Patterns and contexts of polysubstance use among young and older adults who are involved in the criminal legal system and use opioids: A mixed methods study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108864
Corianna E. Sichel , Daniel Winetsky , Stephanie Campos , Megan A. O'Grady , Susan Tross , Jane Kim , Alwyn Cohall , Renee Cohall , Katherine S. Elkington
{"title":"Patterns and contexts of polysubstance use among young and older adults who are involved in the criminal legal system and use opioids: A mixed methods study","authors":"Corianna E. Sichel ,&nbsp;Daniel Winetsky ,&nbsp;Stephanie Campos ,&nbsp;Megan A. O'Grady ,&nbsp;Susan Tross ,&nbsp;Jane Kim ,&nbsp;Alwyn Cohall ,&nbsp;Renee Cohall ,&nbsp;Katherine S. Elkington","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Opioid prevention and treatment programs tailored to young adults involved in the criminal legal system are rare. We examined profiles of polysubstance use among younger and older adults involved in the criminal legal system who use opioids, and explored their experiences and motivations related to substance use. Information gleaned can inform the adaptation of existing programs and the development of novel approaches for young adults in the criminal legal system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a sequential mixed methods design we 1) quantitatively identified typologies of polysubstance users among adults aged 18–24 (<em>n</em> = 92) and those age 25 and over (<em>n</em><span> = 27) involved in the criminal legal system who use opioids, using latent class analysis and 2) qualitatively explored differences in personal motivations, cultural influences, and psychosocial contexts of substance use by class.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our quantitative results supported a three-class typology: the majority of participants were in Class I (73 %, <em>n</em> = 87) and reported using primarily alcohol and marijuana. Participants in Classes II (15 %, <em>n</em> = 18) and III (12 %, <em>n</em> = 14) endorsed distinct and complicated polysubstance use profiles. Further, participants in Classes I and III were significantly younger than those in Class II. Qualitative analysis allowed us to understand associations between patterns of use, motivations, and contexts among young and older adults, comparing across classes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results highlight the importance of attending to the needs of subpopulations based on age and use patterns to adapt and develop targeted treatment and prevention programs for high-risk adults involved in the criminal legal system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Opioid prevention and treatment programs tailored to young adults involved in the criminal legal system are rare. We examined profiles of polysubstance use among younger and older adults involved in the criminal legal system who use opioids, and explored their experiences and motivations related to substance use. Information gleaned can inform the adaptation of existing programs and the development of novel approaches for young adults in the criminal legal system.

Methods

Using a sequential mixed methods design we 1) quantitatively identified typologies of polysubstance users among adults aged 18–24 (n = 92) and those age 25 and over (n = 27) involved in the criminal legal system who use opioids, using latent class analysis and 2) qualitatively explored differences in personal motivations, cultural influences, and psychosocial contexts of substance use by class.

Results

Our quantitative results supported a three-class typology: the majority of participants were in Class I (73 %, n = 87) and reported using primarily alcohol and marijuana. Participants in Classes II (15 %, n = 18) and III (12 %, n = 14) endorsed distinct and complicated polysubstance use profiles. Further, participants in Classes I and III were significantly younger than those in Class II. Qualitative analysis allowed us to understand associations between patterns of use, motivations, and contexts among young and older adults, comparing across classes.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the importance of attending to the needs of subpopulations based on age and use patterns to adapt and develop targeted treatment and prevention programs for high-risk adults involved in the criminal legal system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与刑事法律系统并使用阿片类药物的年轻人和老年人多物质使用的模式和背景:一项混合方法研究。
简介:为参与刑事法律系统的年轻人量身定制的阿片类药物预防和治疗计划很少。我们调查了刑事法律系统中使用阿片类药物的年轻人和老年人的多物质使用情况,并探讨了他们与药物使用相关的经历和动机。收集到的信息可以为调整现有方案和为刑事法律系统中的年轻人制定新方法提供信息。方法:使用顺序混合方法设计,我们1)使用潜在类别分析,定量确定了刑事法律系统中18-24岁(n=92)和25岁及以上(n=27)使用阿片类药物的成年人中多物质使用者的类型,以及按阶级划分的物质使用的心理社会背景。结果:我们的定量结果支持三类类型:大多数参与者属于I类(73%,n=87),并报告主要使用酒精和大麻。第二类(15%,n=18)和第三类(12%,n=14)的参与者认可不同且复杂的多物质使用情况。此外,第一班和第三班的参与者明显比第二班的参与者年轻。定性分析使我们能够了解年轻人和老年人的使用模式、动机和环境之间的关联,并在不同类别之间进行比较。结论:我们的研究结果强调了根据年龄和使用模式满足亚人群需求的重要性,以适应和制定针对刑事法律系统中高危成年人的有针对性的治疗和预防计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1