Evaluation of blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet-rich fibrin-mediated regenerative endodontic procedures in teeth with periapical pathology: a CBCT study.

Swati Markandey, Haridas Das Adhikari
{"title":"Evaluation of blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet-rich fibrin-mediated regenerative endodontic procedures in teeth with periapical pathology: a CBCT study.","authors":"Swati Markandey,&nbsp;Haridas Das Adhikari","doi":"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) using blood clots (BCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) through intraoral periapical radiography (IOPAR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five single-rooted necrotic teeth with periapical pathology were randomly allocated to receive BC, PRP, or PRF as an individual scaffold. Outcomes were evaluated in 35 teeth in 23 patients with a follow-up period of 12-24 months through qualitative IOPAR scoring and quantitative CBCT measurements. Healing of periapical lesions and in immature teeth, changes in the apical foramen diameter (AFD), root wall thickness (RWT), and root length (RL) were assessed. A <i>p</i> value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All teeth were asymptomatic except 1 in the PRP group. Periapical lesion healing was seen in all except 2 teeth in the BC group and 3 in the PRP group. Both IOPAR and CBCT revealed no significant differences in bone healing or changes in AFD, RWT, and RL among the 3 groups. A positive pulp sensibility response to the cold test was seen in 2 teeth in the BC group, but none to the electric pulp test. Intracanal calcification (ICC) was evident in more teeth in the BC group than in the PRP and PRF groups, and was also significantly higher in immature teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results revealed that BC, PRP, and PRF have similar potential as scaffolds in REPs, and ICC may be a concern for long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":"47 4","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/8d/rde-47-e41.PMC9715374.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) using blood clots (BCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) through intraoral periapical radiography (IOPAR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: Forty-five single-rooted necrotic teeth with periapical pathology were randomly allocated to receive BC, PRP, or PRF as an individual scaffold. Outcomes were evaluated in 35 teeth in 23 patients with a follow-up period of 12-24 months through qualitative IOPAR scoring and quantitative CBCT measurements. Healing of periapical lesions and in immature teeth, changes in the apical foramen diameter (AFD), root wall thickness (RWT), and root length (RL) were assessed. A p value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results: All teeth were asymptomatic except 1 in the PRP group. Periapical lesion healing was seen in all except 2 teeth in the BC group and 3 in the PRP group. Both IOPAR and CBCT revealed no significant differences in bone healing or changes in AFD, RWT, and RL among the 3 groups. A positive pulp sensibility response to the cold test was seen in 2 teeth in the BC group, but none to the electric pulp test. Intracanal calcification (ICC) was evident in more teeth in the BC group than in the PRP and PRF groups, and was also significantly higher in immature teeth.

Conclusions: Our results revealed that BC, PRP, and PRF have similar potential as scaffolds in REPs, and ICC may be a concern for long-term outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价血凝块、富血小板血浆和富血小板纤维蛋白介导的再生根管治疗在根尖周围病变的牙齿:一项CBCT研究。
目的:本研究通过口内根尖周x线摄影(IOPAR)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)比较使用血凝块(bc)、富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)进行再生牙髓治疗(REPs)的临床和放射学结果。材料和方法:45颗根尖周围病变的单根坏死牙齿随机分配接受BC、PRP或PRF作为单独的支架。通过定性IOPAR评分和定量CBCT测量对23例患者的35颗牙进行随访,随访期12-24个月。评估根尖周病变和未成熟牙的愈合情况、根尖孔直径(AFD)、根壁厚度(RWT)和根长(RL)的变化。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:PRP组除1颗牙外,其余牙均无症状。除BC组2颗牙和PRP组3颗牙外,其余牙尖周病变均愈合。IOPAR和CBCT均显示三组患者骨愈合及AFD、RWT、RL的变化无显著差异。BC组有2颗牙的牙髓敏感性对冷试验有阳性反应,但对电牙髓试验无阳性反应。与PRP和PRF组相比,BC组的牙管内钙化(ICC)明显增多,未成熟牙的ICC也明显增多。结论:我们的研究结果显示,BC、PRP和PRF作为支架在REPs中具有相似的潜力,ICC可能是长期结果的关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A 48-month clinical performance of hybrid ceramic fragment restorations manufactured in CAD/CAM in non-carious cervical lesions: case report. Assessment of mechanical allodynia in healthy teeth adjacent and contralateral to endodontically diseased teeth: a clinical study. A global overview of enamel microabrasion for white spot lesions: a bibliometric review. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability and whiteness index of single-shade resin composites after staining and bleaching. Endodontic characteristics of mandibular premolar with dens evaginatus: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1