Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1177/15910199241308322
Dhairya A Lakhani, Aneri B Balar, Subtain Ali, Musharaf Khan, Hamza A Salim, Manisha Koneru, Sijin Wen, Richard Wang, Janet Mei, Argye E Hillis, Jeremy J Heit, Gregory W Albers, Adam A Dmytriw, Tobias D Faizy, Max Wintermark, Kambiz Nael, Ansaar T Rai, Vivek S Yedavalli
Background: Pretreatment CT perfusion (CTP) marker relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) < 42% lesion volume has recently shown to predict poor collateral status and poor 90-day functional outcome. However, there is a paucity of studies assessing its association with hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Here, we aim to assess the relationship between rCBV < 42% lesion volume with HT.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) of anterior circulation who had successful recanalization from two comprehensive stroke centers between 9/1/2017 and 10/01/2023. Successful recanalization was defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b or greater. Logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis were used to assess the relationship between rCBV <42% and HT.
Results: In total, 150 patients (median age: 69 years, 58.7% female) met our inclusion criteria. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, taking into account age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, admission National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and intravenous thrombolysis, rCBV <34% (aOR:1.01, P < .05), rCBV <38% (aOR:1.01, P < .05) and rCBV <42% (aOR:1.01, P < .05) lesion volumes were independently associated with HT. On ROC analysis rCBV < 42% (AUC = 0.61, P < .05) performed slightly better than rCBV < 38% (AUC = 0.59, P < .05) and rCBV < 34% (AUC = 0.59, P < .05) in predicting HT.
Conclusion: The rCBV <42% lesion volume is independently associated with HT in AIS-LVO patients who underwent successful recanalization.
背景:预处理CT灌注(CTP)标记相对脑血容量(rCBV)方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2017年9月1日至2023年10月1日在两个综合卒中中心成功再通的急性缺血性脑卒中前循环大血管闭塞(AIS-LVO)患者。成功再通被定义为改良治疗脑梗死(mTICI) 2b或以上。采用Logistic回归分析和ROC分析评估rCBV之间的关系。结果:总共有150例患者(中位年龄:69岁,58.7%为女性)符合我们的纳入标准。采用多变量logistic回归分析,考虑年龄、性别、高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病、卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作史、入院美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期CT评分(ASPECTS)、静脉溶栓、rCBV P P P P P P P P
{"title":"The relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) < 42% is independently associated with hemorrhagic transformation in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.","authors":"Dhairya A Lakhani, Aneri B Balar, Subtain Ali, Musharaf Khan, Hamza A Salim, Manisha Koneru, Sijin Wen, Richard Wang, Janet Mei, Argye E Hillis, Jeremy J Heit, Gregory W Albers, Adam A Dmytriw, Tobias D Faizy, Max Wintermark, Kambiz Nael, Ansaar T Rai, Vivek S Yedavalli","doi":"10.1177/15910199241308322","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241308322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pretreatment CT perfusion (CTP) marker relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) < 42% lesion volume has recently shown to predict poor collateral status and poor 90-day functional outcome. However, there is a paucity of studies assessing its association with hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Here, we aim to assess the relationship between rCBV < 42% lesion volume with HT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we included patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) of anterior circulation who had successful recanalization from two comprehensive stroke centers between 9/1/2017 and 10/01/2023. Successful recanalization was defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b or greater. Logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis were used to assess the relationship between rCBV <42% and HT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 150 patients (median age: 69 years, 58.7% female) met our inclusion criteria. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, taking into account age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, admission National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and intravenous thrombolysis, rCBV <34% (aOR:1.01, <i>P</i> < .05), rCBV <38% (aOR:1.01, <i>P</i> < .05) and rCBV <42% (aOR:1.01, <i>P</i> < .05) lesion volumes were independently associated with HT. On ROC analysis rCBV < 42% (AUC = 0.61, <i>P</i> < .05) performed slightly better than rCBV < 38% (AUC = 0.59, <i>P</i> < .05) and rCBV < 34% (AUC = 0.59, <i>P</i> < .05) in predicting HT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rCBV <42% lesion volume is independently associated with HT in AIS-LVO patients who underwent successful recanalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241308322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705296/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142948459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1177/15910199241308328
Kaustubh Limaye, Sami Al Kasab, Jaidevsinh Dolia, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Daniel Vela Duarte, Vinodh Doss, Sourabh Lahoti, David Hasan, Alejandro Spiotta, Khaled Asi, Vasu Saini, Tapan Mehta, Ameer Hassan, Diogo Haussen, Dileep Yavagal, Jesse Jones, Omar Tanweer, Waleed Brinjikji
Background and purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion up to 24 h from the last known normal time. With ADAPT and SOLUMBRA techniques, classically, a large bore aspiration catheter is delivered over a microcatheter and microwire crossing the clot to perform thrombectomy. Recently, a novel macrowire (Colossus 035 in.) has been introduced as a potential alternative to the use of microwire-microcatheter to allow the delivery of the aspiration catheter (ID = 0.070 in. up to 0.088 in.) over a macrowire alone.
