from 14 (very low stress) to 70 (very high). Their average emotional condition was positive, with a mean index of negative affect of 7.8 units on a scale from 5 (very low negative affect) to 25 (very high). Seafood intake was low, with a mean index of seafood in diets of 38.0 units on a scale from 20 (very low seafood consumption) to 160 (very high). Fishers' perceived quality of night sleep was good because the mean index of sleep problems was 39.5 units on a scale from 21 (very low sleep problems) to 107 (very high). Each hour of self-reported monthly fishing activity was associated with 0.016 units of lower stress score. Thus, the most engaged fishers reported up to 15.4% lower stress score than less avid fishers. Since recreational fishing is a highly accessible outdoor activity for people in older age groups, it is possible that public health could be improved by access to sustainably managed recreational fisheries. Fishing engagement was positively associated with seafood intake. Each hour of fishing per month was associated with one-unit higher seafood consumption. The higher seafood consumption observed among avid recreational fishers compared with less avid fishers might have health implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72869,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","volume":"18 1","pages":"530-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762678/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2112291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We evaluated the associations between marine recreational fishing, stress, seafood consumption, and sleep quality in a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of a convenience sample of 244 fishers recruited in 2019 in Spain. Fishers' stress levels were moderate, with a mean stress index score of 36.4 units on a scale from 14 (very low stress) to 70 (very high). Their average emotional condition was positive, with a mean index of negative affect of 7.8 units on a scale from 5 (very low negative affect) to 25 (very high). Seafood intake was low, with a mean index of seafood in diets of 38.0 units on a scale from 20 (very low seafood consumption) to 160 (very high). Fishers' perceived quality of night sleep was good because the mean index of sleep problems was 39.5 units on a scale from 21 (very low sleep problems) to 107 (very high). Each hour of self-reported monthly fishing activity was associated with 0.016 units of lower stress score. Thus, the most engaged fishers reported up to 15.4% lower stress score than less avid fishers. Since recreational fishing is a highly accessible outdoor activity for people in older age groups, it is possible that public health could be improved by access to sustainably managed recreational fisheries. Fishing engagement was positively associated with seafood intake. Each hour of fishing per month was associated with one-unit higher seafood consumption. The higher seafood consumption observed among avid recreational fishers compared with less avid fishers might have health implications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
休闲钓鱼,健康和幸福:来自横断面调查的结果。
我们对2019年在西班牙招募的244名渔民的便利样本进行了横断面问卷调查,评估了海洋休闲钓鱼、压力、海鲜消费和睡眠质量之间的关系。渔民的压力水平中等,平均压力指数得分为36.4,从14(非常低的压力)到70(非常高的压力)。他们的平均情绪状态是积极的,负面情绪的平均指数为7.8个单位,从5(非常低的负面情绪)到25(非常高的负面情绪)。海鲜摄入量低,饮食中海鲜的平均指数为38.0单位(从20(非常低的海鲜摄入量)到160(非常高))。费舍尔认为夜间睡眠质量很好,因为睡眠问题的平均指数为39.5,从21(非常低的睡眠问题)到107(非常高的睡眠问题)。自我报告的每月钓鱼活动每小时与压力评分降低0.016个单位相关。因此,最积极的渔民报告的压力得分比不积极的渔民低15.4%。由于休闲垂钓对老年人来说是一项非常容易获得的户外活动,因此有可能通过获得可持续管理的休闲渔业来改善公众健康。钓鱼活动与海鲜摄入量呈正相关。每月每钓鱼一小时,海鲜消费量就会增加一个单位。与不那么热衷于钓鱼的人相比,热衷于休闲钓鱼的人对海鲜的消费更高,这可能对健康有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recreational beneficiaries and their landscape dependencies across national estuary program sites: Tillamook Bay (OR) and Tampa Bay (FL), USA. Recreational fishing, health and well-being: findings from a cross-sectional survey. A social-ecological assessment of food security and biodiversity conservation in Ethiopia. Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy. Stakeholder participation in IPBES: connecting local environmental work with global decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1