Analysis of pharmacological interventions among hospitalised patients with COVID‑19: A focus on severe cases.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomedical reports Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.3892/br.2022.1593
Yasutaka Shinoda, Kengo Ohashi, Tomoko Matsuoka, Tomoaki Yoshimura
{"title":"Analysis of pharmacological interventions among hospitalised patients with COVID‑19: A focus on severe cases.","authors":"Yasutaka Shinoda,&nbsp;Kengo Ohashi,&nbsp;Tomoko Matsuoka,&nbsp;Tomoaki Yoshimura","doi":"10.3892/br.2022.1593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing recommendations regarding pharmaceutical interventions for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) focus on outpatient, inpatient and post-discharge care. However, there are no studies examining the actual activities of pharmacists in relation to hospitalised patients. The present study aimed to identify pharmacists' roles by analysing cases of pharmaceutical interventions, particularly for patients admitted to high-care units. Pharmacological interventions were provided to patients with severe COVID-19 or patients at high risk of severe disease in 2021. These pharmaceutical interventions were analysed and evaluated. Pharmacists also developed a COVID-19 drug compatibility chart for use by care team members. In the present study, 54 patients were included, of which 33 were severe cases. A total of 28 patients (52%) received pharmacological interventions and 25 of them were severe cases. Out of 68 pharmacological interventions, interventions for antimicrobial agents were the most common (28 interventions), followed by nutrition and anti-COVID-19 drug-related interventions. In addition, the need for interventions relating to drug compatibility was reduced by ~43% after the drug compatibility chart was implemented. In conclusion, pharmacists have a responsibility to improve the quality of pharmacotherapy for patients with COVID-19. They should focus on creating specific pharmacotherapy tools for patients with COVID-19 and supporting appropriate antimicrobial use for secondary bacterial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":8863,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical reports","volume":"18 2","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764043/pdf/br-18-02-01593.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2022.1593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing recommendations regarding pharmaceutical interventions for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) focus on outpatient, inpatient and post-discharge care. However, there are no studies examining the actual activities of pharmacists in relation to hospitalised patients. The present study aimed to identify pharmacists' roles by analysing cases of pharmaceutical interventions, particularly for patients admitted to high-care units. Pharmacological interventions were provided to patients with severe COVID-19 or patients at high risk of severe disease in 2021. These pharmaceutical interventions were analysed and evaluated. Pharmacists also developed a COVID-19 drug compatibility chart for use by care team members. In the present study, 54 patients were included, of which 33 were severe cases. A total of 28 patients (52%) received pharmacological interventions and 25 of them were severe cases. Out of 68 pharmacological interventions, interventions for antimicrobial agents were the most common (28 interventions), followed by nutrition and anti-COVID-19 drug-related interventions. In addition, the need for interventions relating to drug compatibility was reduced by ~43% after the drug compatibility chart was implemented. In conclusion, pharmacists have a responsibility to improve the quality of pharmacotherapy for patients with COVID-19. They should focus on creating specific pharmacotherapy tools for patients with COVID-19 and supporting appropriate antimicrobial use for secondary bacterial infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID - 19住院患者的药物干预分析:重点关注重症病例。
关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者药物干预的现有建议侧重于门诊、住院和出院后护理。然而,没有研究调查药剂师与住院病人有关的实际活动。本研究旨在通过分析药物干预的案例来确定药剂师的角色,特别是对入住高护理单位的患者。2021年对COVID-19重症患者或重症高危患者进行药物干预。对这些药物干预措施进行了分析和评价。药剂师还制定了COVID-19药物配型表,供护理团队成员使用。本研究共纳入54例患者,其中重症33例。共有28例(52%)患者接受了药物干预,其中25例为重症。在68项药理学干预措施中,最常见的是抗菌药物干预措施(28项干预措施),其次是营养和抗covid -19药物相关干预措施。此外,实施药物配伍图后,与药物配伍有关的干预措施的需要减少了约43%。综上所述,药师有责任提高COVID-19患者的药物治疗质量。他们应侧重于为COVID-19患者创建特定的药物治疗工具,并支持对继发性细菌感染适当使用抗菌药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical reports
Biomedical reports MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Biomedical Reports is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, dedicated to publishing research across all fields of biology and medicine, including pharmacology, pathology, gene therapy, genetics, microbiology, neurosciences, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology and molecular surgery. The journal provides a home for original research, case reports and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Polychlorinated biphenyl 153 alters the intestinal epithelial cell transcriptome. Clinical application of the HALP score for predicting early neurological deterioration in older patients with acute cerebral infarction. Rabeprazole attenuates fibrosis by modulating SMAD3 linker region phosphorylation. Cardiorenal safety and efficacy of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of RCTs with 28,001 patients. ERp46 mitigates lipotoxic ER stress to preserve GLUT2 expression and insulin secretion in β-cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1