Objective: To test the feasibility of delivering an aspiration catheter to clot interface over a macrowire alone.
Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively maintained Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy (MINT) Registry where this novel technique was utilized for thrombectomy. Consecutive patients undergoing MT using the MINT technique were included. We collected baseline demographics, imaging and clinical characteristics, rate of procedural success, conversion to traditional MT, and complications.
Results: Fifty consecutive patients were recruited during the initial 4 months of the larger study duration. The aspiration catheter was able to be advanced to the clot interface successfully in 46/50 (92%) using the MINT technique. Median time from vascular access to the first pass was 11.30 min (IQR = 7.45-14.30 min) and successful thrombectomy was 14 min (IQR = 10-22.15). The modified first-pass effect with this procedure was 71%. One vasospasm was reported as a procedural complication.
Conclusions: MINT is safe and feasible for large vessel occlusion recanalization based on our initial clinical experience in this multicenter study.
背景和目的:机械取栓术(MT)已成为距最后已知正常时间24小时内继发于大血管闭塞的急性缺血性卒中的标准治疗方法。采用ADAPT和SOLUMBRA技术,通常是通过微导管和微丝穿过血栓输送大口径抽吸导管来进行血栓切除术。最近,一种新型巨丝(Colossus 035 in.)被引入,作为使用微丝-微导管的潜在替代方案,允许输送抽吸导管(ID = 0.070 in.)。最大可达0.088英寸),仅通过一根宏线。目的:探讨单纯通过巨丝将导尿管送入血栓界面的可行性。材料和方法:回顾性评价前瞻性维持Macrowire颅内取栓(MINT)注册,该新技术用于取栓。使用MINT技术连续接受MT的患者被纳入。我们收集了基线人口统计学、影像学和临床特征、手术成功率、转向传统MT和并发症。结果:在较长研究时间的前4个月,连续招募了50名患者。使用MINT技术,46/50(92%)的患者能够成功地将导管推进到凝块界面。从血管进入到第一次通过的中位时间为11.30 min (IQR = 7.45-14.30 min),成功取栓时间为14 min (IQR = 10-22.15)。改良后的第一次通过效果为71%。一例血管痉挛被报道为手术并发症。结论:根据我们在这项多中心研究中的初步临床经验,MINT对于大血管闭塞再通是安全可行的。
{"title":"Macrowire for intracranial thrombectomy: An early experience of a new device and technique for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.","authors":"Kaustubh Limaye, Sami Al Kasab, Jaidevsinh Dolia, Mohamad Ezzeldin, Daniel Vela Duarte, Vinodh Doss, Sourabh Lahoti, David Hasan, Alejandro Spiotta, Khaled Asi, Vasu Saini, Tapan Mehta, Ameer Hassan, Diogo Haussen, Dileep Yavagal, Jesse Jones, Omar Tanweer, Waleed Brinjikji","doi":"10.1177/15910199241308328","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241308328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion up to 24 h from the last known normal time. With ADAPT and SOLUMBRA techniques, classically, a large bore aspiration catheter is delivered over a microcatheter and microwire crossing the clot to perform thrombectomy. Recently, a novel macrowire (Colossus 035 in.) has been introduced as a potential alternative to the use of microwire-microcatheter to allow the delivery of the aspiration catheter (ID = 0.070 in. up to 0.088 in.) over a macrowire alone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the feasibility of delivering an aspiration catheter to clot interface over a macrowire alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation of prospectively maintained Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy (MINT) Registry where this novel technique was utilized for thrombectomy. Consecutive patients undergoing MT using the MINT technique were included. We collected baseline demographics, imaging and clinical characteristics, rate of procedural success, conversion to traditional MT, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients were recruited during the initial 4 months of the larger study duration. The aspiration catheter was able to be advanced to the clot interface successfully in 46/50 (92%) using the MINT technique. Median time from vascular access to the first pass was 11.30 min (IQR = 7.45-14.30 min) and successful thrombectomy was 14 min (IQR = 10-22.15). The modified first-pass effect with this procedure was 71%. One vasospasm was reported as a procedural complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MINT is safe and feasible for large vessel occlusion recanalization based on our initial clinical experience in this multicenter study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241308328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659961/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1177/15910199241308318
Arjun B Kumar, Usama Khan, Kaustubh Limaye
Mechanical thrombectomy has become the cornerstone to achieve reperfusion in large vessel occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke. Since the advent of intracranial thrombectomy, the procedural setup has been to deliver aspiration catheter over microwire and microcatheter to the intracranial occlusion (ADAPT) or to deliver the stent-retriever through the microcatheter (SOLUMBRA) to perform thrombectomy.1 In both these techniques the quintessential aspect is crossing the clot/thrombus, which increases the chances of clot fragmentation or disruption.2 We demonstrate delivering an ultra-large bore (Sofia 0.088, Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) to the intracranial occlusion over a macrowire (Aristotle Colossus OD: 0.035' × 200 cm, Scientia Vascular, UT, USA) alone with no use of microcatheter or microwire. The utilization of macrowire to perform thrombectomy provides enough support to guide the large or ultra large bore catheter to the clot interface without the need to cross the clot. As this technique involves no crossing of clot it prevents clot disruption and distal embolization. There are other possible benefits which are under study in MINT Registry3 and include making thrombectomy more time and cost efficient.
