Social media voices on the treatment of skin psoriasis with biologics.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2126276
Melissa A Nickles, Roger N Haber
{"title":"Social media voices on the treatment of skin psoriasis with biologics.","authors":"Melissa A Nickles,&nbsp;Roger N Haber","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2126276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media is an outlet for patients to share medical experiences with a large audience. However, the impact of such content on individual patient treatment decisions has yet to be fully explored. We characterized patient experiences posted on social media surrounding biologic use for skin psoriasis. We analyzed content from YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok and identified patient experiences with a variety of biologics, most commonly Humira (20.7%), Cosentyx (14.0%), and Stelara (14.0%). The biologic was described as burdensome in about half of all videos/posts (46.4%), and the most commonly cited reasons included adverse effects or abnormal blood tests (12.8%), cost or insurance issues (11.7%), lack or loss of efficacy (11.7%), and pain with injection or injection site reaction (11.7%). Nevertheless, the majority (60.9%) of videos/posts reported an overall positive experience with a biologic for their skin psoriasis, which may inspire reluctant patients to try a biologic recommended by their physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":"33 8","pages":"3208-3209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2126276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social media is an outlet for patients to share medical experiences with a large audience. However, the impact of such content on individual patient treatment decisions has yet to be fully explored. We characterized patient experiences posted on social media surrounding biologic use for skin psoriasis. We analyzed content from YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok and identified patient experiences with a variety of biologics, most commonly Humira (20.7%), Cosentyx (14.0%), and Stelara (14.0%). The biologic was described as burdensome in about half of all videos/posts (46.4%), and the most commonly cited reasons included adverse effects or abnormal blood tests (12.8%), cost or insurance issues (11.7%), lack or loss of efficacy (11.7%), and pain with injection or injection site reaction (11.7%). Nevertheless, the majority (60.9%) of videos/posts reported an overall positive experience with a biologic for their skin psoriasis, which may inspire reluctant patients to try a biologic recommended by their physician.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体上关于生物制剂治疗皮肤牛皮癣的声音。
社交媒体是患者与广大受众分享医疗经验的渠道。然而,这些内容对个别患者治疗决策的影响尚未得到充分探讨。我们描述了在社交媒体上发布的有关皮肤牛皮癣生物治疗的患者体验。我们分析了来自YouTube、Instagram和TikTok的内容,并确定了患者使用各种生物制剂的经历,最常见的是Humira(20.7%)、Cosentyx(14.0%)和Stelara(14.0%)。大约一半的视频/帖子(46.4%)将生物制剂描述为负担,最常见的原因包括不良反应或血液检查异常(12.8%),成本或保险问题(11.7%),缺乏或丧失疗效(11.7%),以及注射或注射部位反应疼痛(11.7%)。然而,大多数(60.9%)的视频/帖子报告了皮肤牛皮癣生物制剂的总体积极体验,这可能会激励不情愿的患者尝试医生推荐的生物制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
期刊最新文献
Boxed warnings for dermatologic JAK inhibitors: are they standardized worldwide? A review of biosimilars in psoriasis: impacts on efficacy, safety, access, and a first-hand look at biosimilar cost savings within the department of veterans affairs Postoperative risk assessment of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and the efficacy of delayed prevention following 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized controlled study. Biodegradable polymers and platelet-rich plasma causing visual impairment: a literature review. Exploring the effect of deucravacitinib in patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1