Dosimetric impact of tumor position displacements between photon and proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Liu Chieh-Wen, Ma Tianjun, Gray Tara, Ahmed Saeed, Yu Naichang, Stephans Kevin L, Videtic Gregory M M, Xia Ping
{"title":"Dosimetric impact of tumor position displacements between photon and proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.","authors":"Liu Chieh-Wen,&nbsp;Ma Tianjun,&nbsp;Gray Tara,&nbsp;Ahmed Saeed,&nbsp;Yu Naichang,&nbsp;Stephans Kevin L,&nbsp;Videtic Gregory M M,&nbsp;Xia Ping","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of tumor position displacements (TPDs) on tumor dose coverage in photon and proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments for lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From our institutional database of 2877 fractions from 770 lung cancer patients treated with photon SBRT in 2017-2021, 163 fractions from 88 patients with recorded iso-center shifts of >1.5 cm in any direction under kV-cone-beam CT guidance were identified. By double registrations with bony and tumor alignments, the difference between the iso-center shifts of these two alignments was categorized as TPDs. One fraction from each of 15 patients who had TPD magnitudes >3 mm were selected for this study. For each patient, one proton plan using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with robust optimization was generated retrospectively. All photon plans had V<sub>100%RX</sub>>99% of GTVs and V<sub>100%RX</sub>>98% of ITVs. Proton plans were evaluated with two worse-case scenario (voxelwise worst and worst scenario) using 5mm and 3.5% uncertainty to achieve the same planning goals as the corresponding photon plans. These two evaluation proton plans were named proton-1st and proton-2nd plans. The dosimetric effect of TPD was simulated by shifting tumor contours with the corresponding shift on patient specific planning CT and by recalculating the dose of the original plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range of magnitude of TPDs was 3.58-28.71 mm. In photon plans, TPDs did not impact tumor dose coverage, still achieving V<sub>100%RX</sub> of the GTV≥99% and V<sub>100%RX</sub> of the ITV≥98%. In proton plans for patients with TPDs>10 mm, inadequate target dose coverage was observed. More specifically, 8 fractions of proton-1st plans and 4 fractions of proton-2nd had V<sub>100%RX</sub> of the GTV<99% and V<sub>100%RX</sub> of the ITV<98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adequate tumor dose coverage was achieved in photon SBRT for magnitude of TPDs up to 20 mm. TPDs had greater impact in proton SBRT and adaptive planning was needed when the magnitude of TPDs>10 mm to provide adequate tumor dose coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 2","pages":"137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489077/pdf/rsbrt-8-137.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of tumor position displacements (TPDs) on tumor dose coverage in photon and proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments for lung cancer patients.

Methods: From our institutional database of 2877 fractions from 770 lung cancer patients treated with photon SBRT in 2017-2021, 163 fractions from 88 patients with recorded iso-center shifts of >1.5 cm in any direction under kV-cone-beam CT guidance were identified. By double registrations with bony and tumor alignments, the difference between the iso-center shifts of these two alignments was categorized as TPDs. One fraction from each of 15 patients who had TPD magnitudes >3 mm were selected for this study. For each patient, one proton plan using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with robust optimization was generated retrospectively. All photon plans had V100%RX>99% of GTVs and V100%RX>98% of ITVs. Proton plans were evaluated with two worse-case scenario (voxelwise worst and worst scenario) using 5mm and 3.5% uncertainty to achieve the same planning goals as the corresponding photon plans. These two evaluation proton plans were named proton-1st and proton-2nd plans. The dosimetric effect of TPD was simulated by shifting tumor contours with the corresponding shift on patient specific planning CT and by recalculating the dose of the original plan.

Results: The range of magnitude of TPDs was 3.58-28.71 mm. In photon plans, TPDs did not impact tumor dose coverage, still achieving V100%RX of the GTV≥99% and V100%RX of the ITV≥98%. In proton plans for patients with TPDs>10 mm, inadequate target dose coverage was observed. More specifically, 8 fractions of proton-1st plans and 4 fractions of proton-2nd had V100%RX of the GTV<99% and V100%RX of the ITV<98%.

Conclusions: Adequate tumor dose coverage was achieved in photon SBRT for magnitude of TPDs up to 20 mm. TPDs had greater impact in proton SBRT and adaptive planning was needed when the magnitude of TPDs>10 mm to provide adequate tumor dose coverage.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光子和质子立体定向放射治疗肺癌肿瘤位置位移的剂量学影响。
目的:探讨肺癌患者光子和质子立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中肿瘤位置移位(TPDs)对肿瘤剂量覆盖的影响。方法:从2017-2021年770例接受光子SBRT治疗的肺癌患者的2877个部分的机构数据库中,鉴定出88例患者的163个部分,这些患者在kv锥束CT引导下,在任何方向上都有>1.5 cm的等心偏移。通过与骨和肿瘤对齐的双重注册,这两种对齐的等中心位移之间的差异被归类为TPDs。从15名TPD强度> 3mm的患者中各选择一个分数用于本研究。对于每位患者,回顾性地生成一个使用强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)的质子计划,并进行稳健优化。所有光子计划gtv的V100%RX>99%, itv的V100%RX>98%。质子方案以两种最坏情况(体素最差和最差情况)进行评估,使用5mm和3.5%的不确定性来实现与相应光子方案相同的规划目标。这两个评价质子方案分别被命名为质子-1和质子-2方案。TPD的剂量学效应是通过在患者特异性计划CT上相应移动肿瘤轮廓和重新计算原计划剂量来模拟的。结果:tpd大小范围为3.58 ~ 28.71 mm。在光子计划中,TPDs不影响肿瘤剂量覆盖,仍然达到GTV的100% rx≥99%和ITV的100% rx≥98%。在TPDs>10 mm患者的质子计划中,观察到靶剂量覆盖不足。更具体地说,质子1计划的8个部分和质子2计划的4个部分的rx为gt100 %的rx。结论:光子SBRT在TPDs大小为20 mm时达到了足够的肿瘤剂量覆盖。TPDs对质子SBRT的影响更大,当TPDs>10 mm时需要适应性计划以提供足够的肿瘤剂量覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1