机械取栓已成为急性缺血性脑卒中大血管闭塞后实现再灌注的基石。自颅内取栓术出现以来,程序设置一直是通过微丝和微导管将抽吸导管输送到颅内闭塞处(ADAPT)或通过微导管输送支架回收器(SOLUMBRA)进行取栓术在这两种技术中,最典型的方面都是穿过血块/血栓,这增加了血块破裂或破裂的机会我们演示了在不使用微导管或微丝的情况下,通过巨丝(Aristotle Colossus OD: 0.035' × 200 cm, Scientia Vascular, UT, USA)单独向颅内阻塞处输送超大孔径(Sofia 0.088, Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA)。利用巨丝进行取栓提供了足够的支持,引导大口径或超大口径导管到达血栓界面,而无需穿过血栓。由于该技术不涉及血栓的交叉,它可以防止血栓破裂和远端栓塞。MINT注册处正在研究其他可能的好处,包括使取栓更省时,成本更低。
{"title":"Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy: A Video Description.","authors":"Arjun B Kumar, Usama Khan, Kaustubh Limaye","doi":"10.1177/15910199241308318","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241308318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical thrombectomy has become the cornerstone to achieve reperfusion in large vessel occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke. Since the advent of intracranial thrombectomy, the procedural setup has been to deliver aspiration catheter over microwire and microcatheter to the intracranial occlusion (ADAPT) or to deliver the stent-retriever through the microcatheter (SOLUMBRA) to perform thrombectomy.<sup>1</sup> In both these techniques the quintessential aspect is crossing the clot/thrombus, which increases the chances of clot fragmentation or disruption.<sup>2</sup> We demonstrate delivering an ultra-large bore (Sofia 0.088, Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) to the intracranial occlusion over a macrowire (Aristotle Colossus OD: 0.035' × 200 cm, Scientia Vascular, UT, USA) alone with no use of microcatheter or microwire. The utilization of macrowire to perform thrombectomy provides enough support to guide the large or ultra large bore catheter to the clot interface without the need to cross the clot. As this technique involves no crossing of clot it prevents clot disruption and distal embolization. There are other possible benefits which are under study in MINT Registry<sup>3</sup> and include making thrombectomy more time and cost efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241308318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659962/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1177/15910199241305928
Ali Mortezaei, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Mahmoud Osama, Saeed Abdollahifard, Alireza Karandish, Anthony Terraciano, Adisson Fortunel, David J Altschul
Migraine is a common neurological disorder that primarily affects young adults. Despite the availability of multiple therapeutic options for patients with intractable migraine, a significant proportion of these patients remain refractory to treatment, highlighting the importance for novel therapies. In this study, we comprehensively assessed the role of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) in the management of intractable migraine. Although the exact pathophysiology of migraine remains a subject of debate, the neurovascular theory of migraine has gained attention recently following multiple studies assessing the role of the MMA in migraine pathophysiology. In addition, the successful utilization of lidocaine both through intravenous injection and directly into the MMA, as well as favorable results observed in the form of headache relief following MMA embolization (MMAE) in patients with chronic subdural hematoma, has further substantiated the neurovascular theory hypothesis. In this study, we evaluated the current evidence, potential trends, role of other injection medications, as well as risks and limitations of MMAE in the management of patients with refractory migraine. Intractable migraine is a complex condition that often requires multimodal management. MMAE has emerged as a promising, novel therapeutic technique that may help reduce pain and minimize the need for additional treatments. However, further prospective and randomized trials are still necessary for further validation.
