Therapies in Autoimmune Peripheral Neuropathies beyond Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Plasma Exchange and Corticosteroids: An Analytical Review

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.05.002
Ajith Sivadasan, Vera Bril
{"title":"Therapies in Autoimmune Peripheral Neuropathies beyond Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Plasma Exchange and Corticosteroids: An Analytical Review","authors":"Ajith Sivadasan,&nbsp;Vera Bril","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autoimmune neuropathies<span><span> are often treatable. First-line immunotherapies<span> include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange<span> and corticosteroids. However, nearly 15-30% of patients are either refractory, partially responsive or chronically dependent on these first-line agents. Lack of full response leads to increased disability in addition to adverse financial implications. Consequently, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments to manage this subset of patients. There has been a remarkable increase in the knowledge about </span></span></span>immunopathogenesis<span><span>, antigenic targets, clinical phenotype correlation, and novel therapeutic agents in the last two decades. These novel agents target specific components of the immune system (humoral, </span>cellular immunity<span>, and complement) and have the potential to improve the management of these disorders. Unfortunately, high-quality evidence from large, controlled studies is scarce considering the relative rarity of these refractory cases, heterogeneity of clinical presentations and ethical concerns limiting the use of a placebo arm. An adaptive clinical trial design in a homogenous cohort with standardized outcomes in multiple centers and the use of historical controls will likely provide valuable scientific evidence about the efficacy and safety of these therapies. In this review, we examine the status of the newer immunotherapies in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies based on existing data.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 4","pages":"Pages 220-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796322000359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Autoimmune neuropathies are often treatable. First-line immunotherapies include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange and corticosteroids. However, nearly 15-30% of patients are either refractory, partially responsive or chronically dependent on these first-line agents. Lack of full response leads to increased disability in addition to adverse financial implications. Consequently, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments to manage this subset of patients. There has been a remarkable increase in the knowledge about immunopathogenesis, antigenic targets, clinical phenotype correlation, and novel therapeutic agents in the last two decades. These novel agents target specific components of the immune system (humoral, cellular immunity, and complement) and have the potential to improve the management of these disorders. Unfortunately, high-quality evidence from large, controlled studies is scarce considering the relative rarity of these refractory cases, heterogeneity of clinical presentations and ethical concerns limiting the use of a placebo arm. An adaptive clinical trial design in a homogenous cohort with standardized outcomes in multiple centers and the use of historical controls will likely provide valuable scientific evidence about the efficacy and safety of these therapies. In this review, we examine the status of the newer immunotherapies in the treatment of autoimmune neuropathies based on existing data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除静脉注射免疫球蛋白、血浆置换和皮质类固醇外,自身免疫性周围神经病变的治疗:分析回顾
自身免疫性神经病变通常是可以治疗的。一线免疫治疗包括静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)、血浆置换和皮质类固醇。然而,近15-30%的患者要么难治性,要么部分反应性,要么长期依赖这些一线药物。除了不利的财政影响外,缺乏充分的应对措施还导致残疾增加。因此,需要更有效的治疗方法来管理这部分患者。近二十年来,人们对免疫发病机制、抗原靶点、临床表型相关性和新型治疗药物的认识有了显著的提高。这些新型药物针对免疫系统的特定成分(体液、细胞免疫和补体),并具有改善这些疾病管理的潜力。不幸的是,考虑到这些难治性病例的相对罕见性、临床表现的异质性以及限制安慰剂组使用的伦理问题,来自大型对照研究的高质量证据很少。在多中心的标准化结果的同质队列中进行适应性临床试验设计,并使用历史对照,可能会为这些疗法的有效性和安全性提供有价值的科学证据。在这篇综述中,我们根据现有数据研究了新的免疫疗法在自身免疫性神经病变治疗中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
期刊最新文献
Single vs Double-Unit Transfusion in Patients With Hematological Disorders Undergoing Chemotherapy or Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Whole Blood Donor Iron Management Across Europe: Experiences and Challenges in Four Blood Establishments Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse Ultra-Massive Transfusion: Predictors of Occurrence and In-Hospital mortality From the Australian and New Zealand Massive Transfusion Registry (ANZ-MTR) Beta-Amyloid Related Neurodegenerative and Neurovascular Diseases: Potential Implications for Transfusion Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1