Hen-Wei Huang, David de Gruijl, Philip Fritz, Abhijay Kemkar, Ian Ballinger, George Selsing, Peter Ray Chai, Giovanni Traverso
{"title":"Encapsulation of Gas Sensors to Operate in the Gastrointestinal Tract for Continuous Monitoring.","authors":"Hen-Wei Huang, David de Gruijl, Philip Fritz, Abhijay Kemkar, Ian Ballinger, George Selsing, Peter Ray Chai, Giovanni Traverso","doi":"10.1109/sensors52175.2022.9967279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in ingestible sensors have enabled in situ detection of gastrointestinal (GI) biomarkers which shows great potential in shifting the paradigm of diagnosing GI and systemic diseases. However, the humid, acidic gastric environment is extremely harsh to electrically powered sensors, which limits their capacity for long term, continuous monitoring. Here, we propose an encapsulation approach for a gas sensor integrated into a nasogastric (NG) tube that overcomes chemical corrosion, electrical short, and mechanical collision in a gastric environment to enable continuous gaseous biomarkers monitoring. The coating effects on the sensitivity, signal latency, and repeatability are investigated. Our long-term continuous monitoring in vitro results show that the proposed coating method enables the gas sensors to function reliably and consistently in the simulated GI environment for more than 1 week. The encapsulation is composed of Polycaprolactone (PCL) to protect against mechanical scratching and Parylene C to prevent a sensor from chemical corrosion and electrical short. The average life-time of the sensor with 10 micrometers Parylene coating is about 3.6 days. Increasing the coating thickness to 20 micrometers results in 10.0 days. In terms of repeatability, 10 micrometers and 20 micrometers Parylene C coated sensors have a standard deviation of 1.30% and 2.10% for its within sensor response, and 5.19% and 3.06% between sensors respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":74503,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE Sensors. IEEE International Conference on Sensors","volume":"2022 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783471/pdf/nihms-1859504.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE Sensors. IEEE International Conference on Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sensors52175.2022.9967279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent advances in ingestible sensors have enabled in situ detection of gastrointestinal (GI) biomarkers which shows great potential in shifting the paradigm of diagnosing GI and systemic diseases. However, the humid, acidic gastric environment is extremely harsh to electrically powered sensors, which limits their capacity for long term, continuous monitoring. Here, we propose an encapsulation approach for a gas sensor integrated into a nasogastric (NG) tube that overcomes chemical corrosion, electrical short, and mechanical collision in a gastric environment to enable continuous gaseous biomarkers monitoring. The coating effects on the sensitivity, signal latency, and repeatability are investigated. Our long-term continuous monitoring in vitro results show that the proposed coating method enables the gas sensors to function reliably and consistently in the simulated GI environment for more than 1 week. The encapsulation is composed of Polycaprolactone (PCL) to protect against mechanical scratching and Parylene C to prevent a sensor from chemical corrosion and electrical short. The average life-time of the sensor with 10 micrometers Parylene coating is about 3.6 days. Increasing the coating thickness to 20 micrometers results in 10.0 days. In terms of repeatability, 10 micrometers and 20 micrometers Parylene C coated sensors have a standard deviation of 1.30% and 2.10% for its within sensor response, and 5.19% and 3.06% between sensors respectively.