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery embolization in migraine: From concept to reality.","authors":"Ali Mortezaei, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Mahmoud Osama, Saeed Abdollahifard, Alireza Karandish, Anthony Terraciano, Adisson Fortunel, David J Altschul","doi":"10.1177/15910199241305928","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241305928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Migraine is a common neurological disorder that primarily affects young adults. Despite the availability of multiple therapeutic options for patients with intractable migraine, a significant proportion of these patients remain refractory to treatment, highlighting the importance for novel therapies. In this study, we comprehensively assessed the role of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) in the management of intractable migraine. Although the exact pathophysiology of migraine remains a subject of debate, the neurovascular theory of migraine has gained attention recently following multiple studies assessing the role of the MMA in migraine pathophysiology. In addition, the successful utilization of lidocaine both through intravenous injection and directly into the MMA, as well as favorable results observed in the form of headache relief following MMA embolization (MMAE) in patients with chronic subdural hematoma, has further substantiated the neurovascular theory hypothesis. In this study, we evaluated the current evidence, potential trends, role of other injection medications, as well as risks and limitations of MMAE in the management of patients with refractory migraine. Intractable migraine is a complex condition that often requires multimodal management. MMAE has emerged as a promising, novel therapeutic technique that may help reduce pain and minimize the need for additional treatments. However, further prospective and randomized trials are still necessary for further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241305928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142846504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-13DOI: 10.1177/15910199241301820
Leonardo O Brenner, Milena Zadra Prestes, Cid Soares, Pedro Romeiro, Victor A Gomez, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Leonardo C Welling, Stefan W Koester, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Sávio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Daniel Dutra Cavalcanti
Background: Dissecting intracranial aneurysms (DIAs) have been treated through endovascular reconstructive manners, such as flow diverters (FDs) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Notably, no robust evidence has compared both approaches. Hence, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare their outcomes.
Methods: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies employing SAC and FD treatment for DIAs. The following outcomes were considered for extraction: procedure-related mortality, total mortality, postoperative and follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion, complications, good clinical outcomes, recurrence, and retreatment. Odds ratio (OR) with random effects was employed for statistical comparison.
Results: The meta-analysis included 10 studies. A total of 195 and 222 patients were included in the FD and the SAC group, respectively. Stent-assisted coiling had higher postoperative complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.01-0.08). Flow diverter retreatment rate was lower, but without statistical significance (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.11-1.10). No significant differences were found in follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.35-3.99); total mortality (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.09-2.08); intraoperative complications (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.06-1.45); postoperative complication (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.35-1.70); good clinical outcomes (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.43-2.20); and recurrence (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.13-1.10) between the two groups.
Conclusion: Stent-assisted coiling shows higher postoperative complete aneurysmal occlusion rates, but both techniques achieve similar rates in angiographic follow-up. Flow diverter has lower, but not statistically significant, retreatment rates than SAC. Both techniques have similar complication rates. Future randomized, multicenter, and prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more conclusive findings.
背景:解剖性颅内动脉瘤(DIAs)已通过血管内重建方式治疗,如血流分流器(FDs)和支架辅助盘绕(SAC)。值得注意的是,没有强有力的证据比较这两种方法。因此,作者进行了荟萃分析来比较他们的结果。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science中采用SAC和FD治疗DIAs的研究。提取术考虑以下结果:手术相关死亡率、总死亡率、术后和随访完全动脉瘤闭塞、并发症、良好的临床结果、复发和再治疗。采用随机效应的比值比(OR)进行统计学比较。结果:meta分析包括10项研究。FD组195例,SAC组222例。支架辅助盘绕术后动脉瘤完全闭塞率较高(OR 0.03;95% ci 0.01-0.08)。导流器再处理率较低,但无统计学意义(OR 0.35;95% ci 0.11-1.10)。随访发现完全动脉瘤闭塞无显著差异(OR 1.18;95% ci 0.35-3.99);总死亡率(OR 0.44;95% ci 0.09-2.08);术中并发症(OR 0.30;95% ci 0.06-1.45);术后并发症(OR 0.77;95% ci 0.35-1.70);临床结果良好(OR 0.97;95% ci 0.43-2.20);复发率(OR 0.38;95% CI 0.13-1.10)。结论:支架辅助卷绕术术后动脉瘤完全闭塞率较高,但在血管造影随访中,两种技术的发生率相似。导流器的再处理率低于SAC,但没有统计学意义。两种技术的并发症发生率相似。未来需要更大样本量的随机、多中心和前瞻性研究来获得更结论性的发现。
{"title":"Flow diverter versus stent-assisted coiling treatment for managing dissecting intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Leonardo O Brenner, Milena Zadra Prestes, Cid Soares, Pedro Romeiro, Victor A Gomez, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo, Leonardo C Welling, Stefan W Koester, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Sávio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Daniel Dutra Cavalcanti","doi":"10.1177/15910199241301820","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241301820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dissecting intracranial aneurysms (DIAs) have been treated through endovascular reconstructive manners, such as flow diverters (FDs) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Notably, no robust evidence has compared both approaches. Hence, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies employing SAC and FD treatment for DIAs. The following outcomes were considered for extraction: procedure-related mortality, total mortality, postoperative and follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion, complications, good clinical outcomes, recurrence, and retreatment. Odds ratio (OR) with random effects was employed for statistical comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 10 studies. A total of 195 and 222 patients were included in the FD and the SAC group, respectively. Stent-assisted coiling had higher postoperative complete aneurysm occlusion rates (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.01-0.08). Flow diverter retreatment rate was lower, but without statistical significance (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.11-1.10). No significant differences were found in follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.35-3.99); total mortality (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.09-2.08); intraoperative complications (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.06-1.45); postoperative complication (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.35-1.70); good clinical outcomes (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.43-2.20); and recurrence (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.13-1.10) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stent-assisted coiling shows higher postoperative complete aneurysmal occlusion rates, but both techniques achieve similar rates in angiographic follow-up. Flow diverter has lower, but not statistically significant, retreatment rates than SAC. Both techniques have similar complication rates. Future randomized, multicenter, and prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more conclusive findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241301820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638934/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1177/15910199241304852
Haydn Hoffman, Jason J Sims, Christopher Nickele, Violiza Inoa, Lucas Elijovich, Nitin Goyal
Introduction: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) is increasingly utilized as a primary or secondary treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) and is usually performed with liquid embolics or particles. Outcomes after MMAe with coiling as a standalone treatment, or an adjunct to other agents, have not been reviewed.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all original research that included patients who underwent standalone or adjunctive coiling for MMAe. The primary outcome was the need for rescue treatment defined as any unplanned reintervention for recurrent or residual cSDH.
