Mechanical Comaneci 17-stent angioplasty for a sub-optimally deployed flow-diverter stent.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-30 DOI:10.1177/15910199221149633
Georgi Vladev, Alexander Sirakov, Kristina Sirakova, Sanimir S Sirakov
{"title":"Mechanical Comaneci 17-stent angioplasty for a sub-optimally deployed flow-diverter stent.","authors":"Georgi Vladev, Alexander Sirakov, Kristina Sirakova, Sanimir S Sirakov","doi":"10.1177/15910199221149633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flow diverter stents are increasingly used as the sole endovascular treatment method for complex or wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.<sup>1</sup> Technical complications related to stent deployment are infrequently reported in the literature. During treatment, implant misbehaviors may occur, including incomplete tubular expansion with insufficient aneurysmal coverage and wall apposition, proximal or distal narrowing, and twisting along the axis.<sup>2- 4</sup> Little is known about this phenomenon, especially if it relates to the operator experience, deployment techniques, different devices, and implant properties. The management of these complications requires technical precision and is often remediated by \"massaging\" the stent with the delivery system, balloon angioplasty, or placement of additional self-expandable stents. Lastly, if critically damaged, the stent could be taken out of the vessel with a combination of maneuvers called \"stentectomy.\"<sup>5</sup> These techniques often necessitate multiple navigations and the utilization of a larger microcatheter. We aim to highlight the feasibility of Comaneci 17 stent-angioplasty as an effective bailout strategy for inadequately deployed flow diverter stents. The suggested approach's technical aspects, including pros and cons, have been discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221149633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow diverter stents are increasingly used as the sole endovascular treatment method for complex or wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.1 Technical complications related to stent deployment are infrequently reported in the literature. During treatment, implant misbehaviors may occur, including incomplete tubular expansion with insufficient aneurysmal coverage and wall apposition, proximal or distal narrowing, and twisting along the axis.2- 4 Little is known about this phenomenon, especially if it relates to the operator experience, deployment techniques, different devices, and implant properties. The management of these complications requires technical precision and is often remediated by "massaging" the stent with the delivery system, balloon angioplasty, or placement of additional self-expandable stents. Lastly, if critically damaged, the stent could be taken out of the vessel with a combination of maneuvers called "stentectomy."5 These techniques often necessitate multiple navigations and the utilization of a larger microcatheter. We aim to highlight the feasibility of Comaneci 17 stent-angioplasty as an effective bailout strategy for inadequately deployed flow diverter stents. The suggested approach's technical aspects, including pros and cons, have been discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械式科马内奇 17 号支架血管成形术,用于治疗未达到最佳部署状态的分流支架。
分流支架越来越多地被用作治疗复杂或宽颈颅内动脉瘤的唯一血管内治疗方法。在治疗过程中,植入物可能会出现不良行为,包括管腔扩张不完全,动脉瘤覆盖和壁贴合不足,近端或远端狭窄,以及沿轴线扭曲。这些并发症的处理需要技术上的精确性,通常通过使用输送系统 "按摩 "支架、球囊血管成形术或放置额外的自膨胀支架来解决。最后,如果支架受到严重破坏,可以通过称为 "支架切除术 "5 的组合操作将支架从血管中取出。我们的目的是强调科马内奇 17 支架血管成形术的可行性,将其作为一种有效的救助策略,用于未充分展开的分流支架。我们讨论了所建议方法的技术方面,包括优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Endovascular flow diversion reconstruction of petrocervical dissections with the proximal anchoring technique: Experience in 31 consecutive cases. Flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the novel FRED X device: An early experience from a single high-volume center. Venous sinus stenting for management of spontaneous skull-base CSF leaks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: A cohort study of 325 patients. The foreseeable potential of robotics in neurointervention: Current robotic systems and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1