Hydrogeological Knowledge from Below: Water Expertise as a Republican Common in Early-Modern Venice**

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1002/bewi.202200006
Pietro Daniel Omodeo
{"title":"Hydrogeological Knowledge from Below: Water Expertise as a Republican Common in Early-Modern Venice**","authors":"Pietro Daniel Omodeo","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202200006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay looks at early-modern Venice hydroculture as a case of episteme from below. The forms of water knowledge it developed were multilayered and collective in their essence and solidly rested on a social experiential basis that was rooted in labour (especially fishing) and practices (especially water surveying and engineering). In accordance with the city's republican <i>esprit </i>(and correspondent political values), its episteme emerged as the encounter and negotiation between various institutions and groups: the fishermen of San Niccolò in Venice, the practitioners of the water magistrature and political authorities. This essay explores the institutional settings of this water culture, seen as an instance of bottom-up epistemic construction. It especially addresses three historical instances: firstly, a seventeenth century program to map public waters in order to block their alienation for private fish farming; secondly, water officers’ interviews with fishermen aimed to assess the state of the lagoon hydromorphology and, thirdly, fishing regulations. Venice communitarian and circular forms of knowledge production are here contrasted to an opposite paradigm, which was embodied by the Galileian mathematician and Rome courtier, Benedetto Castelli. His interactions with the Republic of Venice on water management and his approach to hydraulic problems are revealing of an elitist and abstract understanding of scientific knowledge that guided political decisions from above without taking in any consideration the opinions of the ‘vulgar’. While his science was the expression of a top-down political epistemology, Venetian water knowledge was more egalitarian. It left room for exchange, inclusiveness and bottom-up codification; it valued the gathering of different experiences (including the fishermen's practical knowledge of their waters) and rested on a concrete and systemic (organicist) understanding of natural-anthropic processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bewi.202200006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay looks at early-modern Venice hydroculture as a case of episteme from below. The forms of water knowledge it developed were multilayered and collective in their essence and solidly rested on a social experiential basis that was rooted in labour (especially fishing) and practices (especially water surveying and engineering). In accordance with the city's republican esprit (and correspondent political values), its episteme emerged as the encounter and negotiation between various institutions and groups: the fishermen of San Niccolò in Venice, the practitioners of the water magistrature and political authorities. This essay explores the institutional settings of this water culture, seen as an instance of bottom-up epistemic construction. It especially addresses three historical instances: firstly, a seventeenth century program to map public waters in order to block their alienation for private fish farming; secondly, water officers’ interviews with fishermen aimed to assess the state of the lagoon hydromorphology and, thirdly, fishing regulations. Venice communitarian and circular forms of knowledge production are here contrasted to an opposite paradigm, which was embodied by the Galileian mathematician and Rome courtier, Benedetto Castelli. His interactions with the Republic of Venice on water management and his approach to hydraulic problems are revealing of an elitist and abstract understanding of scientific knowledge that guided political decisions from above without taking in any consideration the opinions of the ‘vulgar’. While his science was the expression of a top-down political epistemology, Venetian water knowledge was more egalitarian. It left room for exchange, inclusiveness and bottom-up codification; it valued the gathering of different experiences (including the fishermen's practical knowledge of their waters) and rested on a concrete and systemic (organicist) understanding of natural-anthropic processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自下面的水文地质知识:水专业知识作为早期现代威尼斯共和国的共同之处
这篇文章将早期现代威尼斯的水文化视为一个自下而上的知识案例。它发展的水知识形式在本质上是多层次和集体性的,并且牢固地建立在植根于劳动(特别是捕鱼)和实践(特别是水测量和工程)的社会经验基础上。根据城市的共和精神(和相应的政治价值观),它的知识出现在各种机构和团体之间的相遇和谈判中:威尼斯圣Niccolò的渔民,水上行政长官和政治当局的实践者。本文探讨了这种水文化的制度设置,被视为自下而上的认知建构的一个例子。它特别提到了三个历史实例:首先,17世纪的一项计划是绘制公共水域的地图,以防止私人养鱼场对它们的异化;其次,水务官员与渔民的访谈旨在评估泻湖水文形态的状态,第三,捕鱼法规。威尼斯的社区主义和循环形式的知识生产在这里与相反的范式形成对比,这是由伽利略数学家和罗马朝臣贝内代托·卡斯特利体现的。他与威尼斯共和国在水资源管理方面的互动,以及他对水利问题的处理方法,揭示了一种精英主义和对科学知识的抽象理解,这种理解从上面指导政治决策,而不考虑任何“庸俗”的意见。虽然他的科学是自上而下的政治认识论的表达,威尼斯人的水知识更平等。它为交流、包容和自下而上的编纂留下了空间;它重视不同经验的收集(包括渔民对其水域的实践知识),并建立在对自然-人类过程的具体和系统(有机体)理解之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Geschichte der Wissenschaften ist in erster Linie eine Geschichte der Ideen und Entdeckungen, oft genug aber auch der Moden, Irrtümer und Missverständnisse. Sie hängt eng mit der Entwicklung kultureller und zivilisatorischer Leistungen zusammen und bleibt von der politischen Geschichte keineswegs unberührt.
期刊最新文献
Western Anthelmintics in Early Twentieth-Century China Colonial Practices and Knowledge on "Tropical Diseases" of the In/between. Between Living and Non-living: Materiality of the Placenta in Ming China. Inhaltsverzeichnis: Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024 Titelbild: (Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024) Science in Community: Anatomy, Academy, and Argument in the Eighteenth-Century Holy Roman Empire**
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1