Results: A total of 10 studies comprising 346 patients (mean age 73 years, 39% female) who underwent MMAe with coils were included. The majority of embolizations were with coils and particles (n = 176), followed by standalone coiling (137) and coiling with liquid embolics (120). The pooled rate of rescue treatment after embolization was 9.4% (95% CI 6.4-13.6, I2 = 0). The pooled complication rate was 2.6% (95% CI 1.3-5.1, I2 = 0). In the subgroup analysis of four studies reporting results after standalone coiling, the pooled rescue treatment rate was 8.2% (95% CI 4.0-15.9, I2 = 0) and there were no complications.
Conclusion: MMAe with coils is safe and potentially effective, but additional studies evaluating long-term clinical and radiographic results after standalone coiling are needed.
脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAe)越来越多地被用作慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)的主要或次要治疗方法,通常使用液体栓塞剂或颗粒。MMAe合并卷取作为单独治疗或辅助其他药物后的结果尚未被回顾。方法:对文献进行系统回顾,以确定所有原始研究,包括接受MMAe独立或辅助盘绕的患者。主要结局是需要抢救治疗,定义为复发性或残余cSDH的任何计划外再干预。结果:共纳入10项研究,包括346例患者(平均年龄73岁,39%为女性),他们接受了带线圈的MMAe。大多数栓塞是线圈和颗粒(n = 176),其次是单独线圈(137)和液体栓塞线圈(120)。栓塞后抢救治疗的合并率为9.4% (95% CI 6.4 ~ 13.6, I2 = 0)。合并并发症发生率为2.6% (95% CI 1.3 ~ 5.1, I2 = 0)。在4项研究的亚组分析中,报告了独立卷取后的结果,合并挽救治愈率为8.2% (95% CI 4.0-15.9, I2 = 0),无并发症发生。结论:MMAe与线圈是安全且潜在有效的,但需要进一步的研究来评估单独线圈后的长期临床和放射学结果。
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery embolization with standalone or adjunctive coiling for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haydn Hoffman, Jason J Sims, Christopher Nickele, Violiza Inoa, Lucas Elijovich, Nitin Goyal","doi":"10.1177/15910199241304852","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241304852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) is increasingly utilized as a primary or secondary treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) and is usually performed with liquid embolics or particles. Outcomes after MMAe with coiling as a standalone treatment, or an adjunct to other agents, have not been reviewed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all original research that included patients who underwent standalone or adjunctive coiling for MMAe. The primary outcome was the need for rescue treatment defined as any unplanned reintervention for recurrent or residual cSDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies comprising 346 patients (mean age 73 years, 39% female) who underwent MMAe with coils were included. The majority of embolizations were with coils and particles (<i>n</i> = 176), followed by standalone coiling (137) and coiling with liquid embolics (120). The pooled rate of rescue treatment after embolization was 9.4% (95% CI 6.4-13.6, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0). The pooled complication rate was 2.6% (95% CI 1.3-5.1, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0). In the subgroup analysis of four studies reporting results after standalone coiling, the pooled rescue treatment rate was 8.2% (95% CI 4.0-15.9, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0) and there were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMAe with coils is safe and potentially effective, but additional studies evaluating long-term clinical and radiographic results after standalone coiling are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241304852"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635794/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1177/15910199241305423
Helena Xeros, Bilal Bucak, Soliman Oushy, Giuseppe Lanzino, Zafer Keser
Background: Iatrogenic cervical artery dissection (CeAD) results from various procedures including interventional angiographic procedures and diagnostic angiography. Iatrogenic CeAD is rare, resulting in limited literature on management and outcomes. This observational cohort study investigates approaches and outcomes of iatrogenic CeAD after endovascular interventions.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review for patients who underwent endovascular intervention with resulting iatrogenic CeAD at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 1998 to 2021. Pertinent patient factors were extracted and descriptive statistics generated.
