Afrique ou Asie, quelle est lˈorigine évolutive des schistosomes humains ?

Guangjun Zhang , Olivier Verneau , Chiping Qiu , Joseph Jourdane , Mingyi Xia
{"title":"Afrique ou Asie, quelle est lˈorigine évolutive des schistosomes humains ?","authors":"Guangjun Zhang ,&nbsp;Olivier Verneau ,&nbsp;Chiping Qiu ,&nbsp;Joseph Jourdane ,&nbsp;Mingyi Xia","doi":"10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus <em>Schistosoma</em>, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (<em>mansoni, haematobium, indicum</em> and <em>japonicum</em> lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including <em>mansoni</em> and <em>haematobium</em> lineages) appears very divergent from the <em>japonicum</em> lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including <em>Orientobilharzia turkestanicum</em> from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among <em>Schistosoma</em> species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the <em>Schistosoma</em> genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of <em>O. turkestanicum</em> originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that <em>Schistosoma</em> is not monophyletic. However, <em>O. turkestanicum</em>, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the <em>japonicum</em> group to the exclusion of African <em>Schistosoma</em> species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitly concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus <em>Schistosoma</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100306,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","volume":"324 11","pages":"Pages 1001-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S076444690101383X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus Schistosoma, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (mansoni, haematobium, indicum and japonicum lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including mansoni and haematobium lineages) appears very divergent from the japonicum lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including Orientobilharzia turkestanicum from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among Schistosoma species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the Schistosoma genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of O. turkestanicum originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that Schistosoma is not monophyletic. However, O. turkestanicum, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the japonicum group to the exclusion of African Schistosoma species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitly concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus Schistosoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲或亚洲,lˈschistosomes人类进化的起源是什么?
由于具有重要的医学意义(是仅次于疟疾的第二大人类寄生虫病的原因),血吸虫科物种的起源和进化引起了极大的兴趣。使用几种分子标记的系统发育研究的结合为传统的分组和进化推断提供了支持,这些推断来自形态学和生物学数据。血吸虫属包括所有寄生于人类的种类,一般分为四个进化谱系(曼氏、血血吸虫、籼稻血吸虫和日本血吸虫)。非洲血吸虫群(包括曼氏血吸虫和嗜血血吸虫谱系)与日本血吸虫谱系有很大的差异。最近的系统发育研究使用部分28S rDNA测序,包括来自伊朗的土耳其东方血吸虫(一种亚洲家畜寄生虫),意外地发现,该物种在血吸虫物种中嵌套,从而使后者具有副葡萄性,并提出了血吸虫属的亚洲起源。本研究通过分析一个新的基因组标记(ITS2),并包括对原来自中国东北的土耳其血吸虫的使用,重新审视了人类血吸虫的地理起源问题。我们的结果与先前使用28S的工作一致,表明血吸虫不是单系的。然而,无论采用何种分析方法(距离或简约),土耳其血吸虫都被归为日本血吸虫类群的成员,而不包括非洲血吸虫种。因此,我们的数据强烈表明,在确定血吸虫属的亚洲或非洲起源之前,需要进一步的系统发育研究,包括新的分类群和新的基因组序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Le risque accidentel du piéton dans agglomération parisienne Differences in the social context of song production in captive male and female European starlings Environment, genome and cancer Genomics and early cellular evolution. The origin of the DNA world Valeur prédictive des types biologiques pour la conservation de la flore méditerranéenne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1