Enhanced Accuracy in Magnetic Actuation: Closed-Loop Control of a Magnetic Agent With Low-Error Numerical Magnetic Model Estimation

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1109/LRA.2022.3191047
Onder Erin;Suraj Raval;Trevor J. Schwehr;Will Pryor;Yotam Barnoy;Adrian Bell;Xiaolong Liu;Lamar O. Mair;Irving N. Weinberg;Axel Krieger;Yancy Diaz-Mercado
{"title":"Enhanced Accuracy in Magnetic Actuation: Closed-Loop Control of a Magnetic Agent With Low-Error Numerical Magnetic Model Estimation","authors":"Onder Erin;Suraj Raval;Trevor J. Schwehr;Will Pryor;Yotam Barnoy;Adrian Bell;Xiaolong Liu;Lamar O. Mair;Irving N. Weinberg;Axel Krieger;Yancy Diaz-Mercado","doi":"10.1109/LRA.2022.3191047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic actuation holds promise for wirelessly controlling small, magnetic surgical tools and may enable the next generation of ultra minimally invasive surgical robotic systems. Precise torque and force exertion are required for safe surgical operations and accurate state control. Dipole field estimation models perform well far from electromagnets but yield large errors near coils. Thus, manipulations near coils suffer from severe (10x) field modeling errors. We experimentally quantify closed-loop magnetic agent control performance by using both a highly erroneous dipole model and a more accurate numerical magnetic model to estimate magnetic forces and torques for any given robot pose in 2D. We compare experimental measurements with estimation errors for the dipole model and our finite element analysis (FEA) based model of fields near coils. With five different paths designed for this study, we demonstrate that FEA-based magnetic field modeling reduces positioning root-mean-square (RMS) errors by 48% to 79% as compared with dipole models. Models demonstrate close agreement for magnetic field direction estimation, showing similar accuracy for orientation control. Such improved magnetic modelling is crucial for systems requiring robust estimates of magnetic forces for positioning agents, particularly in force-sensitive environments like surgical manipulation.","PeriodicalId":13241,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","volume":"7 4","pages":"9429-9436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762677/pdf/nihms-1825983.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9830824/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Magnetic actuation holds promise for wirelessly controlling small, magnetic surgical tools and may enable the next generation of ultra minimally invasive surgical robotic systems. Precise torque and force exertion are required for safe surgical operations and accurate state control. Dipole field estimation models perform well far from electromagnets but yield large errors near coils. Thus, manipulations near coils suffer from severe (10x) field modeling errors. We experimentally quantify closed-loop magnetic agent control performance by using both a highly erroneous dipole model and a more accurate numerical magnetic model to estimate magnetic forces and torques for any given robot pose in 2D. We compare experimental measurements with estimation errors for the dipole model and our finite element analysis (FEA) based model of fields near coils. With five different paths designed for this study, we demonstrate that FEA-based magnetic field modeling reduces positioning root-mean-square (RMS) errors by 48% to 79% as compared with dipole models. Models demonstrate close agreement for magnetic field direction estimation, showing similar accuracy for orientation control. Such improved magnetic modelling is crucial for systems requiring robust estimates of magnetic forces for positioning agents, particularly in force-sensitive environments like surgical manipulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁驱动精度的提高:具有低误差数值磁模型估计的磁性剂闭环控制。
磁性驱动有望无线控制小型磁性手术工具,并可能实现下一代超微创手术机器人系统。为了安全的外科手术和精确的状态控制,需要精确的扭矩和力的施加。偶极场估计模型在远离电磁铁的地方表现良好,但在线圈附近产生较大误差。因此,线圈附近的操作受到严重的(10×)场建模误差的影响。我们通过使用高度错误的偶极子模型和更准确的数值磁模型来估计2D中任何给定机器人姿态的磁力和转矩,从而通过实验量化闭环磁代理控制性能。我们将偶极子模型和基于有限元分析(FEA)的线圈附近场模型的实验测量值与估计误差进行了比较。通过为本研究设计的五种不同路径,我们证明了与偶极子模型相比,基于有限元分析的磁场建模将定位均方根(RMS)误差降低了48%至79%。模型在磁场方向估计方面表现出密切的一致性,在定向控制方面表现出类似的精度。这种改进的磁建模对于需要对定位试剂的磁力进行稳健估计的系统至关重要,特别是在手术操作等力敏感环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1428
期刊介绍: The scope of this journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles that provide a timely and concise account of innovative research ideas and application results, reporting significant theoretical findings and application case studies in areas of robotics and automation.
期刊最新文献
Integrated Grasping Controller Leveraging Optical Proximity Sensors for Simultaneous Contact, Impact Reduction, and Force Control Single-Motor-Driven (4 + 2)-Fingered Robotic Gripper Capable of Expanding the Workable Space in the Extremely Confined Environment CMGFA: A BEV Segmentation Model Based on Cross-Modal Group-Mix Attention Feature Aggregator Visual-Inertial Localization Leveraging Skylight Polarization Pattern Constraints Demonstration Data-Driven Parameter Adjustment for Trajectory Planning in Highly Constrained Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1