Results: Between 1998 and 2021, 21,191 patients underwent catheter-based cerebral angiography. Thirty-two had iatrogenic CeADs (23 women; median age 59 [range 40.5-92.9]). Common comorbidities included hypertension (62.5%), smoking (56.3%), and hyperlipidemia (46.9%). Nine (28.1%) had dissection with diagnostic angiograms, 6 (18.8%) endovascular thrombectomy, 15 (46.9%) intracranial aneurysm treatment/coiling, and 2 (6.3%) intracranial angioplasty with/without stenting. All dissections were diagnosed by cerebral angiography during the same session as initial interventions. Four (12.5%) underwent hyperacute stenting. Thirty (93.7%) were placed on antithrombotic therapy with aspirin alone (34.4%) or dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (37.5%). Median duration of acute treatment was three months. Follow-up imaging showed excellent radiological course.
Conclusions: Iatrogenic CeAD with endovascular interventions is rare and typically benign. Most are managed medically without complications or long-term negative outcomes. Oral single or dual-antiplatelet therapies are preferred compared to previous studies which emphasize intravenous anticoagulation. The duration of acute therapy varied from three months to lifelong. Key factors influencing clinical decision-making may include occlusion rate, pseudoaneurysm formation, intracranial extension, distal collateral circulation, and resultant ischemia.
{"title":"Iatrogenic cervical artery dissections during endovascular interventions.","authors":"Helena Xeros, Bilal Bucak, Soliman Oushy, Giuseppe Lanzino, Zafer Keser","doi":"10.1177/15910199241305423","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241305423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iatrogenic cervical artery dissection (CeAD) results from various procedures including interventional angiographic procedures and diagnostic angiography. Iatrogenic CeAD is rare, resulting in limited literature on management and outcomes. This observational cohort study investigates approaches and outcomes of iatrogenic CeAD after endovascular interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review for patients who underwent endovascular intervention with resulting iatrogenic CeAD at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 1998 to 2021. Pertinent patient factors were extracted and descriptive statistics generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1998 and 2021, 21,191 patients underwent catheter-based cerebral angiography. Thirty-two had iatrogenic CeADs (23 women; median age 59 [range 40.5-92.9]). Common comorbidities included hypertension (62.5%), smoking (56.3%), and hyperlipidemia (46.9%). Nine (28.1%) had dissection with diagnostic angiograms, 6 (18.8%) endovascular thrombectomy, 15 (46.9%) intracranial aneurysm treatment/coiling, and 2 (6.3%) intracranial angioplasty with/without stenting. All dissections were diagnosed by cerebral angiography during the same session as initial interventions. Four (12.5%) underwent hyperacute stenting. Thirty (93.7%) were placed on antithrombotic therapy with aspirin alone (34.4%) or dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (37.5%). Median duration of acute treatment was three months. Follow-up imaging showed excellent radiological course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iatrogenic CeAD with endovascular interventions is rare and typically benign. Most are managed medically without complications or long-term negative outcomes. Oral single or dual-antiplatelet therapies are preferred compared to previous studies which emphasize intravenous anticoagulation. The duration of acute therapy varied from three months to lifelong. Key factors influencing clinical decision-making may include occlusion rate, pseudoaneurysm formation, intracranial extension, distal collateral circulation, and resultant ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241305423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-08DOI: 10.1177/15910199241302123
Eleanor Taylor, Jonathan Downer, Saleh Lamin, Arun Chandran, Panayiotis Koumellis, Chee Gan, Changez Jadun, Thomas Booth, Anil Gholkar, Joe Leyon, Kyriakos Lobotesis
Background: Flow diverting stents (FDS) are an established endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms but are reported to have varying rates of adequate occlusion and thromboembolic complications. This study reports clinical safety and efficacy results of the FRED and FRED Jr FDS in clinical practice in the UK at 6 months and 1 year.
Methods: The FRED-UK study is a single arm, multicentre, prospective, observational study conducted in the UK. Safety was reviewed by evaluating morbidity (modified Rankin Score ≤2) and mortality. Efficacy was assessed as adequate occlusion of the treated aneurysm. A clinical event committee and core laboratory independently assessed clinical and anatomical results.
Results: Seven neurointerventional centers treated 61 patients, 57 of which met the full inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 75.4% were treated with FRED and 24.6% with FRED Jr. The aneurysms were located on the cavernous or supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) in 75.4%, on the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) or anterior communicating artery (Acom) in 21.1%, and on the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 3.5%. 57.9% of aneurysms were small (<10 mm), 40.4% were large (10-24 mm) and 1.8% were giant (≥25 mm). All-cause morbidity and mortality were 0% at 6 and 12 months, and adequate occlusion was 86.7% at 12 months in the per protocol population.
