The status and use of prosthetic devices by persons with lower limb amputation in Rwanda.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES African Journal of Disability Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1081
Robert Ngarambe, Jean Baptiste Sagahutu, Assuman Nuhu, David K Tumusiime
{"title":"The status and use of prosthetic devices by persons with lower limb amputation in Rwanda.","authors":"Robert Ngarambe,&nbsp;Jean Baptiste Sagahutu,&nbsp;Assuman Nuhu,&nbsp;David K Tumusiime","doi":"10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amputation is one of the leading causes of disabilities because of reduced mobility. Without assistive devices specifically prostheses, the quality of life of persons with lower limb amputation (PLLA) further deteriorates. Therefore, prostheses are fundamental to improving their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to establish the number of PLLA with or without prosthesis and to determine their socio-economic profile in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in all sectors of Rwanda. As a result of coronavirus disease 2019 movement restrictions, data collection was carried out through telephone calls with participants to complete the questionnaires. Descriptive, inferential statistics and chi-square test were performed to analyse data using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 21.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3026 participants identified countrywide, 68.8% were males and 60.3% of them did not have any prosthesis (<i>p</i> = 0.003). The majority (62.4%) of those who had prosthetic devices needed repair of their prostheses while 14.8% of participants reported that their prosthetic devices were completely broken and/or damaged (<i>p</i> = 0.604). Among the participants, 63.7% had no source of income and 66.7% had dependents (<i>p ≤</i> 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of the PLLA in Rwanda did not have prosthetic devices and even those with prostheses did not fully function and thus required repair. Therefore, it adversely affects their livelihood.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The government should collaborate with stakeholders working with persons with disabilities and implement mechanisms and/or strategies to make prosthetic devices accessible and affordable.</p>","PeriodicalId":45606,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Disability","volume":"11 ","pages":"1081"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v11i0.1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amputation is one of the leading causes of disabilities because of reduced mobility. Without assistive devices specifically prostheses, the quality of life of persons with lower limb amputation (PLLA) further deteriorates. Therefore, prostheses are fundamental to improving their quality of life.

Objectives: This study aimed to establish the number of PLLA with or without prosthesis and to determine their socio-economic profile in Rwanda.

Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in all sectors of Rwanda. As a result of coronavirus disease 2019 movement restrictions, data collection was carried out through telephone calls with participants to complete the questionnaires. Descriptive, inferential statistics and chi-square test were performed to analyse data using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 21.0.

Results: Of the 3026 participants identified countrywide, 68.8% were males and 60.3% of them did not have any prosthesis (p = 0.003). The majority (62.4%) of those who had prosthetic devices needed repair of their prostheses while 14.8% of participants reported that their prosthetic devices were completely broken and/or damaged (p = 0.604). Among the participants, 63.7% had no source of income and 66.7% had dependents (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: The majority of the PLLA in Rwanda did not have prosthetic devices and even those with prostheses did not fully function and thus required repair. Therefore, it adversely affects their livelihood.

Contribution: The government should collaborate with stakeholders working with persons with disabilities and implement mechanisms and/or strategies to make prosthetic devices accessible and affordable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达下肢截肢者假肢装置的现状和使用情况。
背景:由于活动能力降低,截肢是导致残疾的主要原因之一。没有辅助装置特别是假肢,下肢截肢患者的生活质量进一步恶化。因此,义肢是提高患者生活质量的基础。目的:本研究旨在确定卢旺达带假体或不带假体的PLLA的数量,并确定其社会经济状况。方法:在卢旺达所有部门进行描述性横断面研究。由于2019冠状病毒病的行动限制,通过电话与参与者进行数据收集,以完成问卷调查。采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 21.0对数据进行描述性统计、推理统计和卡方检验。结果:在全国3026名参与者中,68.8%为男性,60.3%的人没有任何义肢(p = 0.003)。大多数(62.4%)有假体装置的人需要修复他们的假体,而14.8%的参与者报告他们的假体装置完全破裂和/或损坏(p = 0.604)。63.7%的参与者没有收入来源,66.7%的参与者有家属(p≤0.001)。结论:卢旺达大多数PLLA没有假体装置,即使有假体也不能完全发挥作用,因此需要修复。因此,这对他们的生计产生了不利影响。贡献:政府应与与残疾人合作的利益相关者合作,实施机制和/或战略,使假肢装置易于获得和负担得起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Disability
African Journal of Disability HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Disability, the official journal of CRS, AfriNEAD and CEDRES, introduce and discuss issues and experiences relating to and supporting the act of better understanding the interfaces between disability, poverty and practices of exclusion and marginalisation. Its articles yield new insight into established human development practices, evaluate new educational techniques and disability research, examine current cultural and social discrimination, and bring serious critical analysis to bear on problems shared across the African continent. Emphasis is on all aspects of disability particularity in the developing African context. This includes, amongst others: -disability studies as an emerging field of public health enquiry -rehabilitation, including vocational and community-based rehabilitation -community development and medical issues related to disability and poverty -disability-related stigma and discrimination -inclusive education -legal, policy, human rights and advocacy issues related to disability -the role of arts and media in relation to disability -disability as part of global Sustainable Development Goals transformation agendas -disability and postcolonial issues -globalisation and cultural change in relation to disability -environmental and climate-related issues linked to disability -disability, diversity and intersections of identity -disability and the promotion of human development.
期刊最新文献
Selection of a classroom observation tool for disability inclusion in Uganda. Employment challenges for persons with visual impairment in Windhoek, Namibia. Paediatric cerebral palsy in South Africa: Prevention and care gaps at hospital level. Primary healthcare rehabilitation users' views on activity limitations and participation in South Africa. Participatory research with youth with disabilities: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1