Conclusions: The FRED and FRED Jr devices are safe and efficacious in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
背景:血流分流支架(FDS)是一种成熟的颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗方法,但据报道有不同比例的充分闭塞和血栓栓塞并发症。本研究报告了FRED和FRED Jr FDS在英国6个月和1年临床实践中的临床安全性和有效性结果。方法:FRED-UK研究是在英国进行的一项单臂、多中心、前瞻性观察性研究。通过评估发病率(改良Rankin评分≤2)和死亡率来评估安全性。疗效评估为充分闭塞治疗的动脉瘤。临床事件委员会和核心实验室独立评估临床和解剖结果。结果:7个神经介入中心治疗了61例患者,其中57例完全符合纳入和排除标准。其中,FRED治疗占75.4%,小FRED治疗占24.6%。动脉瘤位于海绵状颈内动脉(ICA)的占75.4%,位于大脑前动脉(ACA)或前交通动脉(Acom)的占21.1%,位于大脑中动脉(MCA)的占3.5%。结论:FRED和FRED Jr装置是治疗颅内动脉瘤安全有效的方法。
{"title":"FRED-UK: Multicentre UK experience of FRED and FRED Jr flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms: 6 months and 1 year clinical and anatomical results.","authors":"Eleanor Taylor, Jonathan Downer, Saleh Lamin, Arun Chandran, Panayiotis Koumellis, Chee Gan, Changez Jadun, Thomas Booth, Anil Gholkar, Joe Leyon, Kyriakos Lobotesis","doi":"10.1177/15910199241302123","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241302123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flow diverting stents (FDS) are an established endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms but are reported to have varying rates of adequate occlusion and thromboembolic complications. This study reports clinical safety and efficacy results of the FRED and FRED Jr FDS in clinical practice in the UK at 6 months and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FRED-UK study is a single arm, multicentre, prospective, observational study conducted in the UK. Safety was reviewed by evaluating morbidity (modified Rankin Score ≤2) and mortality. Efficacy was assessed as adequate occlusion of the treated aneurysm. A clinical event committee and core laboratory independently assessed clinical and anatomical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven neurointerventional centers treated 61 patients, 57 of which met the full inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 75.4% were treated with FRED and 24.6% with FRED Jr. The aneurysms were located on the cavernous or supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) in 75.4%, on the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) or anterior communicating artery (Acom) in 21.1%, and on the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 3.5%. 57.9% of aneurysms were small (<10 mm), 40.4% were large (10-24 mm) and 1.8% were giant (≥25 mm). All-cause morbidity and mortality were 0% at 6 and 12 months, and adequate occlusion was 86.7% at 12 months in the per protocol population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FRED and FRED Jr devices are safe and efficacious in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241302123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142794680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1177/15910199241287417
Sasicha Manupipatpong, Christopher T Primiani, Kyle M Fargen, Matthew R Amans, Linda Leithe, Wouter I Schievink, Mark G Luciano, Ferdinand K Hui
Background: Spontaneous skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) are associated with increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and hypothesized to relate to skull base erosions due to increased CSF pressure. Given the increasing recognition of internal jugular venous stenosis (IJVS) as a cause of intracranial hypertension (IH), we evaluated the relationship between spinal CSFL and venous causes of IH.
Methods: The spinal CSFL database at a single institution was assessed to identify 12 consecutive spontaneous, non-traumatic spinal CSFL patients with CTV data. Exclusion criteria included documented IIH and iatrogenic CSFL. Demographics, clinical parameters, imaging characteristics, and IJV manometry results were recorded. Internal jugular venous stenosis was graded as: none (0-10%), mild (10-50%), moderate (50-80%), severe (>80-99%), and occluded (100%). Twelve consecutive patients who presented with cerebrovascular accidents without CSFL, matched by age and sex, were similarly analyzed as a control group. STROBE guidelines were used in reporting results.
Results: All CSFL patients had IJVS (83.3% bilateral, 33.3% severe) compared to 41.7% of the control group (33.3% bilateral, 16.7% severe-occluded); p = 0.04. All CSFL patients with available venogram manometry data had at least unilateral IJV gradients. Most patients presented with modified Rankin score (mRS) of 1 (66.7%), but in those with higher mRS, medical and/or surgical interventions were associated with decreased morbidity.
Conclusion: Spontaneous spinal CSFL was associated with IJVS in patients not meeting IIH criteria. Persistently high CSF pressure resulting in CSFL may cause opening pressure to be falsely normal or low. Internal jugular venous stenosis may be a viable target in recurrent CSFL management and improve morbidity.
{"title":"Jugular venous narrowing and spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: A case-control study exploring association and proposed mechanism.","authors":"Sasicha Manupipatpong, Christopher T Primiani, Kyle M Fargen, Matthew R Amans, Linda Leithe, Wouter I Schievink, Mark G Luciano, Ferdinand K Hui","doi":"10.1177/15910199241287417","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241287417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) are associated with increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and hypothesized to relate to skull base erosions due to increased CSF pressure. Given the increasing recognition of internal jugular venous stenosis (IJVS) as a cause of intracranial hypertension (IH), we evaluated the relationship between spinal CSFL and venous causes of IH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The spinal CSFL database at a single institution was assessed to identify 12 consecutive spontaneous, non-traumatic spinal CSFL patients with CTV data. Exclusion criteria included documented IIH and iatrogenic CSFL. Demographics, clinical parameters, imaging characteristics, and IJV manometry results were recorded. Internal jugular venous stenosis was graded as: none (0-10%), mild (10-50%), moderate (50-80%), severe (>80-99%), and occluded (100%). Twelve consecutive patients who presented with cerebrovascular accidents without CSFL, matched by age and sex, were similarly analyzed as a control group. STROBE guidelines were used in reporting results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All CSFL patients had IJVS (83.3% bilateral, 33.3% severe) compared to 41.7% of the control group (33.3% bilateral, 16.7% severe-occluded); <i>p</i> = 0.04. All CSFL patients with available venogram manometry data had at least unilateral IJV gradients. Most patients presented with modified Rankin score (mRS) of 1 (66.7%), but in those with higher mRS, medical and/or surgical interventions were associated with decreased morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spontaneous spinal CSFL was associated with IJVS in patients not meeting IIH criteria. Persistently high CSF pressure resulting in CSFL may cause opening pressure to be falsely normal or low. Internal jugular venous stenosis may be a viable target in recurrent CSFL management and improve morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"812-818"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559868/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1177/15910199241286009
Xin Su, Jiabin Zhu, Yuying Li, Zihao Song, Liyong Sun, Ming Ye, Tao Hong, Yongjie Ma, Hongqi Zhang, Peng Zhang
Background: The majority of studies on parasagittal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) have been limited to case reports or case series, and they are frequently reported alongside true superior sagittal sinus (SSS) DAVFs. Because of the selective bias present in the reporting of dispersed small numbers of parasagittal DAVFs, the results of each study may influence the findings. As a result, we present a large sequential cohort of parasagittal DAVFs from our institution spanning a 20-year period.
Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis involving 80 patients with parasagittal DAVFs who were hospitalized at a single medical center from 2002 to 2022. We explore their clinical manifestations, angioarchitecture, clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Results: We identified 80 patients with 85 parasagittal DAVFs. The cohort consisted of 69 men and 11 women, with a M ± SD age of 50.5 ± 11.1 years. Seventy-six patients underwent trans-arterial embolization (TAE), two underwent surgery, and two received conservative treatment. Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 74 cases (94.9%). Fifty (96.2%) patients were cured, with no recurrence detected on final follow-up imaging. One patient died 6 months after the final subtotal occlusion, while the other patients experienced improvement or resolution of clinical symptoms following treatment.
Conclusions: These lesions carry a high risk of hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits. In our series, TAE achieved a high cure rate for these lesions, with no major complications reported.
{"title":"Parasagittal dural arteriovenous fistulas.","authors":"Xin Su, Jiabin Zhu, Yuying Li, Zihao Song, Liyong Sun, Ming Ye, Tao Hong, Yongjie Ma, Hongqi Zhang, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15910199241286009","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15910199241286009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of studies on parasagittal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) have been limited to case reports or case series, and they are frequently reported alongside true superior sagittal sinus (SSS) DAVFs. Because of the selective bias present in the reporting of dispersed small numbers of parasagittal DAVFs, the results of each study may influence the findings. As a result, we present a large sequential cohort of parasagittal DAVFs from our institution spanning a 20-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis involving 80 patients with parasagittal DAVFs who were hospitalized at a single medical center from 2002 to 2022. We explore their clinical manifestations, angioarchitecture, clinical and radiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 80 patients with 85 parasagittal DAVFs. The cohort consisted of 69 men and 11 women, with a M ± SD age of 50.5 ± 11.1 years. Seventy-six patients underwent trans-arterial embolization (TAE), two underwent surgery, and two received conservative treatment. Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 74 cases (94.9%). Fifty (96.2%) patients were cured, with no recurrence detected on final follow-up imaging. One patient died 6 months after the final subtotal occlusion, while the other patients experienced improvement or resolution of clinical symptoms following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These lesions carry a high risk of hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits. In our series, TAE achieved a high cure rate for these lesions, with no major complications reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"839-845"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559956/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142287260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}